11.07.2015 Views

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

User Guide to Thresholds and Classification - Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

272<strong>User</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> for <strong>Thresholds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Classification</strong>savailable knowledge on related compounds.No further studies are required <strong>and</strong> the metabolite is not considered eco<strong>to</strong>xicologically relevant if themetabolite is:carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) or an inorganic compound, not being or containing a heavy metal; oran organic compound of aliphatic structure, with a chain length of four or less, which consists only ofcarbon (C), hydrogen (H), nitrogen (N) or oxygen (O) a<strong>to</strong>ms <strong>and</strong> has no ‗structures‘ or functional groupsthat are known <strong>to</strong> be of eco<strong>to</strong>xicological concern.Test data on metabolites may not be required when they are formed relatively rapidly <strong>and</strong> are short-lived, astheir <strong>to</strong>xicity may be exerted in the tests on the parent substance. Such conclusions should be supported byanalytical measurements or other justifiable arguments (for example, data from labora<strong>to</strong>ry or field studies).If there is more than one metabolite, it may be sufficient <strong>to</strong> conduct tests only with the most importantmetabolite (that is, the one with the highest concentration or the most comparable structure with the parent).Where the parent substance degrades <strong>to</strong> a more hazardous metabolite, consider the rate at which it isformed when assigning a classification <strong>to</strong> the parent substance.Metabolites in or on potential feed items have <strong>to</strong> be considered. However, apart from the generalconsiderations explained above, experimental <strong>to</strong>xicity testing is not necessary in the following cases.If the metabolite in question also appears in birds <strong>and</strong> mammals, it may be assumed that any <strong>to</strong>xiceffects would be expressed in the <strong>to</strong>xicity test with the parent compound, <strong>and</strong> that the risk from themetabolite is covered. Note that the <strong>to</strong>xicology section of the dossier or monograph always providesinformation on metabolism in rats, but not necessarily on metabolism in birds (poultry), <strong>and</strong> it cannot beassumed that the metabolic pathway in birds is identical <strong>to</strong> that in mammals.The <strong>to</strong>xicology data package may already contain mammalian <strong>to</strong>xicity tests with the metabolite. Theabsolute <strong>to</strong>xicity of the metabolite cannot be directly extrapolated from mammals <strong>to</strong> birds, but the relationcan be used as an indication that such information might be sufficient for an assessment. For example,consider the following information.LD 50 rat (parent) = 238 mg/kg,LD 50 rat (metabolite) = 680 mg/kg,LD 50 quail (parent) = 42 mg/kg.So, in rats the metabolite is 2.9 times less <strong>to</strong>xic than the parent. It is not appropriate <strong>to</strong> multiply the quailLD 50 (parent) by 2.9 because that would imply an undue level of accuracy. However, it would bereasonable in most cases <strong>to</strong> assume that also in birds the metabolite is not more <strong>to</strong>xic than the parentcompound.Should testing become necessary an acute oral study would be the first choice <strong>to</strong> serve as a bridgingstudy, that is, <strong>to</strong> compare the inherent <strong>to</strong>xicity of the metabolite with that of the parent compound.18.3. <strong>Classification</strong> of mixtures: generic guidanceJanuary 2012 EPA0109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!