11.07.2015 Views

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

402<strong>User</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> for <strong>Thresholds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Classification</strong>sAppendix 20B: Additional guidance – degradation in soil20B.1 Methods for calculating DT50/90 valuesGeneral recommendationsThese recommendations are from the European Commission (EC, 2000). For the calculations of DT 50 <strong>and</strong>DT 90 values in labora<strong>to</strong>ry as well as field dissipation studies the following recommendations are given.For a sound regression analysis in calculating DT 50 , at least five sampling times are required, includingzero time.Care should be taken when using time points from near the end of soil degradation/field dissipationstudies for the calculation of DT 50/90 values, when the concentration of the remaining active substance islow (< 2–5% initial concentration), especially when concentrations are approaching the limit ofquantification for the method of analysis for non-radiolabelled studies.Experience shows that DT 50 can usually be calculated from first-order kinetics, <strong>and</strong> this is the preferredmethod. The determination coefficient r2 should be in a range between 0.85 <strong>and</strong> 1.0. In practice therewill be many cases where r2 will be lower than 0.85. In such situations is advisable <strong>to</strong> distinguishwhether a DT 50 is needed for modelling purposes or as a trigger value for further (field) studies. Sincemost models can h<strong>and</strong>le only first-order kinetics, for pragmatic reasons the determination coefficient r2 ≥In order <strong>to</strong> trigger further studies a DT 50 value can be calculated according <strong>to</strong>the best fit. If the use of first-order kinetics <strong>to</strong> calculate degradation rates results in a determinationcoefficient of r2 < 0.7, then other methods can be tested <strong>and</strong> used.As a first option, the approximation of two degradation or dissipation rates <strong>to</strong> first-order kinetics (one forthe initial part <strong>and</strong> one for the later part of the degradation or dissipation process) should be tested,which may be shown up by a hinge point in the curve. Rather simple statistical methods are available inst<strong>and</strong>ard statistical software <strong>to</strong> show this. A hinge point can arise as a result of a change in thecontribution <strong>to</strong> degradation of various processes over a period. For example, a hinge point may becaused by a significant decline of microbial activity or bioavailability in the soil or by adaptation.Therefore, the hinge point does not represent an instantaneous change in the degradation process but isthe product of the limitations of sampling intensity, <strong>and</strong> does not reflect gradual changes in processes<strong>and</strong> possible bioavailability.The results of the fit give the first-order rate coefficient as one of the two regression coefficients. TheDT 50 <strong>and</strong> DT 90 are calculated using the formulae:DT 50 = ln 2 <strong>and</strong> DT 90 = ln 10kkWhen there is a hinge point in the degradation curve, the calculation of the DT 90 is less simple, thecomplication may be taken in<strong>to</strong> account on a case-by-case basis.January 2012 EPA0109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!