Medical Tourism in Developing Countries
Medical Tourism in Developing Countries Medical Tourism in Developing Countries
CHAPTER 4Would You Like a Safari WithYour Lasik Surgery? The Supply ofMedical TourismIn the 1970s, tourists from Europe and Japan traversed long distancesto be treated by Tony Agpaoa, a Philippine faith healer. To facilitate themedical transactions, Mr. Agpaoa put his patients up at his own hotelin Baguio City. Patients were saved the trouble of seeking accommodationsand while there, were able to partake in Philippine food and culture in anexotic landscape. While the twenty-first century medical tourism offered inLDCs differ in scope, breadth, and technology from what Mr. Agpaoaoffered, in their essence the transactions are the same: medical services arebeing packaged according to their particular setting. Be it the King HusseinCancer Center in Jordan, or Cira Garcia Clinic in Cuba, or even Mr. Agpaoa’ssomewhat rustic facilities in the Philippines, medical tourism entails thesupply of health services marketed so as to reach the demand source thatsustains them. To enhance the medical experience, tie-ins are offered totourist services. All in all, both Tony Agpaoa and large modern hospitalsshare commercial opportunities and management challenges of the medicaltourism industry.Supply is the focus of this chapter. While chapter 3 examined whichservices are in demand (such as invasive and diagnostic procedures, lifestylemedicine, luxury, high-tech medical tourism, border services, and traditionalmedicine, as well as all the hospitality services associated with thetravel and tourism industry such as transportation, accommodation, food,and beverage), the focus here is on how those services are supplied andpromoted. The chapter begins with an analysis of the respective roles of thepublic and private sectors. The former, heavily involved in economic developmentas well as health care and tourism, promotes medical tourism
66 ● Medical Tourism in Developing Countriesthrough a variety of efforts discussed below. The private sector pursues itsprofit interests by attracting foreign patients. Neither sector alone canachieve their goals without the participation of the other. This necessarycooperation is analyzed with an eye on the best way to ensure that medicaltourism takes off. The private and public sectors in developing countriesare then placed into the global context, as they both function within aframework set by international organizations, and they both tap foreign—physical and human—resources that are governed by international laws andregulations. Finally, the nature and rationale of medical tourism’s tie-ins tothe tourist industry are described.The Public SectorThe role of the state in medical tourism must be viewed against the broaderrole of the state in economic development, in health care, and intourism.With respect to the former, Meier and Rauch have divided the literatureon the role of the public sector in economic development into three categories.1 The most optimistic view says that the state is a benevolent leader indevelopment, a force that maximizes social welfare. The pessimistic viewstates that the government is an obstacle to development because it representsthe interests of a narrow group and acts against the majority. A thirdview says that there is a wide possible range of relationships between thestate and development, and each case must be assessed as to whether thestate can formulate and implement policy without corruption. It is thismiddle road that many scholars have supported, and in so doing, they havefound that there is indeed a role for the state in economic development.This role has waxed and waned over time, being high in the aftermath ofWorld War II (or LDC independence), dropping somewhat in the marketoriented 1980s, and rising once again in the twenty-first century. As PeterCalvert noted, the role of the state was under attack during the 1980s and1990s when the Washington Consensus orthodoxy reigned, according towhich the role of the government should be kept to a minimum. 2 Due tofrequent market failures, the state is being brought back in. 3This re-emergence of government has been highlighted by scholars.Sinclair and Stabler noted that, “in contrast to traditional neoclassical theory,new growth theory provides a possible role for government.” 4 Mittelman andPasha also identified the role of the state, especially with respect to capitalaccumulation in the less developed countries. 5 Similar views have beenvoiced outside scholarly circles, from international organizations and policymakers. According to the UNWTO, “It is widely recognized that the market
- Page 27 and 28: 14 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 29 and 30: Table 1.1 Economic indicators and t
- Page 31 and 32: 18 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 33 and 34: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 35 and 36: 22 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 37 and 38: 24 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 40 and 41: Plastic Surgery is Not Peanuts ●
