11.07.2015 Views

acknowledgements for ansi/nist-itl 1-2011 - NIST Visual Image ...

acknowledgements for ansi/nist-itl 1-2011 - NIST Visual Image ...

acknowledgements for ansi/nist-itl 1-2011 - NIST Visual Image ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ANSI/<strong>NIST</strong>-ITL 1-<strong>2011</strong> - UPDATE 2013 DRAFT VERSIONFor example, if a transaction contains one latent and multiple candidate exemplars, a featurelabeled “A” in the latent’s Type-9 feature set corresponds with the feature labeled “A” (ifpresent) in all of the exemplar Type-9 feature sets.Table 120: In<strong>for</strong>mal explanation of types of corresponding points and featuresCategory Type Code DescriptionDefinitecorrespondencePossible ordebatablecorrespondenceDefinite lack ofcorrespondenceFeaturePointDebatableFeatureDebatablePointDoes notexistFPDFDPXThe labeled feature definitely corresponds to the feature defined bythe corresponding field number / CFN and corresponding fieldoccurrence / FOC in<strong>for</strong>mation items. ( corresponding xcoordinate / CXC and corresponding Y coordinate / CYC areunused)In<strong>for</strong>mally: It definitely exists & it corresponds to this specificminutia (or dot, pore, core, etc)The labeled feature definitely corresponds to the location with thecoordinates defined in the corresponding x coordinate / CXC andcorresponding Y coordinate / CYC in<strong>for</strong>mation items.(corresponding field number / CFN and corresponding fieldoccurrence / FOC in<strong>for</strong>mation items are unused)In<strong>for</strong>mally: It definitely exists & it corresponds to this specificpoint (allows quick definition of points, rather than having todefine each feature)The labeled feature may debatably correspond to the featuredefined by the corresponding field number / CFN andcorresponding field occurrence / FOC in<strong>for</strong>mation items. (corresponding x coordinate / CXC and corresponding Ycoordinate / CYC in<strong>for</strong>mation items are unused).In<strong>for</strong>mally: It appears to correspond to this specific minutia (ordot, pore, core, etc), but it isn’t clear enough to be certain.The labeled feature may debatably correspond to the location withthe coordinates defined in the corresponding x coordinate / CXCand corresponding Y coordinate / CYC in<strong>for</strong>mation items. (corresponding field number / CFN and corresponding fieldoccurrence / FOC in<strong>for</strong>mation items are unused)In<strong>for</strong>mally: It appears to correspond to this specific point, but itisn’t clear enough to be certain.The labeled feature definitely does not exist in the impression, andthe consistency of presentation of the potentially correspondingregion is sufficient to make a definite determination.(corresponding x coordinate / CXC, corresponding Ycoordinate / CYC, corresponding field number / CFN andcorresponding field occurrence / FOC in<strong>for</strong>mation items mayoptionally be used 201 )In<strong>for</strong>mally: The feature isn’t there, and the regions correspondenough that I would be able to see it if it were there – this ispresumably a justification <strong>for</strong> an exclusion.201[2013n>] <strong>2011</strong> version stated that these are unused. It is changed in the 2013 Update to state that theymay optionally be used. [

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!