St. Elizabeth's West Campus - GSA Development of St. Elizabeths ...

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmKirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) – Vast improvement. Replacement gates at historic gates, more info helpful.Green house addition done in a darker metal, done very well.Betsy Merritt (NTHP) – Circle back and talk about what you see when you look through the gate where theflagpole is.Paul Clinch (Perkins & Will) – Gray looks like blacktop, but it will be concrete.Betsy Merritt (National Trust) – what you’re referring to is a walkway.Beth Savage (GSA) – Reestablished historic walkway.Betsy Merritt (NTHP) – I didn’t remember seeing this newBeth Savage (GSA) – Design is integrating security.Thomas Luebke (CFA) – Two rows of retractable bollards.Beth Savage (GSA) – The gates will be renewed, not restored.Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) – Along the same lines with the gates. Is this diagram inaccurate in terms ofwhere the pavement is? It would be helpful if the gates could complement each other.Tim Dennee (DCSHPO) – Gates would and will swing out?Paul Clinch (Perkins & Will) – Swing out.Thomas Luebke (CFA) – This is where the bollard thing? I’m wondering about the connections between theexisting gatehouse and the pavement. Little hard to see, there may be some other solutions.George Oberlander (NCSOM) – When will we see the signage and the lights at each of these entrances?Paul Clinch (Perkins & Will) – A month or two.Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) – The k9 location. Looked like a very lightweight tent.Paul Clinch (Perkins & Will) –It will be a carport.Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) – Taller than the wall?Paul Clinch (Perkins & Will) – No.Tim Dennee (DCSHPO) – Inner line of bollards. If outer line of bollards is usually up, but could be dropped?Page 6 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmPaul Clinch (Perkins & Will) – No. They just corrected it.Sarah Batcheler (CFA) – Two questions. One about the bollard, both of the bollard lines. Are they allretractable? We would see bollards, no bollards, and then some bollards. And this is the same on the inside.That would get back to Thomas Luebke (CFA)’s point. If you’re not retracting the ones. Would look odd tohave the bollards down, but not apparently doing anything because you can’t see the bollards in the roads.Also, character of the K9 tent, must discuss.[Paul Clinch (Perkins & Will) discusses and explains the logistics of gate 2 ground floor plan.] Sidewalk will besmaller, put bollards along here, and reduced the area of pavement there.Sarah Batcheler (CFA) – the bollards here are fine, don’t break the line and historic paths of travel, etc.Bollards are working.Thomas Luebke (CFA) – on the curb, traditional way of using bollards.Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) – size of the roof, but the fence rendering may change.Paul Clinch (Perkins & Will) – this is a view from the inner courtyards. Buildings 21, 77, 78. Basically we are“preserving gatehouses 1 and 2 and restoring certain elements” according to Beth Savage (GSA). Restorefence, windows, ironwork on top of the roof, restore the roof as necessary. Some to the north, some to theeast, will go back to what it was in 1937. Gatehouse 2. Restoring. Location for security guards, security dogs.Restore it back to what it was, as well as 78.Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) and Paul Clinch (Perkins & Will) discuss the character of the various buildings,including k9 unit house near the gate. Do k9s need to match? We need to think about how this comestogether as one composition.Paul Clinch (P+W) discusses the utility tunnels – looking at plans. Two types of tunnels. Main tunnel will runaround campus and it is not determined in this area, but the tunnel will go through there or part of a building,etc. We also will have minor tunnels connecting some of the buildings. We’re respecting the landscape, andpipe bursting, and there will be less disturbance to the trees (very