11.07.2015 Views

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

363<strong>User</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> for <strong>Thresholds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Classification</strong>sThe screening test for biodegradability in seawater (OECD Test <strong>Guide</strong>line 306) may be seen as seawaterparallel <strong>to</strong> the ready biodegradability tests. Substances that reach the pass level in OECD Test <strong>Guide</strong>line306 (that is, > 70% DOC removal or > 60 theoretical oxygen dem<strong>and</strong>) may be regarded as readilybiodegradable, since the degradation potential is normally lower in seawater than in the freshwaterdegradation tests.Inherent biodegradabilityTests for inherent biodegradability are designed <strong>to</strong> assess whether a substance has any potential forbiodegradation. Examples of such tests are the OECD Test <strong>Guide</strong>lines 302A-C tests, the EU C.9 <strong>and</strong> C.12tests, <strong>and</strong> the ASTM E 1625-94 test.The basic test conditions favouring an assessment of the inherent biodegradation potential are a:prolonged exposure of the test substance <strong>to</strong> the inoculum allowing adaptation within the test period;high concentration of micro-organisms; <strong>and</strong>favourable substance/biomass ratio.A positive result in an inherent test indicates that the test substance will not persist indefinitely in theenvironment, however a rapid <strong>and</strong> complete biodegradation can not be assumed. A result demonstratingmore than 70% mineralisation indicates a potential for ultimate biodegradation, a degradation of more than20% indicates inherent, primary biodegradation, <strong>and</strong> a result of less than 20% indicates that the substance ispersistent. Thus, a negative result means that non-biodegradability (persistence) should be assumed.In many inherent biodegradability tests only the disappearance of the test substance is measured. Such aresult only demonstrates a primary biodegradability <strong>and</strong> not a <strong>to</strong>tal mineralisation. Thus, more or lesspersistent degradation products may have been formed. Primary biodegradation of a substance is noindication of ultimate degradability in the environment.The OECD inherent biodegradation tests are very different in their approach <strong>and</strong> especially, the MITI II test(OECD Test <strong>Guide</strong>line 302C) employs a concentration of inoculum that is only three times higher than in thecorresponding MITI I ready biodegradability test (OECD Test <strong>Guide</strong>line 301C). Also the Zahn-Wellens test(OECD Test <strong>Guide</strong>line 302B) is a relatively ‗weak‘ inherent test. However, although the degradation potentialin these tests is not very much stronger than in the ready biodegradability tests, the results can not beextrapolated <strong>to</strong> conditions in the ready biodegradability tests <strong>and</strong> in the aquatic environment.Aquatic simulation testsA simulation test attempts <strong>to</strong> simulate biodegradation in a specific aquatic environment. As examples of ast<strong>and</strong>ard test for simulation of degradation in the aquatic environment may be mentioned the ISO/DS14592Shake flask batch test with surface water or surface water/sediment suspensions (Nyholm <strong>and</strong> Toräng,1999), the ASTM E 1279-89(95) test on biodegradation by a shake-flask die-away method <strong>and</strong> the similarOPPTS 835.3170 test. Such test methods are often referred <strong>to</strong> as river die-away tests.The features of the tests that ensure simulation of the conditions in the aquatic environment are:use of a natural water (<strong>and</strong> sediment) sample as inoculum; <strong>and</strong>January 2012 EPA0109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!