- Page 43 and 44: 30 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 45 and 46: 32 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 47 and 48: 34 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 49 and 50: 36 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 51 and 52: 38 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 53 and 54: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 55 and 56: 42 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 57 and 58: 44 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 59 and 60: 46 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 61 and 62: 48 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 63 and 64: 50 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 65 and 66: 52 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 67 and 68: 54 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 69 and 70: 56 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 71 and 72: 58 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 73 and 74: 60 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 75 and 76: 62 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 77: 64 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 81 and 82: 68 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 83 and 84: 70 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 85 and 86: 72 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 87 and 88: 74 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 89 and 90: 76 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 91 and 92: 78 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 93 and 94: 80 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 95 and 96: 82 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 97 and 98: 84 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 99 and 100: 86 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 101 and 102: 88 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 103 and 104: 90 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 105 and 106: 92 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 107 and 108: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 109 and 110: 96 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 111 and 112: 98 ● Medical Tourism in Developin
- Page 113 and 114: 100 ● Medical Tourism in Developi
- Page 115 and 116: 102 ● Medical Tourism in Developi
- Page 117 and 118: 104 ● Medical Tourism in Developi
- Page 119 and 120: 106 ● Medical Tourism in Developi
- Page 121 and 122: 108 ● Medical Tourism in Developi
- Page 123 and 124: 110 ● Medical Tourism in Developi
- Page 125 and 126: 112 ● Medical Tourism in Developi
- Page 127 and 128: Table 5.4 Indicators of physical in
66 ● <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>in</strong> Develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Countries</strong>through a variety of efforts discussed below. The private sector pursues itsprofit <strong>in</strong>terests by attract<strong>in</strong>g foreign patients. Neither sector alone canachieve their goals without the participation of the other. This necessarycooperation is analyzed with an eye on the best way to ensure that medicaltourism takes off. The private and public sectors <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countriesare then placed <strong>in</strong>to the global context, as they both function with<strong>in</strong> aframework set by <strong>in</strong>ternational organizations, and they both tap foreign—physical and human—resources that are governed by <strong>in</strong>ternational laws andregulations. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the nature and rationale of medical tourism’s tie-<strong>in</strong>s tothe tourist <strong>in</strong>dustry are described.The Public SectorThe role of the state <strong>in</strong> medical tourism must be viewed aga<strong>in</strong>st the broaderrole of the state <strong>in</strong> economic development, <strong>in</strong> health care, and <strong>in</strong>tourism.With respect to the former, Meier and Rauch have divided the literatureon the role of the public sector <strong>in</strong> economic development <strong>in</strong>to three categories.1 The most optimistic view says that the state is a benevolent leader <strong>in</strong>development, a force that maximizes social welfare. The pessimistic viewstates that the government is an obstacle to development because it representsthe <strong>in</strong>terests of a narrow group and acts aga<strong>in</strong>st the majority. A thirdview says that there is a wide possible range of relationships between thestate and development, and each case must be assessed as to whether thestate can formulate and implement policy without corruption. It is thismiddle road that many scholars have supported, and <strong>in</strong> so do<strong>in</strong>g, they havefound that there is <strong>in</strong>deed a role for the state <strong>in</strong> economic development.This role has waxed and waned over time, be<strong>in</strong>g high <strong>in</strong> the aftermath ofWorld War II (or LDC <strong>in</strong>dependence), dropp<strong>in</strong>g somewhat <strong>in</strong> the marketoriented 1980s, and ris<strong>in</strong>g once aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the twenty-first century. As PeterCalvert noted, the role of the state was under attack dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1980s and1990s when the Wash<strong>in</strong>gton Consensus orthodoxy reigned, accord<strong>in</strong>g towhich the role of the government should be kept to a m<strong>in</strong>imum. 2 Due tofrequent market failures, the state is be<strong>in</strong>g brought back <strong>in</strong>. 3This re-emergence of government has been highlighted by scholars.S<strong>in</strong>clair and Stabler noted that, “<strong>in</strong> contrast to traditional neoclassical theory,new growth theory provides a possible role for government.” 4 Mittelman andPasha also identified the role of the state, especially with respect to capitalaccumulation <strong>in</strong> the less developed countries. 5 Similar views have beenvoiced outside scholarly circles, from <strong>in</strong>ternational organizations and policymakers. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the UNWTO, “It is widely recognized that the market