11.07.2015 Views

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

354<strong>User</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> for <strong>Thresholds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Classification</strong>sTwenty-eight–day transformation testIf the process described in for the 7-day transformation test results in the classification of 9.1A, no furtherassessment is required as the metal compound will be classified irrespective of any further information. In allother cases, further data may have been generated through the dissolution/transformation test for 28 days inorder <strong>to</strong> show that the classification may be amended. If for poorly soluble metal compounds classified as9.1B or 9.1C or 9.1D, the dissolved metal ion concentration at the low loading rate after a <strong>to</strong>tal period of 28days is less than or equal <strong>to</strong> the long-term NOECs, then classification is removed.Particle size <strong>and</strong> surface areaParticle size, or moreover surface area, is a crucial parameter in that any variation in the size or surface areatested may cause a significant change in the levels of metals ions released in a given time window. Thus,this particle size or surface area is fixed for the purposes of the transformation test, allowing the comparativeclassifications <strong>to</strong> be based solely on the loading level. Normally, the classification data would have used thesmallest particle size marketed <strong>to</strong> determine the extent of transformation. There may be cases where datagenerated for a particular metal powder is not considered as suitable for classification of the massive forms.For example, where it can be shown that the tested powder is structurally a different material (for example,different crystallographic structure) <strong>and</strong>/or it has been produced by a special process <strong>and</strong> cannot begenerated from the massive metal, classification of the massive can be based on testing of a morerepresentative particle size or surface area, if such data are available. The powder may be classifiedseparately based on the data generated on the powder. However, in normal circumstances it is notanticipated that more than two classification proposals would be made for the same metal.Metals with a particle size smaller than the default diameter value of 1 mm can be tested on a case-by-casebasis. One example of this is where metal powders are produced by a different production technique orwhere the powders give rise <strong>to</strong> a higher dissolution (or reaction) rate than the massive form leading <strong>to</strong> amore stringent classification.The particle sizes tested depend on the substance being assessed <strong>and</strong> are shown in Table 19D.3.Table 19D.3: Particle sizes tested depend on the substance being assessedType Particle size CommentsMetal compounds Smallest representative size sold Never larger than 1 mmMetals – powdersMetals – massiveSmallest representative size sold1 mmMay need <strong>to</strong> consider different sources ifyielding different crystallographic/morphologicpropertiesDefault value may be altered if sufficientjustificationFor some forms of metals, it may be possible, using the Transformation/Dissolution Pro<strong>to</strong>col (see Appendix19G), <strong>to</strong> obtain a correlation between the concentration of the metal ion after a specified time interval as afunction of the surface area loadings of the forms tested. In such cases, it could then be possible <strong>to</strong> estimateJanuary 2012 EPA0109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!