Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ...
Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ... Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ...
N T I S2010CommodityAreaExistence of NationalStandards Technical RegulationsFaced in Importing MarketsMandatory VoluntaryTesting Facilitiesfor ParametersEssentialOilsNo No No for non-CITES items only1.Importing party istaking care of testing2. Purchase decision ismade depending on thebatch sample tests,3. Essential oil contentdeterminationSilverjewelryNo NoCadmium-free silver jewelryrequired by EUContent of cadmium,nickel, etcPashmina No Test for fur diameterbelow 16.5 micronConformity test of thequality of raw materialwool required for selfconfidenceWoollenproductsother thancarpetNo No Azo dye-freeWool diameter of around26 micronConformity test of thequality of raw materialwool required for selfconfidenceHandmadepaperYes YesProcess Certifi cationOptional1. Forest stewardshipcertifi cation (FSC)facilitated export2.Organic certifi cationHandmade paperreceived FSCExpected Role of Govt. Agency1. Range setting for residual essential oil content insome of the herbs and aromatic plants after essentialoil extraction2. DPR/ MoFSC specifi cations on residual oil contentGovernment’s support to establish a testing facilityat FHAN for qualitative and quantitative testing ofcadmium in the fi nished products in a non-destructiveway is sought on PPP basis1.Government’s support to establish a testing facilityat FHAN or independently for qualitative testing ofwool fi bre (raw or fi nished products) sought by theassociations concerned as they are planning forcollective trademark promotion of Nepal Pashmina,with its own brand identity2. Raw material standard requested and test facilitiesunder PPP soughtTo introduce quality certifi cate requirement whileimporting raw material wool, if Nepal wants to promoteNepalese product or establish one testing facility toexamine the fi bre diameter and softness of wool forstated purposesNEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT185
N T I S20107.14 Priority Actions and ConclusionsPriority Actions proposed under the NITS 2009 are summarized in the Action Matrix.Nepal has yet to fulfil its WTO commitments in the area of TBTs. The country is lagging behind in updating anddrafting laws, in creating institutions, and in making laws and institutions operational.Some gaps in current technical assistance programmes/projects have been identified. The need for nationalstandards for the products of export interest has been stressed. Further efforts are also to be made toaccelerate accreditation of a few major laboratories for test parameters so that they can provide conformityassessment services in Nepalese products of export interest.Establishment of a packaging material testing laboratory should also be considered.The stakeholders involved in the international trade need a more effective, transparent, useful, and specializednational enquiry point for the TBT. The GoN needs to commit greater resources, including trained anddedicated staff, to this new facility.There is a need to look into the establishment of sector-specific PPP test laboratories to serve the sectorsinvolved in international trade, as well as extending some technical support to private sector laboratories fortheir accreditation process.The current efforts to create the NBSM and DFTQC as national certification bodies have been encouraging. Inthe meantime, the private sector should also be given some opportunities to establish a few internationallyrecognized certifying bodies to cater to the needs of the trading communities. There is also a need to reviewcarefully possible conflicts of interest between the regulatory functions of the NBSM, DFTQC, and othergovernment agencies and their aim to become certification bodies.There is a need to develop coordination mechanisms among various government agencies involved instandard setting and in the implementation of technical regulations. A separate TBT coordination committeeis desirable.Nepalese industry does not fully understand the role of product standards, technical regulations and conformityassessment in global trade. Exports from Nepal face strict import requirements in export markets and many atimes face border rejections. The current efforts to create national certification body have to be stepped upand the private sector should also be given some opportunities to establish a few internationally recognizedcertifying bodies to cater to the needs of the trading communities.186NEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT
- Page 148 and 149: N T I S2010India’s view is that t
- Page 150 and 151: Chapter 4Access to the Chinese Mark
- Page 152 and 153: N T I S2010products must be wholly
- Page 154 and 155: N T I S2010The findings discussed h
- Page 156 and 157: N T I S20104.5 Other Impediments to
- Page 158: N T I S20104.7 Recommendations: Cha
- Page 161 and 162: N T I S2010inflow between 2000 and