noninvasive).Sarah Batcheler (CFA) – Can the tunnels be occupied?Paul Clinch (Perkins & Will) – Completely off the table.Sarah Batcheler (CFA) – Connection to the east campus, show where utility tunnel is.Paul Clinch (Perkins & Will) – Depends on development of East campus.Sarah Batcheler (CFA) – Under the road connection proposed to E campus.Page 7 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmPaul Clinch (Perkins & Will) –There will be a presentation (by Leo Daly). All conceptual at this point.V. East Campus North Parcel (DMPED/LeoDaly/WRT)Feras Qumseya (DMPED) – Presented DMPED’s “Envisioning Saint Elizabeths” power point. The vision is fora well planned mixed-use, mixed-income, walk-able, and sustainable community which is an accessible,integrated, and sustainable community. There is opportunity for federal agencies and labs and 14,000 DHSemployees by 2016. DMPED sees DHS as catalyst to create an “integrated commercialization center.”Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) – 2016 for residential? Is that private residential? On the DC part of the Eastcampus?Feras Qumseya (DMPED) - YesKirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) –People need to be able to walk to the part that’s owned by DC and the currenthistoric areas.Abigail Fiske (DHS) – 2016 is the final phase. FEMA wants to be there 2014. Our phase three is 2016.Leo Daly and WRT presented a Master Plan concepts power point. Richard Bartholomew (WRT) openedthe presentation with a focus on the three Master Plan Concepts which GSA is currently exploring for the EastCampus North Parcel. The initial concept studies show sections through the site noting that building heightmay be as high as 7 stories and maybe 8 or 9 stories in the easternmost part of the site. The Dix building isbeing used to gauge these heights. Two of the concepts have orientations of the FEMA building perpendicularto MLK and the third orients the building along MLK with mixed use development sites adjacent to the buildingsite. The synthesis of stakeholder comments is to unify the East and West Campuses. Other commentsinclude concern about FEMA as representative on MLK, Security, Cost efficiency and historic andenvironmental impacts.The three concepts are: (1) East West Bars – The FEMA building, MLK, buildings in E/W direction, which helpsfor storm, water flow. Meeting sustainable design goals. Security – shared driveway and turnaround, with aturnoff for proper screening, parking garage, checkpoints, etc. Connection between E and W campus.Pedestrian connections, gates, etc. 3D image shown as well. Diagram with scale, E campus buildings inrelation to their context. (2) Campus Reflection - Concept is to take FEMA program and break it intofreestanding buildings that reflect on historic E and W campus. Buildings 7 stories throughout. Garage to rearof equestrian barn. (3) Cluster - Building is a bit wider than DHS would prefer (they want 90 ft thick building).3 buildings – compact, but tallest. Relocate parking structure to the eastern part of the bowl, access from newroad. Because it’s a fatter site, it curves around and doesn’t allow as much private development. Followsexisting road that is already there.In the diagrams for campus connection, there is a lower level plaza for shuttle to drop off. Second is an atgradeshuttle stop on MLK with an elevator/stairs to the FEMA site. Once inside the perimeter, it’s the same asbeing inside the perimeter of the west campus. Will have to go though ID check upon arrival.Page 8 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmKirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) – For the area where the lower plaza is planned on p6, is this a historic circle?Elm circle?Richard Bartholomew (WRT) – It is not of historic significance.Question -Show what the land area is, you ID in red, but doesn’t include two cottages. The two cottages areoutside the FEMA area?Richard Bartholomew (WRT) -Yes, we’ve gone back and forth on that. We have no plans to relocate thecottages.Question - Show where the site lines are for the historic buildings that are controlled by GSA, so we knowwhat GSA controls and DC controls.Richard Bartholomew (WRT) -GSA would control FEMA building and parking structure.Abigail Fiske (DHS) - Dark red dotted perimeter goes through parking. Everything outside of that is DC.Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) - Area affected, we’ll see whichever scheme goes forward so we can all knowwhat’s what. Page 4.Abigail Fiske (DHS) - Parcel vs. what we’re doing. North Parcel area is the larger area within which GSA canbuild.Dawud Abdur-Rahman (GSA) - In terms of study for the contract, etc. we had a footprint of the area that hasbeen refined and impacted the planning parameters of the plan.Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) - Using that road, impacts, etc – it seems like the gate and VIP entrance areathat there could be synergies with using that road.Richard Bartholomew (WRT) – Things have evolved, we still need to address some things.Thomas Luebke (CFA) - We understanding DC’s need in trying to revive it as retail corridor – reality is that it’sso problematic; we need to think about it in a different way. Blank elevations facing the building, the securityrequirements, etc. Want to support larger vision. Identity of the piece and relationship with the West Campus,the scheme Campus Reflection is most successful of these concepts of a campus scheme, a cluster ofbuildings around a space. A spatial connection across MLK. It has a symbolic significance. I’d raise thatorienting on MLK is a grandiose, unfriendly image. With a space, a connection between the two campusesfrom the space, not a front door that doesn’t really exist. Impact on farm – is there a way to get the garagefrom behind that building away from the farm setting, so it could remain intact. Character needs to be talkedabout – footprint of smaller footprint has a nicer relationship with the rest of the campus. It is all really aboutscale and footprint. I did mention earlier about the perimeter security, if there’s a tunnel, how these elementsall will come together since it is a very long connection, 300 to 400 ft, enormous challenges of its own.Page 9 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmFeras Qumseya (DMPED) - I think it’s important to have an east-west connection, this entire thing looks likeone campus. It’s very important to focus a north-south connection, because we don’t want this to be a placeholder. We work, our biggest focus is to create north-south connection and we don’t see it yet to the degreethat it is done cohesively to make sure it is integrated and not a placeholder secured by a fence.Abigail Fiske (DHS) - We recognized the need for East and West campus. DC is doing on the east campusneeds to be accessible to employees and very few have parking spaces. The idea of having a pleasantwalking experience for lunch, dining facilities etc is important. We are very pleased to have retail, commercial,and restaurant. We’re very excited about it. Campus reflection shows one pedestrian entrance. We willprovide them at logical connections, one of them the predominant for the metro shuttle. DHS as a whole isvery aware as the district, and is definitely in the plans for the design.Betsy Merritt (NTHP) - Additional buildings (p. 16 and 22), yellow buildings, for commercial development.GSA parcel, or would those be part of the campus?Richard Bartholomew (WRT) – Please ignore those as those buildings don’t exist in the current plan.Tim Duffy (Leo A. Daly) - Our team has been coordinating with DC, and DC future development as buildings.We have been trying to ensure development parcels, so DC can work with developers and don’t know what willbe there.Tim Dennee (DCSHPO) - Can we call it a “horse barn?” The other thing is can we get the perimeter fenceaway from the barn and the cottage?Nancy Witherell (NCPC) – You see the horse barn from the street.Nia Francis (GSA) - The fence is abutting one of the cottages now.Tim Dennee (DCSHPO) - You may need to get on the roof, get a truck around it. There should be breathingspace for preservation, practically a maintenance space.Nia Francis (GSA) - Using the road for the FEMA campus, any concerns about using that road?