Medical Tourism in Developing Countries

Medical Tourism in Developing Countries Medical Tourism in Developing Countries

staff.guilan.ac.ir
from staff.guilan.ac.ir More from this publisher
11.07.2015 Views

Promoting Medical Tourism ● 129said, “Although privatization of health services and their opening to trade arenot necessarily synonymous, the first has accelerated the second . . ..” 114Why is liberal trade so important? According to Panagariya, “It is toughto find an example of a developing country that has grown rapidly whilemaintaining high trade barriers.” 115 He goes on to say that even thoughIndia and China had protectionist policies in place when they began theirrapid growth, the reason they were able to maintain it was because theyadopted massive liberalization.What are the barriers? To the extent that trade in health services is notprohibited, then tariffs constitute the primary barrier. These may beimposed on trade in goods associated with health (such as pharmaceuticals),or on consumers (such as visa fees and entry taxes). Nontariff barriers totrade include international standards (such as the nonrecognition of licensesfrom abroad), and the need for licensing by the government. With respectto both of these, the authorities may decide to discriminate in favor of localpersons and thus limit trade with foreigners. Other barriers are in the marketingand distribution spheres that form indirect barriers to access.Currency restrictions may limit capital movement while labor and consumermovements may be limited by residency conditions, licensing, workpermits, visas, and entry/exit taxes.Removing these barriers opens countries up for trade that in turn promotesgrowth, because it forces everyone to become more efficient in orderto survive. Thus competition is growth promoting. Moreover, liberalizedtrade in services promotes growth because, as Bhagwati said, it expandsupstream services (product designs, market feasibility studies), and downstreamservices (advertising, marketing, packaging, and transporting). 116As a result, many GATS member countries have committed to liberalizationin trade in services. According to Adlung and Carzaniga, “GATS providesa system of predictable and legally enforceable conditions for trade,and has a potentially positive impact on investment, efficiency andgrowth.” 117 However, with respect to trade in health services specifically, lessthan 40 percent of countries made commitments to liberalize. 118 This numberjumps to 90 percent for tourism services. The following destinationcountries under study have not made any commitments for trade in services:Argentina, Chile, Cuba, Philippines, and Thailand. 119 No country hasput restrictions on buying health services outside their own countries.In other words, of the trade in health services, the category of consumptionabroad (Mode 2) has no limits. Countries have ongoing negotiations withinGATS on the “temporary presence of natural persons,” (namely, Mode4). 120 The more developed countries want to be able to send their workersabroad and the less developed want their multinationals to have greater

130 ● Medical Tourism in Developing Countriesmobility of their personnel. Both exporting and importing countries areseeking to eliminate barriers such as visa formalities, prohibitions, andquotas, nonrecognition of professional qualifications and licensing requirements,discriminatory treatment, and wage parity issues. The eliminationof these barriers will make the promotion of medical tourism easier.The Example of IndiaAccording to the World Bank, liberalization of the Indian economy is oneof the most important reasons for the phenomenal growth of its servicesector. 121 This is true also for medical tourism, for without extensive liberalization,India would not be at the industry’s global forefront. Corporatehospitals such as the Apollo chain would not have risen to their prominencein the absence of economic reforms that increased the role of the privatesector, provided a legal infrastructure that protected business, and liberalizedtrade so that modern medical equipment could be imported.Since Independence, India has been a democracy with rule of law andthe protection of its citizens’ private property. It had a banking system, andpublic and private accountability. Still, it was not a liberal economy and thefunctioning of the market system was curtailed. In the post–World War IIperiod, India was characterized by strong government involvement in theeconomy. Industrial policy promoted heavy industry, government controlswere extensive, foreign trade and exchange was regulated, and prices of basiccommodities were set. The license system enabled central authorities todetermine production quantities, allocation of resources, and prices ofinputs (and sometimes even output). A license or stamp of approval wasneeded for all business transactions, no matter how minute. Those licenseswere strictly regulated and required much time to get (and often bribes aswell). During the period of import substitution, in addition to licenses,there were also a combination of high tariff and quotas placed on allimported goods.While India first implemented reforms in the 1970s, only two of themwere liberalizing: relaxing industrial regulation to promote efficiency, andpromoting exports. 122 It is only the reforms of 1991, under Rajiv Gandhiand the Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao (1991–96) that stand outas the first comprehensive attempt at reviving the economy by seriouslydecreasing the government’s role and increasing that of the market. 123 TheNew Industrial Policy (NIP) of 1991 scaled down the industries reservedfor the public sector from 29 to 8, industrial licensing was abolished in all,but 18 industries, private sector competition was introduced, and the governmenthalted nationalization. 124 Nevertheless, the Economic Survey putout by the Finance Ministry in 2000 said that further reforms were