- Page 163 and 164: N T I S2010Industrial Parks and SEZ
- Page 165 and 166: N T I S2010Lack of up-to-date polic
- Page 167 and 168: N T I S2010Apart from the critical
- Page 169 and 170: N T I S2010capabilities in all five
- Page 171 and 172: N T I S20105.5. Combining Investmen
- Page 174 and 175: Chapter 6Trade FacilitationN T I S2
- Page 176 and 177: N T I S2010In the 2005 Trade Facili
- Page 178 and 179: N T I S2010The latest phase of impl
- Page 180: N T I S2010improve efficiency. Few
- Page 183 and 184: N T I S2010Figure 7.1Future Organog
- Page 185 and 186: N T I S2010EU countries, special pr
- Page 187 and 188: N T I S2010Act 1980. So far, 130 fi
- Page 189 and 190: N T I S2010The current projects inc
- Page 191 and 192: N T I S2010The NBSM as a secretaria
- Page 193 and 194: N T I S2010Many more organizations
- Page 195 and 196: N T I S2010Table 7.8Existing Nepal
- Page 197: Table 7.9Standards Issues for Ten E
- Page 201 and 202: N T I S2010It is not clear what amo
- Page 203 and 204: N T I S2010GeneralNepal’s general
- Page 205 and 206: N T I S2010a crucial part of the PR
- Page 207 and 208: N T I S2010residue limits (MRLs) ar
- Page 209 and 210: N T I S2010The viral diseases chirk
- Page 211 and 212: N T I S2010SPS issues Affecting Tra
- Page 213 and 214: N T I S2010Indian phytosanitary sta
- Page 215 and 216: N T I S20108.5 Conclusions and Reco
- Page 217 and 218: N T I S2010Simpler requirements suc
- Page 219 and 220: Table 8.4Summary of Export Environm
- Page 221 and 222: N T I S2010To register a patent, a
- Page 223 and 224: N T I S2010breaches of law. The Nep
- Page 225 and 226: N T I S2010Intellectual Property is
- Page 228 and 229: Chapter 10Barriers to Service Trade
- Page 230 and 231: N T I S2010Constraints in the touri
- Page 232 and 233: N T I S2010Table 10.2Nepal GATS Com
- Page 234 and 235: N T I S2010locations favourable for
- Page 236 and 237: N T I S2010Barriers to Exports of H
- Page 238: N T I S2010Institutional IssueThe s
- Page 241 and 242: N T I S2010 Strengthening sub-natio
- Page 243 and 244: N T I S2010Observations from enterp
- Page 245 and 246: N T I S2010Nepal Ginger Producers a
- Page 247 and 248: N T I S2010 Helping paper manufactu
N T I S20107.14 Priority Actions and ConclusionsPriority Actions proposed under the NITS 2009 are summarized in the Action Matrix.Nepal has yet to fulfil its WTO commitments in the area <strong>of</strong> TBTs. The country is lagging behind in updating anddrafting laws, in creating institutions, and in making laws and institutions operational.Some gaps in current technical assistance programmes/projects have been identified. The need for nationalstandards for the products <strong>of</strong> export interest has been stressed. Further efforts are also to be made toaccelerate accreditation <strong>of</strong> a few major laboratories for test parameters so that they can provide conformityassessment services in Nepalese products <strong>of</strong> export interest.Establishment <strong>of</strong> a packaging material testing laboratory should also be considered.The stakeholders involved in the international trade need a more effective, transparent, useful, and specializednational enquiry point for the TBT. The GoN needs to commit greater resources, including trained anddedicated staff, to this new facility.There is a need to look into the establishment <strong>of</strong> sector-specific PPP test laboratories to serve the sectorsinvolved in international trade, as well as extending some technical support to private sector laboratories fortheir accreditation process.The current efforts to create the NBSM and DFTQC as national certification bodies have been encouraging. Inthe meantime, the private sector should also be given some opportunities to establish a few internationallyrecognized certifying bodies to cater to the needs <strong>of</strong> the trading communities. There is also a need to reviewcarefully possible conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest between the regulatory functions <strong>of</strong> the NBSM, DFTQC, and othergovernment agencies and their aim to become certification bodies.There is a need to develop coordination mechanisms among various government agencies involved instandard setting and in the implementation <strong>of</strong> technical regulations. A separate TBT coordination committeeis desirable.Nepalese industry does not fully understand the role <strong>of</strong> product standards, technical regulations and conformityassessment in global trade. Exports from Nepal face strict import requirements in export markets and many atimes face border rejections. The current efforts to create national certification body have to be stepped upand the private sector should also be given some opportunities to establish a few internationally recognizedcertifying bodies to cater to the needs <strong>of</strong> the trading communities.186NEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT