acknowledgements for ansi/nist-itl 1-2011 - NIST Visual Image ...

ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013 DRAFT VERSION8.10.44 Field 10.048: Patterned injury image description / PIID[2013d>] This is an optional field that contains subfields. Each subfield is comprised ofthe following information items. It shall not appear if the entry in Field 10.003: Imagetype / IMT is MARK. It may appear for TATTOO when the subcode is CHEMICAL,BRANDED or CUT. All other entries for Field 10.003 are acceptable. Each subfield iscomprised of the following information items:• The first information item is mandatory. It is the patterned injury code /PIC and its value is selected from the CODE column of Table 71Patterned Injury Codes.• The second information item, patterned injury image descriptive text /PIDT is Unicode text of up to 1000 characters that shall be used to describethose PIC codes marked as requiring text in Table 71 Patterned InjuryCodes.The guidelines of the American Board of Forensic Odontologists 125 should be followedin the analysis and reporting of patterned injuries that exhibit characteristics that may beconsistent with those caused by bite marks.Table 71 Patterned Injury CodesRequiresCode Description 126 TextType of injury (Multiple codes beginning with 1.May be entered)1.1 Abrasion No1.2 Artifact Yes1.3 Avulsion No1.4 Contusion (ecchymosis) No1.5 Perforation (Incision) No1.6 Laceration No1,7 Petechial hemorrhage No1.8 Other YesColor of the pattern injury 127 (Multiple color codesmay be entered – all begin with 2 )2.1 Red No2.2 Violet No2.3 Red No2.4 Violet / Magenta2.5 Blue No2.6 Purple/ Black No2.7 Blue No2.8 Green No125 [2013d>] See Section III of the American Board of Forensic Odontology Diplomates ReferenceManual. It is available at http://www.abfo.org/id_mark_guidelines.htm [] For more information about patterned injuries, see Bitemark Evidence, A Color Atlas andText, edited by Robert B.J. Dorion, CRC Press, 2012 [] For a discussion of coloration and aging of bitemarks, see Dailey JC and Bowers CM.Aging of bitemarks: A literature review. Journal of Forensic Science 1997:42(5):792-795 {