Chapter 2 - University of British Columbia

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Recent studies have shown that UPD events are frequently observed in tumor genomes, with most of the findings reported from hematological malignancies [122-131]. Our genome wide analysis of segmental gain, loss and UPD in the T47D breast cancer cell line genome identified that a significant portion of the genome exhibits UPD, rivaling the proportion of the genome affected by segmental gain and loss, and highlighting the potential of UPD as a prominent mechanism of gene disruption in epithelial cancer (Figure 3). Interestingly, PIK3CA and TP53 mutations in T47D are noted in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer [132]. Integrative analysis at these loci detected copy number increase at PIK3CA and copy number loss at TP53 illustrating the MASI concept described above (Figure 3). Somatic UPD also exists at genes without mutation. The potential significance of this somatic event is not readily apparent, but it raises the intriguing possibility of allelic conversion of epigenetic status [117, 122, 133]. 5.3 Epigenomic alterations 5.3.1 The cancer methylome Abnormal DNA methylation patterns occur in cancer, whereby focal hypermethylation at many CpG islands is evident in a background of global DNA hypomethylation [134-137]. Broad hypomethylation may lead to genomic instability, while hypermethylation of CpG islands silences transcription of specific genes [136, 138-140]. Non-random methylation of multiple CpG islands observed in colon cancer led to the discovery of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), which is causally linked to microsatellite instability via silencing of the mismatch repair gene, MLH1 [141-143]. The determination of DNA methylation status relies on the ability to discriminate between methylated and unmethylated cytosines. This is achieved by exploiting methylation- sensitive/insensitive isoschizomer restriction-enzyme pairs [144-150], chemical conversion of unmethylated cytosine to uracil [151-156], and the affinity for methylated DNA of specially 117
developed antibodies and methylated-DNA binding proteins [24, 157-163]. Several computational methods have been developed for deriving approximations of actual methylation levels from the relative levels generated by most microarray and locus specific sequencing assays [147, 162, 164, 165]. However, it is important to note that CpG targets represented on microarrays may or may not be the only elements controlling gene expression. Recently, it was shown that in the human colon cancer methylome sequences up to 2 kb away from CpG islands, termed CpG shores, exhibited more methylation than CpG islands and had greater influence on gene expression than CpG islands [166]. Furthermore, while excess promoter methylation is typically associated with transcriptional repression, the loss of required methylation within gene bodies, proximal to promoters, can have the same effect [167]. DNA methylation of epigenetic neighborhoods in the megabase size range has also been reported [168]. Validation of methylation-mediated control of gene-specific expression, and evaluation of biological significance, can be achieved via pharmacologic manipulation of DNA methylation, for example by 5-azacytidine treatment, to relieve methylation silencing and invoke re-expression [20, 169]. The first single-base-resolution maps of the human methylome have recently been generated by sequencing of bisulfite converted DNA from human embryonic stem cells and fetal fibroblasts [12, 170]. This landmark study will greatly advance the analysis of DNA methylation by providing whole genome reference maps of methylation in these specific cells. However, it is well known that DNA methylation is tissue specific and that it changes throughout development thus, methylome maps for all tissues at various stages of development may be necessary to provide adequate maps of 'normal' methylation patterns for use in deciphering aberrant methylation patterns characteristic of tumors [171-176]. In recognition of this, the Human Epigenome Project was launched in 2004 to map the methylomes of all major human tissues [177]. 118
Page 1 and 2:
DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF AN I
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Abstract ........
Page 5 and 6:
3.3.2 Multi-dimensional analysis (M
Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables Table 2.1. Features
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 5.3. Overlay of chromosomal
Page 11 and 12:
RB1 Retinoblastoma 1 RNA Ribonuclei
Page 13 and 14:
Dedication To my family. xiii
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 5: Chari R, Thu KL, Wilson
Page 17 and 18:
1.1 Lung cancer Lung cancer has the
Page 19 and 20:
expression changes are reactive to
Page 21 and 22:
number of different cancer types. M
Page 23 and 24:
large number of tumors, that a give
Page 25 and 26:
(B) By using an integrative approac
Page 27 and 28:
platforms, with one of the latest s
Page 29 and 30:
1.12.1 Development of tools for gen
Page 31 and 32:
quantitative PCR experiments as wel
Page 33 and 34:
1.13 References 1. Jemal A, Siegel
Page 35 and 36:
33. Garber ME, Troyanskaya OG, Schl
Page 37 and 38:
71. Shivapurkar N, Gazdar AF: DNA M
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 2: SIGMA 2 : A system for t
Page 41 and 42:
Here, we present SIGMA 2 , a novel
Page 43 and 44:
datasets. To utilize this, the user
Page 45 and 46:
2.3.7 Analysis of data from multipl
Page 47 and 48:
expression (Figure 2.8). ERBB2 has
Page 49 and 50:
Figure 2.1 R -Segmentation -Statist
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2.3 numSamples
Page 53 and 54:
Figure 2.5. Consensus calling and h
Page 55 and 56:
Figure 2.6 HCC2218 HCC2218 HCC2218B
Page 57 and 58:
Figure 2.8. Multi-dimensional persp
Page 59 and 60:
Table 2.1. Features required for in
Page 61 and 62:
2.6 References 1. Garnis C, Buys TP
Page 63 and 64:
Chapter 3: An integrative multi-dim
Page 65 and 66:
observed gene expression deregulati
Page 67 and 68:
Raw gene expression profiles from a
Page 69 and 70:
screening approach to gene amplific
Page 71 and 72:
many regions of frequent LOH/AI do
Page 73 and 74:
approach to examining the whole gen
Page 75 and 76:
PTEN expression [44]. Using this pa
Page 77 and 78:
mechanisms at the DNA and RNA level
Page 79 and 80:
In this study, three DNA dimensions
Page 81 and 82: Figure 3.2. Quantitative and qualit
Page 83 and 84: Figure 3.3 a Proportion of genes in
Page 85 and 86: 70 Figure 3.5 -log(pvalue) 5.0 4.0
Page 87 and 88: 72 Figure 3.7 Sample: HCC1008 Copy
Page 89 and 90: Figure 3.8 a b Proportion of random
Page 91 and 92: 16. Chari R, Lockwood WW, Coe BP, C
Page 93 and 94: 50. Giovane A, Pintzas A, Maira SM,
Page 95 and 96: 4.1 Introduction Genetic alteration
Page 97 and 98: 4.2.3 Determining frequent regions
Page 99 and 100: etween loss and UPD (Figure 4.3). S
Page 101 and 102: obtained, profiled and used as the
Page 103 and 104: Figure 4.1. Detection of UPD using
Page 105 and 106: Figure 4.2. Comparison of frequent
Page 107 and 108: Figure 4.3 Gain Loss 642 441 7 Figu
Page 109 and 110: 94 Figure 4.4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Page 111 and 112: Figure 4.6 a b c Percent of cases A
Page 113 and 114: Figure 4.7 a b 6p25.3 Log2 fold cha
Page 115 and 116: Chr BPStart BPEnd # of Chr BPStart
Page 117 and 118: Table 4.3. Overlap of oncogenes in
Page 119 and 120: Table 4.5. Cell lines and oncogene
Page 121 and 122: Table 4.7. RefSeq genes in focal re
Page 123 and 124: 4.6 References 1. Bell DW: Our chan
Page 125 and 126: 33. Garnis C, Coe BP, Lam SL, MacAu
Page 127 and 128: 5.1 Introduction In the past decade
Page 129 and 130: polymorphism (SNP) arrays with over
Page 131: substitutions) and UV exposure (C t
Page 135 and 136: Histone modification states. While
Page 137 and 138: metastasis [226]. High throughput a
Page 139 and 140: Implications on sample size require
Page 141 and 142: analyzed using the "minet" package
Page 143 and 144: expression. The next challenge is t
Page 145 and 146: Figure 5.2 # of copies Total copy n
Page 147 and 148: Figure 5.4. Integration of copy num
Page 149 and 150: Figure 5.5. Integration of copy num
Page 151 and 152: Figure 5.6 SHC1 GRB2 SOS2 RRAS ER R
Page 153 and 154: Figure 5.8 a Log2 Fold Change (T vs
Page 155 and 156: Figure 5.10 (a) (b) Figure 5.10. Au
Page 157 and 158: Table 5.2. List of genomic resource
Page 159 and 160: 5.5 References 1. Pinkel D, Segrave
Page 161 and 162: 37. Oliphant A, Barker DL, Stuelpna
Page 163 and 164: 75. Selzer RR, Richmond TA, Pofahl
Page 165 and 166: 111. Melcher R, Al-Taie O, Kudlich
Page 167 and 168: 145. Takai D, Yagi Y, Wakazono K, O
Page 169 and 170: 179. Kondo M, Suzuki H, Ueda R, Osa
Page 171 and 172: alterations in human prostate cance
Page 173 and 174: 248. Xi L, Feber A, Gupta V, Wu M,
Page 175 and 176: 281. Fernandez-Ranvier GG, Weng J,
Page 177 and 178: Chapter 6: Conclusions 162
Page 179 and 180: can identify nearly three times as
Page 181 and 182: was identified in a small set of sa
Page 183 and 184:
will be done at the pathway level a
Page 185 and 186:
previously described genetic and ep
Page 187 and 188:
16. Zhang K, Li JB, Gao Y, Egli D,
Page 189 and 190:
APPENDIX I: List of publications Th
Page 191 and 192:
This publication is described in se
Page 193 and 194:
This chapter details the technologi
Page 195 and 196:
epigenetic alteration. This led to
Page 197 and 198:
This manuscript describes the curre
Page 199 and 200:
APPENDIX III: Sources of data Sampl
Page 201 and 202:
APPENDIX V: Kaplan-Meier and Oncomi
Page 203 and 204:
APPENDIX VI: Summary of Kaplan-Meie
Page 205:
University of British Columbia - Br
show all

Chapter 2 - University of British Columbia

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?