Annual Report 2011 - Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group
Annual Report 2011 - Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group
Annual Report 2011 - Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
20 <strong>Mandarin</strong> <strong>Oriental</strong> International Limited<br />
Financial Review Continued<br />
Subsidiaries continued<br />
In Europe, London benefited from strong market<br />
conditions and a significant increase in food and<br />
beverage revenues from two new restaurants, leading to<br />
a 28% increase in EBITDA, when compared to 2010.<br />
<strong>Mandarin</strong> <strong>Oriental</strong>, Paris opened in June <strong>2011</strong> with<br />
pre-opening expenses charged to profit and loss of<br />
US$13 million. In the first six months of trading the<br />
hotel achieved an average rate of close to €950, with<br />
occupancy restricted by the full inventory of 138 rooms<br />
only being available from late September onwards.<br />
In Munich, strong demand resulted in EBITDA<br />
increasing by 35% in <strong>2011</strong>. In Geneva, a phased<br />
rooms renovation and a strong Swiss Franc impacted<br />
the hotel’s operating performance, although its<br />
contribution, when converted into US dollars,<br />
was similar to 2010.<br />
In The Americas, the contribution from the<br />
Washington D.C. hotel improved as a result of<br />
an increase in RevPAR.<br />
In <strong>2011</strong>, the contribution from management activities<br />
was US$32.7 million, an increase of US$14.6 million<br />
compared to 2010. This increase principally relates to<br />
US$16 million of branding fees received from the sale<br />
of The Residences at <strong>Mandarin</strong> <strong>Oriental</strong>, London.<br />
Depreciation and amortization expenses were<br />
US$49.7 million for <strong>2011</strong>, an increase of<br />
US$5.1 million from 2010, the majority of<br />
which is attributable to the new Paris hotel.<br />
Associates and joint ventures<br />
The <strong>Group</strong>’s share of results from associates and<br />
joint ventures was as follows:<br />
<strong>2011</strong> 2010<br />
US$m US$m<br />
EBITDA from associates<br />
and joint ventures<br />
Less depreciation and<br />
32.7 26.9<br />
amortization expenses (12.2 ) (11.1 )<br />
Operating profit 20.5 15.8<br />
Less net financing charges (6.3 ) (6.4 )<br />
tax<br />
Share of results of associates<br />
(4.4 ) (5.1 )<br />
and joint ventures 9.8 4.3<br />
In total, the <strong>Group</strong>’s share of EBITDA from associates<br />
and joint ventures increased by US$5.8 million or<br />
22% to US$32.7 million in <strong>2011</strong>.<br />
In Singapore, the <strong>Group</strong>’s 50%-owned hotel benefited<br />
from strong market conditions, improving its EBITDA<br />
by 34% during the year. Although overall occupancy<br />
levels improved in Bangkok in <strong>2011</strong>, the extensive<br />
floods in Thailand in the fourth quarter of the year<br />
impacted the hotel’s performance, resulting in a full<br />
year contribution in line with 2010. Kuala Lumpur’s<br />
EBITDA was largely unchanged from 2010, in a highly<br />
competitive market.<br />
In The Americas, the New York hotel maintained<br />
its competitive market position, achieving a modest<br />
increase in EBITDA contribution. In Miami,<br />
the hotel’s performance benefited from an increase<br />
in citywide demand and a 19% increase in RevPAR,<br />
leading to an improved EBITDA contribution.<br />
Depreciation and amortization expenses from<br />
associates and joint ventures were US$12.2 million,<br />
up from US$11.1 million in 2010. The <strong>Group</strong>’s share<br />
of net financing charges from associates and joint<br />
ventures was US$6.3 million, largely in line with 2010.<br />
The <strong>2011</strong> tax charge of US$4.4 million was<br />
US$0.7 million lower than last year, primarily due<br />
to the reversal of a tax asset in Bangkok which made<br />
the tax charge higher in 2010.