Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ...
Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ... Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ...
Chapter 6Trade FacilitationN T I S20106.1 IntroductionThe high costs associated with trade facilitation in Nepal are directly affecting the competitiveness of Nepaleseexporters. Global estimates suggest that, on average, each additional day a product is delayed prior to beingshipped reduces a country’s trade by 1 per cent. 1 On this basis, if Nepal reduced the time it took its goodsexports to reach a ship from 41 days to 33 days (the South Asia-SAFTA mean), i.e. a reduction of eight days,this would equate to increasing Nepal’s exports by around 8 per cent. 2Addressing trade facilitation is a requisite for Nepal. As a landlocked country, it must compete with its coastalneighbours and attract new investment. Time delays and time variability in shipping goods particularly affecttime-sensitive goods. This is reflected in the predominance of time-insensitive goods in Nepal’s export basket.In order for Nepal to move into new product areas it will need to make progress on lowering trade facilitationcosts.Similar to tariff cuts, improvements in trade facilitation can help reduce the cost of traded goods and canhelp increase trade flows. But unlike tariffs, trade facilitation reforms do not require regional or multilateralagreements, and countries can derive large benefits by carrying out trade facilitation reform. For example,countries with lower trade costs are consistently associated with higher foreign investment. Furthermore,improved trade facilitation regimes can improve the efficiency of customs revenue collection and increase taxrevenue.Trade facilitation refers to the simplification and harmonization of international trade procedures and theinformation flows associated with them. Accordingly, the focus of trade facilitation reform is generally on thecoordination and modernization of the processes of customs and other border agencies. This chapter focusesin part on customs reform. It also adopts a broader definition of trade facilitation to ensure it addresses other,and important, elements of the supply chain, particularly in relation to the transit of goods through India.6.2 Benchmarking Nepal’s Trade Facilitation EnvironmentComparative indicators of the costs of trading across countries provide some guidance as to the severity ofthe issue in relation to other countries and guidance as to where priority should be given. Specific businesssurveys covering trade facilitation issues in Nepal also provide insights.The World Bank’s 2010 Doing Business Survey breaks down the costs of importing and exporting an 8-footcontainer. As shown in Table 6.1, it costs US$1,764 and takes 41 days on average to export a container fromNepal. The substantive cost (50 per cent) is for inland transportation and handling, but charges for customsclearance and technical control are high for the South Asia region.1Djankov, S., Freund, C. and Pham, Cong S., “Trading on Time”, World Bank 2008.2Nicita and Hoekman in “Assessing the Doha Round: Market Access, Transaction Costs and Aid for Trade Facilitation, 2009” estimate theelasticity of trading to trading costs to be around 0.5. So if an 8 day reduction is approximated to be a 20% reduction in export costs, Nepalcould expect exports to increase by around 10%.NEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT161
