11.07.2015 Views

Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ...

Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ...

Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

N T I S2010Indian phytosanitary standards require that Nepal can only export lentils that are free from soil and have beenfumigated with methyl bromide or equivalent or any other treatment approved by the Plant Protection Adviserto the Government <strong>of</strong> India and that the fumigation treatment is endorsed on the phytosanitary certificateaccompanying the shipment. Currently, the DoA provides for the fumigation and certification <strong>of</strong> lentil exportsto India. There is no other SPS support for lentil export from Nepal, though agrochemical registration is basedlargely on Indian standards, which presumably are themselves based on CODEX standards.Future government/private sector interactions rest on the continuing market access with the likelihood <strong>of</strong>increasingly stringent CODEX-based requirements being required by the Indian government and privatesector. Forward planning should include a review <strong>of</strong> fumigation and agrochemical registration based on atleast the possibility <strong>of</strong> Montreal Protocol (which may stop the use <strong>of</strong> methyl bromide for fumigation 15 ) andCODEX standards for agrochemical MRLs. Government support to a producer/marketer-led lentil exportersassociation will be necessary. This association and/or its constituent members can ‘work towards’ TCPcertification, which must, in the final analysis, be market-driven.TeaIntroductionAlthough tea growing has been established for about 150 years in Nepal, it was not until 1982 that its significanceas an export earner was identified by the government, together with the designation <strong>of</strong> the eastern districts<strong>of</strong> Jhapa, Ilam, Panchthar, Terhathum, and Dhankuta as tea zones. From then on, there has been formalassistance to the sector from government. The Nepal Tea and C<strong>of</strong>fee Development Board Act passed in 1993,together with the formation <strong>of</strong> the Tea Board. A National Tea Policy was introduced in year 2000 to supportthe growth <strong>of</strong> the sector. The Government also privatized their holdings at that time. Significant increases <strong>of</strong>exports in quantity and value <strong>of</strong> tea have occurred, though the crop constituted only 0.25 per cent to the totalexport earnings <strong>of</strong> Nepalese export earnings in 2007/08. Due to a significant number <strong>of</strong> individual or separateinterests and a lack <strong>of</strong> readiness to work together, the sector remains weaker than it could be. Despitethis, a large number <strong>of</strong> people, including small holders, are engaged in growing tea with over 30,000 peopledirectly involved in the industry, including a large percentage <strong>of</strong> rural women. The potential for employment<strong>of</strong> rural women and poverty alleviation has ensured that tea has been the focus <strong>of</strong> attention <strong>of</strong> internationalorganizations and NGOs in Nepal. The tea produced in the Terai region originates predominantly from clonebushes, which are very similar to those <strong>of</strong> the Indian Siliguri region, and producing similar crush-tear-curl (CTC)type <strong>of</strong> tea. Orthodox tea grown in the hill regions mainly from seedling varieties is very similar to the IndianDarjeeling tea.SPS Issues in the Tea SectorTea in Nepal is attacked by a range <strong>of</strong> arthropod pests and diseases. These pests in many cases require the use<strong>of</strong> agrochemicals, which, in turn, requires exporters to demonstrate to buyers that these chemicals have beencorrectly applied. It is frequently asserted that incorrect and high application <strong>of</strong> agrochemicals has led to high15The fact that the hole in the ozone layer (caused by chloro-fluoro carbons and more controversially by bromine compounds used infumigation) has largely recovered but has not led to any easing <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Montreal Protocol, especially in terms <strong>of</strong> TPC.Therefore, it is prudent to assume that alternative fumigation chemicals will be required at some point in the future.200NEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!