13.08.2012 Views

Annual Report 2011 - Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group

Annual Report 2011 - Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group

Annual Report 2011 - Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20 <strong>Mandarin</strong> <strong>Oriental</strong> International Limited<br />

Financial Review Continued<br />

Subsidiaries continued<br />

In Europe, London benefited from strong market<br />

conditions and a significant increase in food and<br />

beverage revenues from two new restaurants, leading to<br />

a 28% increase in EBITDA, when compared to 2010.<br />

<strong>Mandarin</strong> <strong>Oriental</strong>, Paris opened in June <strong>2011</strong> with<br />

pre-opening expenses charged to profit and loss of<br />

US$13 million. In the first six months of trading the<br />

hotel achieved an average rate of close to €950, with<br />

occupancy restricted by the full inventory of 138 rooms<br />

only being available from late September onwards.<br />

In Munich, strong demand resulted in EBITDA<br />

increasing by 35% in <strong>2011</strong>. In Geneva, a phased<br />

rooms renovation and a strong Swiss Franc impacted<br />

the hotel’s operating performance, although its<br />

contribution, when converted into US dollars,<br />

was similar to 2010.<br />

In The Americas, the contribution from the<br />

Washington D.C. hotel improved as a result of<br />

an increase in RevPAR.<br />

In <strong>2011</strong>, the contribution from management activities<br />

was US$32.7 million, an increase of US$14.6 million<br />

compared to 2010. This increase principally relates to<br />

US$16 million of branding fees received from the sale<br />

of The Residences at <strong>Mandarin</strong> <strong>Oriental</strong>, London.<br />

Depreciation and amortization expenses were<br />

US$49.7 million for <strong>2011</strong>, an increase of<br />

US$5.1 million from 2010, the majority of<br />

which is attributable to the new Paris hotel.<br />

Associates and joint ventures<br />

The <strong>Group</strong>’s share of results from associates and<br />

joint ventures was as follows:<br />

<strong>2011</strong> 2010<br />

US$m US$m<br />

EBITDA from associates<br />

and joint ventures<br />

Less depreciation and<br />

32.7 26.9<br />

amortization expenses (12.2 ) (11.1 )<br />

Operating profit 20.5 15.8<br />

Less net financing charges (6.3 ) (6.4 )<br />

tax<br />

Share of results of associates<br />

(4.4 ) (5.1 )<br />

and joint ventures 9.8 4.3<br />

In total, the <strong>Group</strong>’s share of EBITDA from associates<br />

and joint ventures increased by US$5.8 million or<br />

22% to US$32.7 million in <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

In Singapore, the <strong>Group</strong>’s 50%-owned hotel benefited<br />

from strong market conditions, improving its EBITDA<br />

by 34% during the year. Although overall occupancy<br />

levels improved in Bangkok in <strong>2011</strong>, the extensive<br />

floods in Thailand in the fourth quarter of the year<br />

impacted the hotel’s performance, resulting in a full<br />

year contribution in line with 2010. Kuala Lumpur’s<br />

EBITDA was largely unchanged from 2010, in a highly<br />

competitive market.<br />

In The Americas, the New York hotel maintained<br />

its competitive market position, achieving a modest<br />

increase in EBITDA contribution. In Miami,<br />

the hotel’s performance benefited from an increase<br />

in citywide demand and a 19% increase in RevPAR,<br />

leading to an improved EBITDA contribution.<br />

Depreciation and amortization expenses from<br />

associates and joint ventures were US$12.2 million,<br />

up from US$11.1 million in 2010. The <strong>Group</strong>’s share<br />

of net financing charges from associates and joint<br />

ventures was US$6.3 million, largely in line with 2010.<br />

The <strong>2011</strong> tax charge of US$4.4 million was<br />

US$0.7 million lower than last year, primarily due<br />

to the reversal of a tax asset in Bangkok which made<br />

the tax charge higher in 2010.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!