[Abigail Fiske (DHS) clarifies; we would not be making use of the historic road]Tim Dennee (DCSHPO) – The district doesn’t know who they’re going to put up there. Garage goes in themiddle of a developable parcel where you might want that road. Road wants to be at the outside.Abigail Fiske (DHS) – There is significant conversation about sharing access road (near gate 2). Travel fromMLK up that road. Accessing the garage should be negotiated. They are very interested in working with us.Tim Duffy (Leo A. Daly) - Our best understanding of the meetings we’ve had with UCC and their securityrequirements to get into further detail. So how the vehicles are set up is beyond their control.Page 10 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmSarah Batcheler (CFA) – There are limitations, in terms of distance from a structure for security over the fence.It would affect some of these schemes; do you know what that number is?Ralph Casella (DHS): Some standoff required for the barn, if this is where the fence will ultimately go. Wecan work with anything outside of that 100 ft standoff. It’ll have to be flexible. That line should be straight andaway from the building.Sarah Batcheler (CFA) - The Campus Reflection scheme is what makes us most comfortable. They’re largerin scale, but they’re closer. A central space is appealing, considering how we’re not sure how the lower plaza.Front doors to buildings. The EW Bar is frightening in terms of scale, it’s, well, not quite approaching coastguard size – it’s big. Cluster scheme, that long building along MLK is problematic; it looks sort ofpharmaceutical there. It looks huge. A hybrid between the cluster and the campus – the campus scheme withthe parking garage away from the horse barn.Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) – Is the loading dock area planned on all schemes in that location? In terms ofmaking sure that historic buildings have a feasible use, the future DC development that may occur, they maybe using that road for loading access also. To cut in front of historic buildings, maybe the larger roads,between redwood and the campus, may be a more feasible location for a loading dock.Abigail Fiske (DHS) - We’re flexible on loading dock location.Richard Bartholomew (WRT) - We haven’t decided on the loading dock yet. Topographic issues we have toaddress. Whether there should be truck access between E and W campus. We have to provide a loadingtruck for the building.Nia Francis (GSA) – We are exploring both pedestrian and part of what we wanted to do today.Sarah Batcheler (CFA) – This will be very difficult, making a lower plaza work is really tough to do. As aconnection, yes. You have to be very clever about how this is done, and very sensitive about how this is done.In terms of whether it has a loop for a shuttle, or just pedestrians, I can’t make that call until I see how you’d doeither one. Shuttle coming over is a good idea if done well. It might have some negative impacts that wewould need to address. Where is the front door? The front door should not be underground. Once you’redown there, you want to get to the elevator.Abigail Fiske (DHS) – The metro shuttle would never enter the secure perimeter.Sarah Batcheler (CFA) – But it would be right there?Abigail Fiske (DHS) – Yes. When the weather’s poor, the last thing you want to do is walk through the rain.Each building has its own front door, but it’s important for DHS to become our face on MLK has to reflect DHSas a whole. Only place that is visible to the public. The face of DHS on MLK is appropriate for historic settingand DHS as an agency. Whatever the plaza should look like should not interfere.Page 11 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmVI. Historic Preservation Report/Building Preservation Plan Updates (WJE)Deborah Slaton (WJE) presented the work process and status report on the HSRs/BPPs noting that with thepreservation zoning – restoration, rehabilitation and renovation zones shown for each building withrehabilitation selected as a priority and follow the SOI standards for rehabilitation (repair instead of replace, donot destroy historic elements, etc). She then presented slides on Gatehouse 1, Buildings 21 77, 78, 26, 31, 37,49, 56/57 and 71.Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) expresses concern over construction and historical significance. Integrate theinformation.Deborah Slaton (WJE) – Responded that the HSR/BPPs are records of what is present at the time as thedesign projects move forward. Reference document for the design teams to provide them with informationabout the significance and integrity of the buildings – what remains, etc. They are descriptive rather thanprescriptive and intended to be used to inform decision making.Tammy Stidham (NPS) - How can we make this more accessible? To make the information more easilyaccessible. Perhaps a matrix to each report to provide a synopsis of the critical features – a take-away sheet.Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) – For our purposes, it would be helpful to have a package of diagrams thatshow the accepted plans, and since there weren’t a whole lot of comments, show that we’re all in agreement.Hopefully that could be used by the consultants or the construction folks. Communicate the historicimportance of the buildings for us, to the people who will be doing the physical work on the site.Joan Brierton (GSA) – I don’t think you’ll get everyone to agree, that might be very tough and beyond ourexpectations to go through something like that. We’ll always reach consensus would be pushing it too far.Deborah Slaton (WJE) – There will be an executive summary. The information is factual and guidance, notthe design development.Beth Savage (GSA) – [explains to Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) how Deborah Slaton (WJE)’s information willrelate to the design and implementation of the design on the site]Nancy Witherell (NCPC) – We need to think about the level of detail. Our review will be very limited. All ofthe signatories will need to be comfortable with how much of that is documented.VII. Shepherd Parkway/Access Road Updates (FHWA/JMA)Laura Knott (JMA) – Presented the existing conditions from the cultural landscape assessment andassociated treatment recommendations. She noted that the landscape units divided the study area in to unitsof which Shepherd Parkway was identified. She added that the southern woodland unit, defined by Anacostiafreeway, the edge of congress heights, the edge of the cloverleaf and Malcolm X. There is a collection of largePage 12 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmtrees, mostly in the upland areas of the slope unaffected by the freeway, over 30 inch depth. The Anacostiaunit, storm drains, anything within that area dates back to the 60s, and current paving of Malcolm X, originalPortland Street. Remnant includes fairly large trees. Rumors of a rifle pit, unable to locate. They were notable to locate many historic features. Alignment of Malcolm X is historic, the sloping topography has beenheavily altered, historic trees. The only historic tree in Anacostia unit in northern lobe near cloverleaf, strangelittle box in the tree nailed to the side of the tree with a wire growing into the tree. To interpret this – very fewhistoric landscape features. The recommendation is to preserve the sloping topography. Preserve as much aspossible the trees identified as historic.Betsy Merritt (NTHP) – Extra orange piece over to the right of the piece?Richard Bartholomew (WRT) – Responded that is had been farmed for a whileVIII. Memorandums of Agreement (GSA)Joan Brierton (GSA) – Lots of discussion about whereas clauses, brevity, etc. We will try to solidify andcollect those comments. A straightforward what’s already happening but what’s still happening andcommitments, etc. is where we want to go. In terms of the USCG MOA, which originally was not on theagenda today, is there anybody who wants to stay late we can talk about certain sections. We do want to