130 ● <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>in</strong> Develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Countries</strong>mobility of their personnel. Both export<strong>in</strong>g and import<strong>in</strong>g countries areseek<strong>in</strong>g to elim<strong>in</strong>ate barriers such as visa formalities, prohibitions, andquotas, nonrecognition of professional qualifications and licens<strong>in</strong>g requirements,discrim<strong>in</strong>atory treatment, and wage parity issues. The elim<strong>in</strong>ationof these barriers will make the promotion of medical tourism easier.The Example of IndiaAccord<strong>in</strong>g to the World Bank, liberalization of the Indian economy is oneof the most important reasons for the phenomenal growth of its servicesector. 121 This is true also for medical tourism, for without extensive liberalization,India would not be at the <strong>in</strong>dustry’s global forefront. Corporatehospitals such as the Apollo cha<strong>in</strong> would not have risen to their prom<strong>in</strong>ence<strong>in</strong> the absence of economic reforms that <strong>in</strong>creased the role of the privatesector, provided a legal <strong>in</strong>frastructure that protected bus<strong>in</strong>ess, and liberalizedtrade so that modern medical equipment could be imported.S<strong>in</strong>ce Independence, India has been a democracy with rule of law andthe protection of its citizens’ private property. It had a bank<strong>in</strong>g system, andpublic and private accountability. Still, it was not a liberal economy and thefunction<strong>in</strong>g of the market system was curtailed. In the post–World War IIperiod, India was characterized by strong government <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> theeconomy. Industrial policy promoted heavy <strong>in</strong>dustry, government controlswere extensive, foreign trade and exchange was regulated, and prices of basiccommodities were set. The license system enabled central authorities todeterm<strong>in</strong>e production quantities, allocation of resources, and prices of<strong>in</strong>puts (and sometimes even output). A license or stamp of approval wasneeded for all bus<strong>in</strong>ess transactions, no matter how m<strong>in</strong>ute. Those licenseswere strictly regulated and required much time to get (and often bribes aswell). Dur<strong>in</strong>g the period of import substitution, <strong>in</strong> addition to licenses,there were also a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of high tariff and quotas placed on allimported goods.While India first implemented reforms <strong>in</strong> the 1970s, only two of themwere liberaliz<strong>in</strong>g: relax<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrial regulation to promote efficiency, andpromot<strong>in</strong>g exports. 122 It is only the reforms of 1991, under Rajiv Gandhiand the Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister P. V. Narasimha Rao (1991–96) that stand outas the first comprehensive attempt at reviv<strong>in</strong>g the economy by seriouslydecreas<strong>in</strong>g the government’s role and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g that of the market. 123 TheNew Industrial Policy (NIP) of 1991 scaled down the <strong>in</strong>dustries reservedfor the public sector from 29 to 8, <strong>in</strong>dustrial licens<strong>in</strong>g was abolished <strong>in</strong> all,but 18 <strong>in</strong>dustries, private sector competition was <strong>in</strong>troduced, and the governmenthalted nationalization. 124 Nevertheless, the Economic Survey putout by the F<strong>in</strong>ance M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>in</strong> 2000 said that further reforms were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!