11.07.2015 Views

What's the Answer? - Create

What's the Answer? - Create

What's the Answer? - Create

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part C: METHODOLOGYOverviewTo confirm that <strong>the</strong> issues identified in Part B of this Report were of current significance for youngpeople, and to give care leavers <strong>the</strong> opportunity to raise o<strong>the</strong>r points <strong>the</strong>y felt worthy of discussion, aseries of consultations were conducted. The first tier of consultations utilised CREATE’s YouthAdvisory Groups (YAG) as <strong>the</strong>y provide a state- and territory-based forum for young people with acare experience to establish <strong>the</strong> issues and priorities that must be addressed and resolved if <strong>the</strong>process of transitioning to independence is to be improved overall. These key priorities <strong>the</strong>n formed<strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> second tier of consultations involving CREATE’s National Youth Advisory Council(NYAC) in a one-day workshop which culminated in <strong>the</strong> identification of practical solutions that couldbe applied by <strong>the</strong> Commonwealth and/or State and Territory governments, non-governmentorganisations and agencies to effect quality outcomes for young people transitioning from out-ofhomecare to independence.Stage 1: Initial Consultations (YAG Focus Groups)ParticipantsThis consultation targeted only those YAG members who were ei<strong>the</strong>r preparing to leave care,actually transitioning, or were living independently. The total number involved in <strong>the</strong> consultationprocess was 27 representing all states (however, <strong>the</strong>re were no individuals from ei<strong>the</strong>r territory).Participants were aged between 14 and 23 years (mean age 18.5 years), with <strong>the</strong> majority beingfemale (n=18). Three identified as Indigenous (Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander) and twoidentified as having “O<strong>the</strong>r Cultural Background” (Spanish/Italian and Solomon Islander). Theremainder of <strong>the</strong> group were Caucasian Australians. Members had experienced a range of placementtypes while in careInstrumentFive key questions were developed to elicit <strong>the</strong> priorities that young people with a care experienceidentified as needing to be addressed to improve <strong>the</strong> transitioning system. They were asked todiscuss: (a) What makes a successful transition? (b) What are <strong>the</strong> barriers to young people accessingservices and supports? (c) Would you prefer to go a specialised service (e.g. an after care service justfor young people who’d been in care) or prefer to go to a mainstream service (e.g. a general youthservice)? (d) Do you think <strong>the</strong>re’s a stigma attached to specialised services, or do you think youngpeople are okay with accessing services tailor made to out-of-home care and aftercare supports? (e)What do you think about <strong>the</strong> idea of transitioning to ‘independence’? Is it a good thing to be aimingfor, or should we be focussing more on connecting young people to <strong>the</strong>ir community, friends, family,and o<strong>the</strong>r supports? Or should we be doing both? (see Appendix A).11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!