11.07.2015 Views

What's the Answer? - Create

What's the Answer? - Create

What's the Answer? - Create

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part B: KEY ISSUESBackgroundIn summarising her extensive review of <strong>the</strong> international literature, Tweddle (2007) highlighted what,unfortunately, have become common characteristics exhibited by youth who are transitioning from<strong>the</strong> care system to independence. Compared with <strong>the</strong>ir peers in <strong>the</strong> general population, <strong>the</strong>y aremore likely to be:• undereducated (not have completed high school)• unemployed or underemployed• earning lower wages (if employed)• parents at a younger age• incarcerated or involved with <strong>the</strong> criminal justice system• homelessness at some stage of <strong>the</strong>ir lives• living in unstable housing arrangements• dependent on social assistance• experiencing mental health issues• without medical insurance (in <strong>the</strong> US)• at a higher risk of substance abuse.Not all young people experience this full range of negative outcomes when leaving care. Individualdifferences are observed, as Stein (2008) points out, because of different starting points and <strong>the</strong>diversity of family background and care experiences. He identified three different outcome groups,emphasising that each would require different types and amounts of support during and aftertransition. Stein defined <strong>the</strong>se clusters as <strong>the</strong> (a) Moving on, (b) Survivors, and (c) Strugglers groups.“Moving on” included those young people who “welcomed <strong>the</strong> challenge of living independently andgaining more control over <strong>the</strong>ir lives” (p. 300). These young people made effective use of <strong>the</strong> help<strong>the</strong>y had been offered and kept positive links with carers and some family members. The “Survivors”tended to include younger care leavers who had experienced disrupted placements and moremovement after exiting, often related to homelessness and unemployment. They benefitted mostfrom assistance from specialist caseworkers and mentors. His most disadvantaged group, <strong>the</strong>“Strugglers”, experienced <strong>the</strong> classic difficulties associated with care leavers and required most aftercaresupport. Their needs should not be overlooked even though <strong>the</strong>y seem to benefit least from thisassistance.Costs of InactionAs summarised in <strong>the</strong> Transitioning to Independence sub-working group’s Discussion Paper forNFIWG, Morgan Disney & Associates (2006) have estimated that <strong>the</strong>se different cohorts of careleavers cost governments within Australia an average of $40,000 per person per annum, with 55%being in <strong>the</strong> high-needs, high-cost categories.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!