stickto the schedule, completing it by Friday. I’ve had extensive conversations with Betsy Merritt (National Trust)and Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP), Nancy Witherell (NCPC) had outstanding questions. While we’re stilltogether here, I want to see what we haven’t hit. Document has been revised, we’ve gone through many draftsand recirculated those for content. And really want to bring this to closure. If there’s anything major at thispoint that folks still have on their plate worth discussing as a group, let’s use the remaining time to do that.We can recirculate a final copy, it’s for informational purposes, and we’ve incorporated the comments from youor others from your agency. Let’s stick to the real substantive issues when you’re reviewing. The structure,format, content is set.Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) – Before we leave and go after, it would be helpful to have an understanding onwhat the plan is for the project. Meeting the deadlines and signing, etc. When the next reviews occur. Also,when construction should start, how that works with FHWA’s period. What the next checkboxes are on the listof things to do.Nancy Witherell (NCPC) - No comments, but I’d like to see the revisions.Joan Brierton (GSA) – Intent, reorganization, direct quotes, clarifications, statements of fact, but thenreiterating, ensuring that through consultation after the appropriate rules and approvals, all those dates are inthe revised document, check those and there are some outstanding comments, and before we redistribute it,we will do that Tomorrow morning ideally.Nancy Witherell (NCPC) - Any conflicts about whereas clauses?Page 13 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmJoan Brierton (GSA) - No. Every document was printed out, highlighted, consolidated, there was tremendousoverlap, etc. For the long and short, the facts.We have clarified the limits of construction staging, etc. Request to reference sections as PA or document, soeasily referenced to those sections... Additional information on archeology, clarifications, request, the PA asyou remember had dispute resolution for consulting parties and cosignatories, but it was intended to read justas it read in the PA, clarifications, public access language, definitions section to best guide through thisdocument, etc. All are tracked, so [Nancy Witherell (NCPC)] will get a track.Nancy Witherell (NCPC) – Final decision, authorization from FHWA.Beth Savage (GSA) clarifies work session logistics and the structure and facilitation of the discussion. Alsomentions prioritization of the group for spending time so the group could have a better input on that.Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) – A lot of efficiencies to have longer meetings with everyone here. NCPC Jan 7,Notice to proceed Jan 15, etc.Danielle Breaux (GSA) – Do we offer up time for MOAs as opposed to presentations?Nancy Witherell (NCPC) – Since we’re usually a smaller group, but frankly outside of the agencies it’s peoplewho aren’t signatories.Betsy Merritt (NTHP) – Instead of Joan Brierton (GSA) getting 5 separate sets of comments, there would beefficiencies in all of us getting together.[Discussion of Conference Calls by Beth Savage (GSA), etc. Danielle Breaux (GSA) will send notice toeveryone, etc]Connie Doyle (CI) – Any other outstanding issues and comments?Kirstin Brinker Kulis (ACHP) – I think we’re ending 2009 on a high note! Thank you for including me in theprocess, 3 cheers for the process.Page 14 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmAttendance List12/15/09 First Name Last Name Org./Affiliation Telephone E-MailX Dawud Abdur-Rahman GSA 202 260-3368 dawud.abdur.rahman@gsa.govX Michael Abernathy GSA OIG 202-489-2031 Michael.abernathy@gsa.govTom Amoroso AndropogonRichard Bartholomew WRT 215-772-1475 rbartholomew@ph.wrtdesign.comBill Bartling Clark Construction 202-359-6964 BillBartling@clarkconstruction.comX Sarah Batcheler CFA 202-504-2200 sbatcheler@cfa.govBatcheler(CFA)Mark Bauman PriceWaterhouseCooper / 703-232-4837 mark.bauman@us.pwc.comDHSCharles