ISSN: 2250-3005 - ijcer

More documents

Recommendations

Info

International Journal Of Computational Engineering Research (ijceronline.com) Vol. 2 Issue. 8Statistical analysis of data collection :-After completing the work of the data collection the investigator concentrated on the data analysis. The objectives of theresult of the problems. For the data analysis he used the nominal technique. In it he used the mean, standard deviation.Percentage and „t‟ value. The use of the percentage for the measurement of the Attitude of the students towards Englishcurriculum and learning difficulties. According to this 40% to 60% were average, above than 60% were positive and less than40% negative attitude. Than the use of the mean, standard deviation and „t‟ value for the comparisons of the attitude of thestudents towards English curriculum.1 Attitude of the students towards English curriculum. This is shown in the table no. 1Table No. – 1Attitude of the students towards English curriculum.Students N No. of statements Total Marks Average marks Per (%)Male 32 41 205 146.50 71.46Female 32 41 205 141.91 69.22Total 64 41 205 144.20 70.34Percentage of attitude of the students towards the English curriculumThere was taken a test of the attitude towards English curriculum of all the students. We can see from the table no. 1that the attitude towards English curriculum was 70.34% which is above 60%. So, the attitude of the rural male and femalestudent towards English curriculum was positive. The attitude of the rural male and female students towards English curriculumwere in squencly 71.46% and 69.22% which is above 60%. So, the attitude towards English curriculum was positive. We can seefrom the table no. 1 that the attitude of male students was more than the female students towards English curriculum. For theproof of it the investigator had calculated the Mean, S.D. „t‟ value which was shown in the table no. 12 comparison of attitude of male & female students towards English curriculum.Table No. – 2The mean, standard deviation, „t‟ value of the attitude of male & femaleSex N Mean S.D. „t‟ valueMale 32 146.50 6.91 2.32Female 32 141.91 8.16Df = 32, 0.05 base ‘t’ value 2.04200180160140M 120E 100A 80N 6040200MaleFemalePicture no. – 2Comparison of mode of attitude of male & female studentsThe investigator had done the comparison of attitude of male & female students towards English curriculum. Theinvestigator found the distance in the both „t‟ values. The investigator found 2.32 „t‟ value of the attitude which was above thebase value. We can see that the attitude of male students was more than the female students towards English curriculum. Thiswas shown in the table no. 2||Issn 2250-3005(online)|| ||December||2012|| Page 149
International Journal Of Computational Engineering Research (ijceronline.com) Vol. 2 Issue. 83, Attitude of rural & urban students towards English curriculum.To get above objective the investigator had collected the figures from the attitude valuation. Than he founded thepercentages of the figures, which was shown in the table no. 3.Table No. – 3Attitude of rural & urban students towards English curriculumArea N No. of statements Total marks Average marks Per (%)Rural 32 41 205 144.00 70.24Urban 32 41 205 144.41 70.44Total 64 41 205 142.20 70.34100 70.24 70.44 70.34908070M 60E 50A 40N 3020100 Rural Urban TotalPicture no. – 3Percentages of attitude of rural & urban students towards English curriculum.There was the research on the attitude of rural & urban students towards English curriculum. The attitude of the rural & urbanstudents towards English curriculum were in sequencly 70.24% and 70.44% which was above 60%. The attitude of the ruralurban and rural students towards English curriculum were positive. There no difference between the attitude of the rural urbanand rural students towards English curriculum4. comparison of attitudes of rural & urban students towards English curriculumTo get above objective the investigator had collected the figures of attitude of rural & urban students towards Englishcurriculum on the basis of them he counted the mean, S.D., and „t‟ value, which was shown in the table no. 4The investigator had done the comparison of attitude of rural & urban students towards English curriculum. Theinvestigator did not get distance between „t‟ value of attitudes of rural & urban students towards English curriculum. That matterwas shown in the picture no. 4 so, we can say that the attitudes of rural & urban students towards English curriculum were same.5 attitudes of rural & urban male students towards English curriculum.To achieve above goal the investigator gave the questioner to the rural & urban students, he got the data than he foundthe percentages of them. Which was shown in the table no. 5.Table No. – 5Attitude of rural & urban male students towards English curriculumArea N No. of statements Total marks Average marks Per (%)Urban statements 16 41 205 145.50 70.98Rural statements 16 41 205 147.50 71.95Total 30 41 205 146.5 71.46100 70.98 71.95 71.46908070P 60E 50R 40% 3020100 Urban Rural Total||Issn 2250-3005(online)|| ||December||2012|| Page 150
Page 1 and 2:
ISSN: 2250-3005VOLUME 2 December 20
Page 3 and 4:
Meisam MahdaviQualification: Phd El
Page 5 and 6:
16. Implementation Of Serial Commun
Page 7 and 8:
45 Performance Evaluation Of Energy
Page 9 and 10:
International Journal Of Computatio
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
01 .048International Journal Of Com
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107: International Journal Of Computatio
Page 108 and 109: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIO
Page 186 and 187: Body Acceleration (m/Sec2)Dynamic T
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
EigenvalueEigenvalueInternational J
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Average JitterThroughputInternation
Page 336 and 337:
Energy Consumed in Received ModeEne
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
show all

ISSN: 2250-3005 - ijcer

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?