11.07.2015 Views

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

309<strong>User</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> for <strong>Thresholds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Classification</strong>sAppendix 19D: Globally Harmonized System of <strong>Classification</strong><strong>and</strong> Labelling – additional guidance on aquatic hazard datainterpretation19D.1 IntroductionThis appendix is largely the same as the Globally Harmonized System of <strong>Classification</strong> <strong>and</strong> Labelling ofChemicals (GHS) Annex 9 guidance on aquatic hazard classification (United Nations, 2007). Changes havebeen made where necessary <strong>to</strong> refer <strong>to</strong> the Hazardous Substances <strong>and</strong> New Organisms Act 1996 (HSNOAct) aquatic classification criteria as these sometimes differ from the GHS.19D.2 Aquatic <strong>to</strong>xicityIntroductionThe basis for the identification of hazard <strong>to</strong> the aquatic environment for a substance is the aquatic <strong>to</strong>xicity ofthat substance. <strong>Classification</strong> is predicated on having <strong>to</strong>xicity data for fish, crustacea, <strong>and</strong> algae/aquatic plantavailable. These taxa are generally accepted as representative of aquatic fauna <strong>and</strong> flora for hazardidentification. Data on these particular taxa are more likely <strong>to</strong> be found because of this general acceptanceby regula<strong>to</strong>ry authorities <strong>and</strong> the chemical industry. Other information on the degradation <strong>and</strong>bioaccumulation behaviour is used <strong>to</strong> better delineate the aquatic hazard. This section describes theappropriate tests for eco<strong>to</strong>xicity, provides some basic concepts in evaluating the data <strong>and</strong> usingcombinations of testing results for classification, summarises approaches for dealing with difficultsubstances, <strong>and</strong> includes a brief discussion on interpretation of data quality.Description of testsFor classifying substances in the harmonised system, freshwater <strong>and</strong> marine species <strong>to</strong>xicity data can beconsidered as equivalent data. It should be noted that some types of substances, for example, ionisableorganic chemicals or organometallic substances may express different <strong>to</strong>xicities in freshwater <strong>and</strong> marineenvironments. Since the purpose of classification is <strong>to</strong> characterise hazard in the aquatic environment, theresult showing the highest <strong>to</strong>xicity should be chosen.The GHS criteria for determining health <strong>and</strong> environmental hazards should be test method neutral, allowingdifferent approaches as long as they are scientifically sound <strong>and</strong> validated according <strong>to</strong> internationalprocedures <strong>and</strong> criteria already referred <strong>to</strong> in existing systems for the endpoints of concern <strong>and</strong> producemutually acceptable data. According <strong>to</strong> the GHS system:Acute <strong>to</strong>xicity would normally be determined using a fish 96-hour LC50 (OECD Test <strong>Guide</strong>line 203 orequivalent), a crustacea species 48-hour EC50 (OECD Test <strong>Guide</strong>line 202 or equivalent) <strong>and</strong>/or analgal species 72- or 96-hour EC50 (OECD Test <strong>Guide</strong>line 201 or equivalent). These species areconsidered as surrogate for all aquatic organisms <strong>and</strong> data on other species such as the duckweedLemna may also be considered if the test methodology is suitable.January 2012 EPA0109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!