Bergen McKissack & McKissack 202-256-8142 Charles.Bergen@McKissackdc.comX Danielle Breaux Turk Advisory 202-288-1298 daniellebreaux@turkadvisory.comWilliam Bresnick DHS/OGC 202-447-3545 william.bresnick@headquarters.dhs.govX Joan Brierton GSA 202-244-7917 joan.brierton@gsa.govX Kirsten Brinker Kulis ACHP 202-606-8517 kkulis@achp.govJames Byrd W8BC 202-562-1671 jbyrdw8bc@aol.comX Bob Cannon DHS 202-713-7710 robert.cannon@dhs.govJean Carroon Goody Clancy/HDR 617-262-2760 jean.carroon@goodyclancy.comBruno Carvallio Caravllio & Good 202-857-7720 brunoc@carvalliogood.comX Ralph Casella DHS 202-510-4894 ralph.casella@associates.dhs.govCharles Cheek John Milner Associates 203-354-9737 ccheek@johnmilnerassociates.comChris Cherry GSA 202-252-0024 Christopher.cherry@gsa.govMichelle Choe GSA 301-509-4358202-360-2128mchoe@proconsulting.comMichelle.choe@gsa.govMina Clark Greenhorne & O’Mara 301-982-2999 mclark@g-and-o.comX Paul Clinch Perkins+Will 312-755-4506 jpaul.clincy@perkinswill.comSam Condit McKissack & McKissack 202-347-1446 samc@mckissackdc.com202-220-0198Otto Condon XGF 202-380-3015 Otto.condon@zgf.comTerri Cooper GSA 202-205-1991 terri.cooper@gsa.govEmily Creel GSA 202-501-4209 emily.creel@gsa.govBryana Davis GSA 202-205-9754 bryana.davis@gsa.govHarry Debes GSA 202-260-9583 harry.debes@gsa.govPaula DeMuth GSA 202-708-9870 Paula.demuth@gsa.govX Tim Dennee DCSHPO 202-442-8847 Timonthy.dennee@dc.govPage 15 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmX Connie Doyle CI International 301-275-7885 cdoyle@ciinternational.com301-216-9797Tim Duffy Leo A. Daly 202-955-9191 tjduffy@leoadaly.comShapour Ebadi GSA 202-302-4672 Shapour .ebadi@gsa.govBonnie Echoles GSA 202-441-2912 bonnie.echoles@gsa.govStephanie Eiler Ch2m Hill 651-367-8543 Stephanie.eiler@ch2m.comX Jane Engvall DHS 202-447-5039 jane.engvall@dhs.gov202-591-0689Thom Ennen GSA 602 708 6278 Thom.ennen@gsa.govJon Ericson Coast Guard 202-475-5602 jon.ericson@usCoast Guard.milChristine Ewing GSA 202-504-4010 chriistine.ewing@gsa.govAaron Feldman-Gross Rhodeside & Harwell 703-683-7447 aaronfg@rhodeside-harwell.comX Abigail Fiske DHS 202-684-5595 abigail.fiske@dhs.govTom Fleming HNTB 703-253-5875 tfleming@hntb.comKim R. Ford OVP/ST 202-395-3825 kford@omb.eop.govX Jim Fortinsky GSA 202-708-5976 james.fortinsky@gsa.gov202-329-1545X Nia Francis GSA 202-205-1937 nia.francis@gsa.govX Ramon Garcia DHS 202-669-0667 ramon.garcia2@dhs.govGeraldine Gardner DCOP 202-442-8970 Geraldine.gardner@dc.govMichael Gerwin DHS 202-731-4234Steve Goley LSA 301-948-2750 sgoley@lsassociates.netJana Gross GSA 202-208-1867 Jana.gross@gsa.govSusan Gygi HNTB 703-253-5850 sgygi@hntb.comFaisal Hameed DDOT 202-671-2326 faisal.hameed@dc.govBill Hellmuth HOK 202-339-8819 bill.hellmuth@hok.comKaren Handsfeld CEQ 202-456-5242 khandsfeld@ceq.eop.govJamie Henson DDOT 202-671-1374 Jamie.henson@dc.govAlexander Hernandez NTHP 305-801-9722 alexander_hernanadez@nthp.orgAshley Howell SMA 703-354-9737 ahewell@johnmilnerassociates.comLisa Howe Goody Clancy 617-262-2760 lisa.howe@goodyclancy.comX Thomas Jester QEA 202-591-2537 tjester@quinnevans.comElizabeth Johnson GSA 202-708-7877 Elizabeth.johnson@gsa.govPage 16 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmJanet Crist Kausner 202-234-2333Jeremiah Kamerer WH Gordon 703-263-1900 jkamerer@whga.comEvelyn Kasongo DCOP 202-442-7613 evelyn.kasongo@dc.govSteve Kelley WJE 312-560-0697 skelley@wje.comTim Kerr Robinson & Associates 202-234-2333 tkerr@robinson-inc.comGiri Kilim CH2M Hill 703-376-5227 Giri.kilim@ch2m.comJim Kinkead Clark Construction 301-367-0209 jim.kinkead@clarkconstruction.comDuncan Kirk HOK 202-944-1463 duncan.kirk@hok.comDan Koenig HDRJennifer Lewis NTHP Jennifer_lewis@nthp.comJoyce Lewis DHS 202-343-4131 Joyce.lewis@dhs.govJames Lindsay CI International 202-258-1772 jlindsay@ciinternational.comFrederick Lindstrom CFA 202-504-2200 flindstrom@cfa.govWilliam Logan US Coast Guard 202-475-5635 william.g.logan@usCoast Guard.milX Thomas Luebke CFA 202-504-2200 tluebke@cfa.govX Paul Malatino GSA OIG 202-208-0021 paul.malatino@gsa.govMatt