N T I S2010Table 6.1Trading Across Borders from Nepal, 2010Trading Across Borders - Doing Business 2010Nepal South Asia India BangladeshDuration US$ Duration US$ Duration US$ Duration US$Nature of Export Procedures(days) Cost (days) Cost (days) Cost (days) CostDocuments preparation 14 289 8 350 14 290Customs clearance andtechnical control4 300 2 120 3 120Ports and terminal handling 4 275 3 175 5 420Inland transportation andhandling19 900 4 300 3 140Totales 41 1764 32.4 1364 17 945 25 970Duration US$ Duration US$ Duration US$ Duration US$Nature of Import Procedures(days) Cost (days) Cost (days) Cost (days) CostDocuments preparation 14 300 8 390 20 455Customs clearance andtechnical control5 300 4 120 3 135Ports and terminal handling 4 275 6 200 4 585Inland transportation and12 950 3 250 2 200handlingTotales 35 1825 32.2 1509 21 960 29 1375Source: World Bank, Doing Business 2010The Enabling Trade Index developed by the World Economic Forum 3 for 2009 ranks Nepal 119th (out of 121)in terms of efficiency of customs administration. The index measures the burden of customs procedures, aswell as the extent of services provided by the customs and border agencies. Nepal also ranks poorly in termsof availability and quality of transport services in the Enabling Trade Index. The country performs particularlybadly on the ease and affordability of shipment and the competence of the logistics industry (ranked 112thand 105th out of 121 respectively), far behind India, which is a good performer in the region. The LogisticPerformance Index 2007 provides additional indicators for the logistics sector. Nepal scores low in terms oflogistics competence and the effectiveness and efficiency of the clearance process by the customs and bordercontrol agencies.Table 6.2Enabling Trade Facilitation Environment in Nepal, 2007Availability and quality of transport services Nepal India Bangladesh Sri Lanka PakistanEase and affordability of shipment 112 [2.1] 39 [3.1] 89 [2.5] 101 [2.3] 66 [2.7]Competence of the logistics industry 105 [2.1] 31 [3.3] 92 [2.3] 77 [2.5] 61 [2.7]Ability and ease of tracking 92 [2.3] 42 [3.0] 81 [2.5] 71 [2.6] 72 [2.6]Timeliness of shipments reaching destination 98 [2.8] 46 [3.5] 53 [3.3] 100 [2.7] 81 [2.9]Source: World Economic Forum, The Global Enabling Trade Report 2009Note: Rank out 121 countries scores in parentheses 1 low, 5 high3World Economic Forum, The Global Enabling Trade Report 2009.162NEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT
- Page 122 and 123: N T I S201017) Education ServicesBa
- Page 124 and 125: N T I S2010should be interpreted ca
- Page 126 and 127: N T I S2010foreign students. The me
- Page 128 and 129: N T I S2010Under mode 4 (presence o
- Page 130 and 131: N T I S2010Index 4: Socio-economic
- Page 132 and 133: N T I S2010generate revenue of US$3
- Page 134 and 135: N T I S2010monopsony power. Several
- Page 136 and 137: N T I S2010The possibility of direc
- Page 138 and 139: N T I S2010Dairy Products, specific
- Page 140 and 141: Chapter 3Access to the Indian Marke
- Page 142 and 143: N T I S2010The Nepal-India Trade Tr
- Page 144 and 145: N T I S2010Most issues reported abo
- Page 146 and 147: N T I S2010Nepalese Domestic Issues
- Page 148 and 149: N T I S2010India’s view is that t
- Page 150 and 151: Chapter 4Access to the Chinese Mark
- Page 152 and 153: N T I S2010products must be wholly
- Page 154 and 155: N T I S2010The findings discussed h
- Page 156 and 157: N T I S20104.5 Other Impediments to
- Page 158: N T I S20104.7 Recommendations: Cha
- Page 161 and 162: N T I S2010inflow between 2000 and
- Page 163 and 164: N T I S2010Industrial Parks and SEZ
- Page 165 and 166: N T I S2010Lack of up-to-date polic
- Page 167 and 168: N T I S2010Apart from the critical
- Page 169 and 170: N T I S2010capabilities in all five
- Page 171 and 172: N T I S20105.5. Combining Investmen
- Page 176 and 177: N T I S2010In the 2005 Trade Facili
- Page 178 and 179: N T I S2010The latest phase of impl
- Page 180: N T I S2010improve efficiency. Few
- Page 183 and 184: N T I S2010Figure 7.1Future Organog
- Page 185 and 186: N T I S2010EU countries, special pr
- Page 187 and 188: N T I S2010Act 1980. So far, 130 fi
- Page 189 and 190: N T I S2010The current projects inc
- Page 191 and 192: N T I S2010The NBSM as a secretaria
- Page 193 and 194: N T I S2010Many more organizations
- Page 195 and 196: N T I S2010Table 7.8Existing Nepal
- Page 197 and 198: Table 7.9Standards Issues for Ten E
- Page 199 and 200: N T I S20107.14 Priority Actions an
- Page 201 and 202: N T I S2010It is not clear what amo
- Page 203 and 204: N T I S2010GeneralNepal’s general
- Page 205 and 206: N T I S2010a crucial part of the PR
