Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ...
Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ... Ministry of Commerce And Supplies - Enhanced Integrated ...
N T I S2010The Nepal-India Trade Treaty was renewed in March 2007. It provides for rules of origin criteria with theinclusion of value addition requirements and changes in the Harmonized System Code of manufacturedarticles as the qualifying clauses for duty-free access to the Indian market. The list of insufficient workingin manufacturing process has also been provided in the qualification clauses. Four products (vegetable fat,acrylic yarn, copper products, and zinc oxide) have been included again under a tariff rate quota system.Safeguard provisions were introduced for the first time in the Nepal-India Trade Treaty in 2002 and they wereincluded as a separate protocol to Article IX of the 2007 treaty. The treaty is effective until March 2012.Nepal acceded to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2004 and also joined the regional tradingarrangements of South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) and Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technicaland Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC). Similarly, the country participated in Asia Pacific Trade Agreement(APTA) as an observer of this trading bloc. With the advent of SAFTA and BIMSTEC, Nepal is bound to reduceits tariff rate with member countries of these trading blocs according to the provision of the respectiveagreements. Currently, Nepalese manufactured commodities enjoy duty-free access to Indian markets ona non-reciprocal basis. Trade treaty obliges both parties to provide unconditionally to each other treatmentnot less than favourable than that accorded to any third country with respect to customs duties and charges,import regulations, and quantitative restrictions.In addition, India is bound to provide preference to the products of other countries under the framework ofregional trading arrangements and bilateral free trade area agreements. The country is bound to reduce itsMost Favoured Nation tariff rates due to its bilateral agreements with some of the neighbouring countriesand as a member of the various regional trading arrangements. Besides, India has introduced Duty-FreeTariff Preferences Scheme for all Least Developed Countries around the world with a commitment of givingduty-free access to them over the next five-year period. It has already signed Free Trade Area agreementswith Singapore, Thailand, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and some Latin Americancountries like Brazil and Peru. India will also provide tariff preferences to SAFTA, BIMSTEC, and APTA countries,which of course will result in preference erosion for Nepalese exports to India. The paradox arising fromthis complex web of India’s bilateral and regional preferential trading arrangements is that, comparativelyspeaking, India would have enjoyed a higher degree of preference for its exports to Nepal than what Nepaleseproducts could enjoy on the Indian market vis-à-vis their non-Indian competitors.In view of the above facts, the two countries commenced negotiations in order to find a solution to this‘paradox’, although, technically speaking, the treaty was to expire only in 2012. As a result of these negotiations,a draft new Treaty of Trade and draft Agreement on Unauthorized Trade were finalized and initialled in August2009. The new Treaty of Trade (valid for seven years) and new Agreement to Control Unauthorized Trade (alsovalid for seven years) between the two countries were signed in October 2009.3.3 NTBs Constraining Nepal-India TradeThe following categories of NTBs were analysed through discussions with business executives, businessassociations, and government officials in both countries: Import policies such as import charges other than tariffs, quantitative restrictions, import licensing, andcustoms barriers; Standards-related measures, including standards, technical regulations, and conformity assessmentprocedures; Government procurement restrictions such as ‘buy national’ policies and closed bidding;NEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT129
N T I S2010 Export subsidies such as export financing on preferential terms and agricultural export subsidies thatdisplace exports in third country markets; Weak intellectual property protection such as inadequate patent, copyright, and trademark regimes; Barriers to trade in services such as limits on the range of financial services offered by foreign financialinstitutions, regulation of international data flows, restrictions on the use of data processing, quotas onimports of foreign films, and barriers to the provision of services by professionals; Investment barriers such as limitations on foreign equity participation and on access to foreigngovernment-funded research and development consortia; local content, technology transfer, andexport performance requirements; and restrictions on repatriation of earnings, capital, fees, androyalties; Government-tolerated anti-competitive conduct of state-owned or private firms that restricts the saleor purchase goods or services in the foreign country’s markets such as cartels, abuse of dominantpositions, monopolies of state intervention agencies; Trade restrictions affecting electronic commerce, including tariff and non-tariff measures, burdensomeand discriminatory regulations and standards, and discriminatory taxation;The findings discussed here are divided into ‘Generic Issues’ and ‘Sector-specific Issues’ focusing on the issuesaffecting some of the Export Potential Sectors identified in Chapter 2.Generic IssuesImport Policies Nepalese manufacturing products that are accompanied by certificates of origin get customs-freeprivileges (facilitated customs clearance). The current treaty is not clear about the export procedure forNepalese products other than manufacturing products and primary products. For example, it appearsthat Nepalese handicraft products (which are neither primary products nor manufactured ones) haveto pay customs duties to enter India; Weak formal border infrastructure is an impediment to formal trade. Out of 22 official border crossings(27 in the new agreement), only three have quarantine check facilities and only two have food testingfacilities on the Indian side. They also appear not to be sufficiently equipped; Not all 27 recognized border crossings are authorized to clear all kinds of cargo. Indian customs appearto allow clearance of specific products only through designated border crossings. This practice limitstrade performance and adds cost to Nepalese exports; Currently, only the Kolkota Port is allowed for transit of Nepalese products to sea. Transit to Bangladeshand Bhutan via India is provided through land routes. Nepal’s long-standing request for additional portfacilities on India’s western coast for west-bound cargo is still under consideration. Port facility toNepal from Vishakhapatnam (also in the east and 400 km far from Kolkata) was agreed in August 2009,but it has yet to be formalized; Only one of the 27 crossings is connected by Indian Railways. The procedures agreed for the movementof Nepalese cargo by rail are complicated. Not all types of bilateral cargo (i.e. open cargo and liquidcargo) are allowed by rail; Collection of a variety of allegedly arbitrary additional duties by Indian customs can cause damageto Nepalese exports and add to the unpredictability, unreliability, and intrinsic instability of traderelations; The lack of clarity and transparency by Indian authorities in the notification or interpretation ofapplicable rules, procedures, and customs duties often hampers Nepalese exports. It takes on averagethree to six months for Nepal to get clarification when confusing new rules are notified in India.130NEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT
- Page 92 and 93: N T I S201012345678910# Name of Ste
- Page 94 and 95: N T I S2010Export Prospect: Accordi
- Page 96 and 97: N T I S2010Gender Impact: Female wo
- Page 98 and 99: N T I S2010The value added of those
- Page 100 and 101: N T I S2010sheep population, which
- Page 102 and 103: N T I S201013) TourismBackgroundTou
- Page 104 and 105: N T I S2010Index 2: World Market Co
- Page 106 and 107: N T I S2010There are also about 24
- Page 108 and 109: N T I S2010Index 1: Export Performa
- Page 110 and 111: N T I S2010Index 2: World Market Co
- Page 112 and 113: N T I S2010Contribution to Skill De
- Page 114 and 115: N T I S2010Types of Exported Servic
- Page 116 and 117: N T I S2010Cost and Quality of Infr
- Page 118 and 119: N T I S201016) Health ServicesBackg
- Page 120 and 121: N T I S2010medical services are bei
- Page 122 and 123: N T I S201017) Education ServicesBa
- Page 124 and 125: N T I S2010should be interpreted ca
- Page 126 and 127: N T I S2010foreign students. The me
- Page 128 and 129: N T I S2010Under mode 4 (presence o
- Page 130 and 131: N T I S2010Index 4: Socio-economic
- Page 132 and 133: N T I S2010generate revenue of US$3
- Page 134 and 135: N T I S2010monopsony power. Several
- Page 136 and 137: N T I S2010The possibility of direc
- Page 138 and 139: N T I S2010Dairy Products, specific
- Page 140 and 141: Chapter 3Access to the Indian Marke
- Page 144 and 145: N T I S2010Most issues reported abo
- Page 146 and 147: N T I S2010Nepalese Domestic Issues
- Page 148 and 149: N T I S2010India’s view is that t
- Page 150 and 151: Chapter 4Access to the Chinese Mark
- Page 152 and 153: N T I S2010products must be wholly
- Page 154 and 155: N T I S2010The findings discussed h
- Page 156 and 157: N T I S20104.5 Other Impediments to
- Page 158: N T I S20104.7 Recommendations: Cha
- Page 161 and 162: N T I S2010inflow between 2000 and
- Page 163 and 164: N T I S2010Industrial Parks and SEZ
- Page 165 and 166: N T I S2010Lack of up-to-date polic
- Page 167 and 168: N T I S2010Apart from the critical
- Page 169 and 170: N T I S2010capabilities in all five
- Page 171 and 172: N T I S20105.5. Combining Investmen
- Page 174 and 175: Chapter 6Trade FacilitationN T I S2
- Page 176 and 177: N T I S2010In the 2005 Trade Facili
- Page 178 and 179: N T I S2010The latest phase of impl
- Page 180: N T I S2010improve efficiency. Few
- Page 183 and 184: N T I S2010Figure 7.1Future Organog
- Page 185 and 186: N T I S2010EU countries, special pr
- Page 187 and 188: N T I S2010Act 1980. So far, 130 fi
- Page 189 and 190: N T I S2010The current projects inc
- Page 191 and 192: N T I S2010The NBSM as a secretaria
N T I S2010The Nepal-India Trade Treaty was renewed in March 2007. It provides for rules <strong>of</strong> origin criteria with theinclusion <strong>of</strong> value addition requirements and changes in the Harmonized System Code <strong>of</strong> manufacturedarticles as the qualifying clauses for duty-free access to the Indian market. The list <strong>of</strong> insufficient workingin manufacturing process has also been provided in the qualification clauses. Four products (vegetable fat,acrylic yarn, copper products, and zinc oxide) have been included again under a tariff rate quota system.Safeguard provisions were introduced for the first time in the Nepal-India Trade Treaty in 2002 and they wereincluded as a separate protocol to Article IX <strong>of</strong> the 2007 treaty. The treaty is effective until March 2012.Nepal acceded to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2004 and also joined the regional tradingarrangements <strong>of</strong> South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) and Bay <strong>of</strong> Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technicaland Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC). Similarly, the country participated in Asia Pacific Trade Agreement(APTA) as an observer <strong>of</strong> this trading bloc. With the advent <strong>of</strong> SAFTA and BIMSTEC, Nepal is bound to reduceits tariff rate with member countries <strong>of</strong> these trading blocs according to the provision <strong>of</strong> the respectiveagreements. Currently, Nepalese manufactured commodities enjoy duty-free access to Indian markets ona non-reciprocal basis. Trade treaty obliges both parties to provide unconditionally to each other treatmentnot less than favourable than that accorded to any third country with respect to customs duties and charges,import regulations, and quantitative restrictions.In addition, India is bound to provide preference to the products <strong>of</strong> other countries under the framework <strong>of</strong>regional trading arrangements and bilateral free trade area agreements. The country is bound to reduce itsMost Favoured Nation tariff rates due to its bilateral agreements with some <strong>of</strong> the neighbouring countriesand as a member <strong>of</strong> the various regional trading arrangements. Besides, India has introduced Duty-FreeTariff Preferences Scheme for all Least Developed Countries around the world with a commitment <strong>of</strong> givingduty-free access to them over the next five-year period. It has already signed Free Trade Area agreementswith Singapore, Thailand, and the Association <strong>of</strong> Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and some Latin Americancountries like Brazil and Peru. India will also provide tariff preferences to SAFTA, BIMSTEC, and APTA countries,which <strong>of</strong> course will result in preference erosion for Nepalese exports to India. The paradox arising fromthis complex web <strong>of</strong> India’s bilateral and regional preferential trading arrangements is that, comparativelyspeaking, India would have enjoyed a higher degree <strong>of</strong> preference for its exports to Nepal than what Nepaleseproducts could enjoy on the Indian market vis-à-vis their non-Indian competitors.In view <strong>of</strong> the above facts, the two countries commenced negotiations in order to find a solution to this‘paradox’, although, technically speaking, the treaty was to expire only in 2012. As a result <strong>of</strong> these negotiations,a draft new Treaty <strong>of</strong> Trade and draft Agreement on Unauthorized Trade were finalized and initialled in August2009. The new Treaty <strong>of</strong> Trade (valid for seven years) and new Agreement to Control Unauthorized Trade (alsovalid for seven years) between the two countries were signed in October 2009.3.3 NTBs Constraining Nepal-India TradeThe following categories <strong>of</strong> NTBs were analysed through discussions with business executives, businessassociations, and government <strong>of</strong>ficials in both countries: Import policies such as import charges other than tariffs, quantitative restrictions, import licensing, andcustoms barriers; Standards-related measures, including standards, technical regulations, and conformity assessmentprocedures; Government procurement restrictions such as ‘buy national’ policies and closed bidding;NEPAL TRADE INTEGRATION STRATEGY 2010BACKGROUND REPORT129