Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ...

Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ... Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ...

enhancedif.org
from enhancedif.org More from this publisher
11.07.2015 Views

N T I S2010than pesticide residues given that most agro-food exports are cooked (kill step) before consumption. It isimportant to understand that food-borne human pathogens and toxins originate from three main sources: (1)humans (through ignorance and inadequate provision of amenities such as toilets and hand-washing facilities);(2) domestic animals where there are opportunities for cross-contamination; and (3) toxin producing plantpathogens such as Aspergillus and Fusarium spp. It is important to note that mycotoxins are not destroyedby cooking.Nevertheless, the current microbiological situation in Nepalese agriculture is unacceptable not only from aGAPs perspective, but also as a matter of public health. To address these three issues from a GAPs perspective,the following is necessary:1. Faecal contamination: It is vitally necessary to segregate animal production and accompanying animalwaste from the harvest and post-harvest treatment of food crops. Granted that smallholder farmershave highly limited resources; in fact, what is mostly needed is awareness. In a rather typical instanceillustrated (Figure 1), the use of simple drying racks on the other side of the dwelling would reduce thepotential cross contamination considerably. Backed up by proper hand washing facilities and toilets,*this simple change would go a long way towards GAPs compliance;2. Provision of clean water: It is critical to develop a culture of neighbourliness backed up by legislationand technology in respect of water. Farmers go to some trouble to provide themselves with cleanwater (Figure 2), but then generally let it run down to ultimately heavily pollute the valley bottoms.The technology to provide soak-aways to return waste water into the water table in an environmentallysustainable way is cheap and simple and requires little in the way of inputs that is not already readilyavailable locally.Animal feeding (right) with dried coles destined forhuman consumption (bottom left)Typical provision of drinking water in the Kathmanduvalley with significant down hill/stream pollution* It was not possible to look at toilets during the field work that accompanied the preparation of this chapter, but these need not be complex orexpensive, e.g. the ‘Blair’ toilet in Zimbabwe.NEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT305

N T I S2010In terms of post-harvest microbiological risks (farm gate to consumer), there are currently two possiblestandards for application to pack-house situations in Nepal. These are the introduction of a compulsory: QMS (Quality Management System) (ISO 9001:2000). This could be regarded as a first stage certificationin preparation for full HACCP certification; HACCP Standard as adopted by the NSC (ISO 22000:2005), which can be certified by a third partycertification body.Currently, no pack-house in Nepal has been through a QMS/HACCP audit. All certification processes have abusiness cost and the need for developing more advanced certification schemes for pack-houses should beadopted on the basis of clearly defined business need or properly enforced legislative requirements (as is thecase, for example, in Thailand). Business needs may include customer requirements and/or market access.Priority 3: Control of Gross Contamination of Agricultural ProductsThis is a function of the full implementation of GAPs and need not be considered further,E. Recommendations Nepal should seek advice on developing a national GAP standard with a modified form of group- GAPscertification, as outlined in Appendix 5. The outset goal should be that the standards can be ‘ratcheted’up in stages over a period so as to meet full international standards. The immediate objective wouldbe to avoid batch testing of agro-food exports for pesticide residues at the Indian border. Accordingly,it would be necessary to consult with the relevant Indian authorities about an acceptable form ofcertification to avoid batch testing; This certification should be closely coordinated with the socio-economic programmes, particularlythose that are working with institution building in the form of cooperatives, marketing associationsand commodity associations; A forward plan of a phased GAPs system (a developed GAP standard and system of auditing andcertification) should be prepared to enable prioritization in terms of chemical>microbiological>foreignbody certification/compliance; The DoA MoHP should have a wide remit to provide necessary ongoing training to many groups(farmers, marketers, processors, handlers) on the implementation of GAPs, GMPs, and subsequentcertification; Nepal’s pesticide registration and approval procedures need review to ensure compliance with theUnited Kingdom Pesticide Safety Directorate permitted levels; Farmers receive advice on pesticides from many different sources. This includes pesticide companysales staff and the DoA. The quality of this advice may vary and in some cases may not be safe, legal orappropriate, and must be addressed by a certificate of competence in crop protection as a mandatoryrequirement for all advisors and sellers of pesticides; Suitable training and certification of pesticide advisors and applicators is necessary to re-assurecustomers that they operate under the same standards of pesticide knowledge as those companies intarget markets; The development of a training similar scheme for the advisors and sellers of pesticides in Nepal.306NEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT

N T I S2010In terms <strong>of</strong> post-harvest microbiological risks (farm gate to consumer), there are currently two possiblestandards for application to pack-house situations in Nepal. These are the introduction <strong>of</strong> a compulsory: QMS (Quality Management System) (ISO 9001:2000). This could be regarded as a first stage certificationin preparation for full HACCP certification; HACCP Standard as adopted by the NSC (ISO 22000:2005), which can be certified by a third partycertification body.Currently, no pack-house in Nepal has been through a QMS/HACCP audit. All certification processes have abusiness cost and the need for developing more advanced certification schemes for pack-houses should beadopted on the basis <strong>of</strong> clearly defined business need or properly enforced legislative requirements (as is thecase, for example, in Thailand). Business needs may include customer requirements and/or market access.Priority 3: Control <strong>of</strong> Gross Contamination <strong>of</strong> Agricultural ProductsThis is a function <strong>of</strong> the full implementation <strong>of</strong> GAPs and need not be considered further,E. Recommendations Nepal should seek advice on developing a national GAP standard with a modified form <strong>of</strong> group- GAPscertification, as outlined in Appendix 5. The outset goal should be that the standards can be ‘ratcheted’up in stages over a period so as to meet full international standards. The immediate objective wouldbe to avoid batch testing <strong>of</strong> agro-food exports for pesticide residues at the Indian border. Accordingly,it would be necessary to consult with the relevant Indian authorities about an acceptable form <strong>of</strong>certification to avoid batch testing; This certification should be closely coordinated with the socio-economic programmes, particularlythose that are working with institution building in the form <strong>of</strong> cooperatives, marketing associationsand commodity associations; A forward plan <strong>of</strong> a phased GAPs system (a developed GAP standard and system <strong>of</strong> auditing andcertification) should be prepared to enable prioritization in terms <strong>of</strong> chemical>microbiological>foreignbody certification/compliance; The DoA MoHP should have a wide remit to provide necessary ongoing training to many groups(farmers, marketers, processors, handlers) on the implementation <strong>of</strong> GAPs, GMPs, and subsequentcertification; Nepal’s pesticide registration and approval procedures need review to ensure compliance with theUnited Kingdom Pesticide Safety Directorate permitted levels; Farmers receive advice on pesticides from many different sources. This includes pesticide companysales staff and the DoA. The quality <strong>of</strong> this advice may vary and in some cases may not be safe, legal orappropriate, and must be addressed by a certificate <strong>of</strong> competence in crop protection as a mandatoryrequirement for all advisors and sellers <strong>of</strong> pesticides; Suitable training and certification <strong>of</strong> pesticide advisors and applicators is necessary to re-assurecustomers that they operate under the same standards <strong>of</strong> pesticide knowledge as those companies intarget markets; The development <strong>of</strong> a training similar scheme for the advisors and sellers <strong>of</strong> pesticides in Nepal.306NEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!