- Page 207 and 208: N T I S2010residue limits (MRLs) ar
- Page 209 and 210: N T I S2010The viral diseases chirk
- Page 211 and 212: N T I S2010SPS issues Affecting Tra
- Page 213 and 214: N T I S2010Indian phytosanitary sta
- Page 215 and 216: N T I S20108.5 Conclusions and Reco
- Page 217 and 218: N T I S2010Simpler requirements suc
- Page 219 and 220: Table 8.4Summary of Export Environm
- Page 221 and 222: N T I S2010To register a patent, a
Chapter 6Trade FacilitationN T I S20106.1 IntroductionThe high costs associated with trade facilitation in Nepal are directly affecting the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> Nepaleseexporters. Global estimates suggest that, on average, each additional day a product is delayed prior to beingshipped reduces a country’s trade by 1 per cent. 1 On this basis, if Nepal reduced the time it took its goodsexports to reach a ship from 41 days to 33 days (the South Asia-SAFTA mean), i.e. a reduction <strong>of</strong> eight days,this would equate to increasing Nepal’s exports by around 8 per cent. 2Addressing trade facilitation is a requisite for Nepal. As a landlocked country, it must compete with its coastalneighbours and attract new investment. Time delays and time variability in shipping goods particularly affecttime-sensitive goods. This is reflected in the predominance <strong>of</strong> time-insensitive goods in Nepal’s export basket.In order for Nepal to move into new product areas it will need to make progress on lowering trade facilitationcosts.Similar to tariff cuts, improvements in trade facilitation can help reduce the cost <strong>of</strong> traded goods and canhelp increase trade flows. But unlike tariffs, trade facilitation reforms do not require regional or multilateralagreements, and countries can derive large benefits by carrying out trade facilitation reform. For example,countries with lower trade costs are consistently associated with higher foreign investment. Furthermore,improved trade facilitation regimes can improve the efficiency <strong>of</strong> customs revenue collection and increase taxrevenue.Trade facilitation refers to the simplification and harmonization <strong>of</strong> international trade procedures and theinformation flows associated with them. Accordingly, the focus <strong>of</strong> trade facilitation reform is generally on thecoordination and modernization <strong>of</strong> the processes <strong>of</strong> customs and other border agencies. This chapter focusesin part on customs reform. It also adopts a broader definition <strong>of</strong> trade facilitation to ensure it addresses other,and important, elements <strong>of</strong> the supply chain, particularly in relation to the transit <strong>of</strong> goods through India.6.2 Benchmarking Nepal’s Trade Facilitation EnvironmentComparative indicators <strong>of</strong> the costs <strong>of</strong> trading across countries provide some guidance as to the severity <strong>of</strong>the issue in relation to other countries and guidance as to where priority should be given. Specific businesssurveys covering trade facilitation issues in Nepal also provide insights.The World Bank’s 2010 Doing Business Survey breaks down the costs <strong>of</strong> importing and exporting an 8-footcontainer. As shown in Table 6.1, it costs US$1,764 and takes 41 days on average to export a container fromNepal. The substantive cost (50 per cent) is for inland transportation and handling, but charges for customsclearance and technical control are high for the South Asia region.1Djankov, S., Freund, C. and Pham, Cong S., “Trading on Time”, World Bank 2008.2Nicita and Hoekman in “Assessing the Doha Round: Market Access, Transaction Costs and Aid for Trade Facilitation, 2009” estimate theelasticity <strong>of</strong> trading to trading costs to be around 0.5. So if an 8 day reduction is approximated to be a 20% reduction in export costs, Nepalcould expect exports to increase by around 10%.NEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT161