ISSN: 2250-3005 - ijcer

More documents

Recommendations

Info

International Journal Of Computational Engineering Research (ijceronline.com) Vol. 2 Issue. 8‣ ALL Drop In all drop, all the packets that are sent by the sender to the receiver are dropped by the wormholenodes.Fig. 12 Throughput for All Drop modeFig. 13 Avg Jitter for All Drop mode‣ Threshold (150 Bytes) In this case, wormhole drops all the packets which are above 150 bytes in size.5. Conlusion And Future WorkFrom simulation results it is concluded that AODV perform better than DYMO without wormhole attack. Butunder the wormhole attack the performance of bothe the protocols decreased. But still AODV has better performance thanDYMO. All Pass and Threshold has effected the performance greatly. At 25 nodes it has shown some results but as thenumber of nodes increased the wormhole nodes came into existance and decreased the performance completely. All drophas less affect on the performance as it drop the route request packets and routes are establishe d through other nodes inthe network.In future work performance can be measured with different performance metrics like routing overhead byvarying pause time and speed. Security mechanism to prevent from these types of attacks can also be developed.||Issn 2250-3005(online)|| ||December|| 2012 Page 295
International Journal Of Computational Engineering Research (ijceronline.com) Vol. 2 Issue. 8References[1] Priti Garg, Asma Tuteja. Comparative Performance Analysis of Two Ad-hoc Routing Protocols, InternationalConference on Network and Electronics Engineering, IPCSIT vol.11,IACSIT Press, Singapore, 2011.[2] Pravin Ghosekar, Girish Katkar, Dr. Pradip Ghorpade. Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Imperatives and Challenges ,IJCA Special Issue on “Mobile Ad-hoc Networks”, 2010.[3] Jeroen Hoebeke, Ingird Moerman, Bart Dhoebt and Piet Demeester, , An Overview of Mobile Ad-hoc Networking:Applications and Challenges, 2006.[4] S. Suresh kumar, T. V.P Sundararajan and A Shanmugam. Performance Comparison of three types of wormholeattack in Mobile Adhoc Network, proceedings of the international conference on information science andapplications, Chennai, India, 2010.[5] Gurjinder Kaur, V. K Jain and Yogesh Chaba. Wormhole attacks: Performance Evaluation of On Demand RoutingProtocols in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks, world conference on information and communication technologies,pp.1155-1158, 2011.[6] Dong-Won Kum, Jin-Su Park, You-Ze Cho and Byoung-Yoon Cheon. Performance Evaluation of AODV andDYMO Routing Protocols in MANET, IEEE CCNC, 2010.[7] Fahim Maan, Nauman Mazhar. MANET Routing Protocols vs Mobility Models: A PerformanceEvaluation,ICUFN, 2010.[8] MIAO Quan-xing, XU Lei. DYMO Routing Protocol Research and Simulation Based on NS2 InternationalConference on Computer Application and System Modeling, 2010.[9] Rashid Sheikh, Mahakal Singh Chandel, durgesh Kumar Mishra. Security issues in MANET: A Review, IEEE,2010.||Issn 2250-3005(online)|| ||December|| 2012 Page 296
Page 1 and 2:
ISSN: 2250-3005VOLUME 2 December 20
Page 3 and 4:
Meisam MahdaviQualification: Phd El
Page 5 and 6:
16. Implementation Of Serial Commun
Page 7 and 8:
45 Performance Evaluation Of Energy
Page 9 and 10:
International Journal Of Computatio
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
01 .048International Journal Of Com
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIO
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Body Acceleration (m/Sec2)Dynamic T
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
EigenvalueEigenvalueInternational J
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253: International Journal Of Computatio
Page 334 and 335: Average JitterThroughputInternation
Page 336 and 337: Energy Consumed in Received ModeEne
show all

ISSN: 2250-3005 - ijcer

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?