Manofsky US Coast Guard 202-372-4004 matthew.c.manofsky@usCoast Guard.milJoshua Marnitz National Trust 202-588-6485 joshua_marnitz@nthp.orgAlana McCullough PriceWaterhouseCooper / 703-855-3541 Alana.mccullough@us.pwc.comDHSX John McDaniel GSA 202-205-8893 john.mcdaniel@gsa.govRichard McDaniel FHWA 703-303-7523 richard.mcdaniel@dot.govRich McGruder DHS 202-834-4621 richard.McGruder@dhs.govJoe McNamara ZGF 202-380-3040 Joe.McNamara@zgf.comX Elizabeth Merritt National Trust 202-588-6026 betsy_merritt@nthp.org(Betsy)Rebecca Miller DCPL 202-783-5144 rebecca@dcpreservation.orgX Chris Mills DHS 202-447-5032 chris.mills@dhs.govBeate Moss DHS 202-713-7688 beate.moss@dhs.govThomas Mozina Perkins+ Will 312-755-4552 thomas.mozina@perkinswill.comRob Nieweg NTHP Robert_neiweg@nthp.orgPatricia O’Donnell Heritage Landscapes 802-425-4330 odonnell@heritagelandscapes.comRalph O’Mara-Garcia GSA 202-501-2635 ralph.omara-garcia@gsa.govGeorge Oberlander NCSOM 301-816-1153 goberlander@verizon.netPage 17 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmCarlos Ostria LSA 301-948-2750 costria@lsassociates.netThornell Page 202-258-2532Joseph Parello DHS 202-420-1971 joseph.parello@dhs.govEdward Payabyab NTHP 510-331-3865 edward_paabyab@nthp.orgX Davin Pirkola Perkins+Will 312-755-0770 davin.pirkola@perkinswill.comDennis Plouff Greenhorne & O’Mara 301-270-2607 dplouff@g-and-o.comGary Porter GSA 202-205-7766 gary.porter@gsa.govKathryn Prigmore HDR 703-518-8511 Kathryn.prigmore@hdrinc.comRob Prunty CH2M Hill 571-296-0214 Rob.prunty@ch2m.comFeras Qumseya DMPED 202-340-7264 Feras.qumseya@dc.govWilliam Randolph DHS USM/COS 202-497-5854 William.randolph@dhs.govChristine Reynolds WJE 703-641-4601 creynolds@wje.comElliot Rhodeside Rhodeside & Harwell 703-683-7447 elliotr@rhodeside-harwell.comVincent Rigg Perkins+Will 312-755-4794 vincent.rigg@perkinswill.comPeter Rizzo GSA 202-501-0940 peter.rizzo@gsa.govKevin Robbins DHS 202-525-9290 kevin.robbins@dhs.govX Judith Robinson Robinson & Associates 202-234-2333 jrobinson@robinson-inc.comKelvin Robinson Symmetra Design 202-370-6000 krobinson@symmetradesign.comJennifer Rose HDR Jennifer.rose@hdrinc.comRay Ruhlman Leo A. Daly 202-955-9108 rruhlman@leoadaly.comX Yogesh Saoji WRT 215-430-5309 ysaoji@ph.wrtdesign.comX Christine Saum NCPC 202-482-7200 christine.saum@ncpc.gov202-482-7245X Beth Savage GSA 202-208-1936 beth.savage@gsa.govKristina Schroeder FEMA 202-646-8178 Kristina.schroeder@dhs.govSteve Schwartz GSA 202-708-5905 stephen.schwartz@gsa.govDonna Siefert JMA 703-354-9737 dsiefert@johnmilnerassociates.comGary Scott NPS 202-619-7279 gary_scott@nps.govMatthew Sellers STG 703-548-2000 msellers@stepgood.comGeorge Siekkinen GSA 202-501-0150 George .siekkinen@gsa.govX Baird Smith QEA 202-591-2507 bsmith@quinnevans.com202-298-6700David Smith CHMS 202-345-3282 Pearlcoalition2chmsil.comPage 18 of 19

St. Elizabeth’s West CampusConsulting Party Meeting December 15, 2009Meeting Notes GSA ROB Room 70231:30 – 5:00 pmPatrick Solomon HDR 703-752-7755 Patrick.solomon@hdrinc.comX George Stephanos US Coast Guard 202-475-5775 George .j.stephanos@usCoast Guard.milX Tammy Stidham NPS 202-619-7474 tammy_stidham@nps.govX Stacy Stone G2O 410-583-6700 sstone@g-ond.o.comX Gill Thompson DHS 202-680-2344 gill.thompson@dhs.govMinh K. Tonthat HNTB 703-253-5952 mtonthat@hntb.comTim Tozer GSA 202-708-9882 Timothy.tozer@gsa.govJack Van Dop FHWA 703-404-6282 jack.j.vandop@fhwa.dot.govRob Walker WH Gordon 703-263-1900 rwalker@whgA.comEarl Ward US Coast Guard 434-960-5745 new3m@wirginia.eduJeff Way CI International 610-820-4455 jway@ciinternational.comNicole White Symmetra Design 202-370-6000 nwhite@symmetradesign.comBrenda Williams QEA 734-926-0419 bwilliams@quinnevans.comWilliam Willis GSA 202-441-0088 williamb.willis@gsa.govX Nancy Witherell NCPC 202-482-7239 nancy@ncpc.govX Carter Wormeley GSA 202-401-9691 carter.wormeley@gsa.govCraig Wright McKissack & McKissak 202-220-0144 craigw@mckissackdc.comMina Wright GSA 202-406-4520Tamara Zalcim Georgetown Law Tt2@law.Georgetown.eduNell Ziehl NTHP 202 588-6040 nell_ziehl@nthp.orgPage 19 of 19