acknowledgements for ansi/nist-itl 1-2011 - NIST Visual Image ...
acknowledgements for ansi/nist-itl 1-2011 - NIST Visual Image ... acknowledgements for ansi/nist-itl 1-2011 - NIST Visual Image ...
ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013 DRAFT VERSIONsubjects between capture, such as in comparing an adult’s fingerprints with those taken asa child. In these cases the size of ridges and distances between ridges change to a greaterextent than would ordinarily be assumed in comparisons; this field acts as a flag toindicate that greater than ordinary dimensional variation should be expected inperforming subsequent comparisons.This field is to be omitted unless there is reason to believe that growth or shrinkage mayhave occurred. This field consists of two information items:• The first information item (type / TGS) is selected from the “Code” columnTable 38. It is one character.• The second information item (growth or shrinkage comment / CGS)contains optional text describing the rationale for believing that growth orshrinkage may have occurred.Table 38 Growth or shrinkage codesCodeGSBDescriptionGrowth: impression is believed to be dimensionallylarger than exemplars or other prints from the samesubject.Shrinkage: impression is believed to be dimensionallysmaller than exemplars or other prints from the samesubject.Both: impression may be dimensionally larger or smallerthan exemplars or other prints from the same subject.8.9.7.16 Field 9.320: EFS cores / CORA core is located at the focus of the innermost recurving ridge line of a ridge pattern: ifthe ridge is viewed as a section of a circle, the core is the center of that circle; if the ridgeis viewed as an ellipse or parabola, the core is the focal point of that curve. Note that thecore is not on the innermost recurving ridgeline itself.The direction of the core is away from the center of the curve. The core or cores of afingerprint are defined for all pattern classifications other than plain arches, as shown inTable 39. Cores may be marked on tented arches if an innermost recurving ridge ispresent above the delta, so that each side of the recurving ridge extends to either side ofthe delta. Plain or central pocket loop whorls will only have one core if the innermostrecurving ridge is circular, or two cores if elliptical. A circular whorl only has one coreand does not have a defined direction. Accidentals may have any number of cores.If one or more cores are present and the feature set is from a fingerprint, Field 9.307:EFS pattern classification / PAT should be defined. Note that this does not mean thatMay, 2013 DRAFT VERSION UPDATE 2013 Page 155
ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013 DRAFT VERSIONthe classification has to be known definitively, but must at least be known to the extent ofexcluding plain arches. When no cores are present, this field shall not be used. See Table117: Features and Corresponding presence fields .For palmprints or other non-fingerprint friction ridge images, any number of core-likepatterns may be defined using this field if such structures are present. Each core isdefined in a separate subfield.Table 39 Number of cores and deltas by pattern classPattern Classification Cores DeltasArchesWhorls- Plain Arch 0 0- Tented Arch 0 or 1 0 or 1- Plain Whorl 1 or 2 2- Central Pocket Loop 1 or 2 2- Double Loop 2 2- Accidental Whorl N NLoops 1 1Each subfield consists of the following information items:• The first information item (‘x’ coordinate / CXC) shall be expressed ininteger units of 10 micrometers (0.01mm).• The second information item (‘y’ coordinate / CYC) shall be expressed ininteger units of 10 micrometers (0.01mm).• The third information item (direction / CDI) is optional. This shall be set tothe average tangent direction of the two closest ridges as measured 1.63mm(0.064 inches) from the focal point. This is approximately the same as thedirection of the directrix of the best fitting parabola. The direction shall beomitted (left empty) for circular whorls, or if the direction is unknown.• The fourth information item (radius of position uncertainty / RPU) definesthe radius of a circle centered at the location (X,Y) of the core; the circle issized to include the area of other possible locations of the core, if the preciselocation cannot be determined (such as due to poor clarity). If the location isknown precisely, the radius of position uncertainty may be omitted or set to0. The radius of uncertainty is measured in integer units of 10 micrometers(0.01mm), and may overlap the edge of the image.• The fifth information item (direction uncertainty / DUY) is optional. It156
- Page 146 and 147: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 148 and 149: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 150 and 151: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 152 and 153: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 154 and 155: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 156 and 157: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 158 and 159: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 160 and 161: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 162 and 163: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 164 and 165: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 166 and 167: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 168 and 169: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 170 and 171: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 172 and 173: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 174 and 175: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 176 and 177: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 178 and 179: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 180 and 181: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 182 and 183: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 184 and 185: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 186 and 187: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 188 and 189: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 190 and 191: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 192 and 193: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 194 and 195: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 198 and 199: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 200 and 201: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 202 and 203: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 204 and 205: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 206 and 207: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 208 and 209: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 210 and 211: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 212 and 213: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 214 and 215: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 216 and 217: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 218 and 219: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 220 and 221: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 222 and 223: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 224 and 225: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 226 and 227: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 228 and 229: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 230 and 231: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 232 and 233: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 234 and 235: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 236 and 237: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 238 and 239: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 240 and 241: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 242 and 243: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
- Page 244 and 245: ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 - UPDATE 2013
ANSI/<strong>NIST</strong>-ITL 1-<strong>2011</strong> - UPDATE 2013 DRAFT VERSIONsubjects between capture, such as in comparing an adult’s fingerprints with those taken asa child. In these cases the size of ridges and distances between ridges change to a greaterextent than would ordinarily be assumed in comparisons; this field acts as a flag toindicate that greater than ordinary dimensional variation should be expected inper<strong>for</strong>ming subsequent comparisons.This field is to be omitted unless there is reason to believe that growth or shrinkage mayhave occurred. This field consists of two in<strong>for</strong>mation items:• The first in<strong>for</strong>mation item (type / TGS) is selected from the “Code” columnTable 38. It is one character.• The second in<strong>for</strong>mation item (growth or shrinkage comment / CGS)contains optional text describing the rationale <strong>for</strong> believing that growth orshrinkage may have occurred.Table 38 Growth or shrinkage codesCodeGSBDescriptionGrowth: impression is believed to be dimensionallylarger than exemplars or other prints from the samesubject.Shrinkage: impression is believed to be dimensionallysmaller than exemplars or other prints from the samesubject.Both: impression may be dimensionally larger or smallerthan exemplars or other prints from the same subject.8.9.7.16 Field 9.320: EFS cores / CORA core is located at the focus of the innermost recurving ridge line of a ridge pattern: ifthe ridge is viewed as a section of a circle, the core is the center of that circle; if the ridgeis viewed as an ellipse or parabola, the core is the focal point of that curve. Note that thecore is not on the innermost recurving ridgeline itself.The direction of the core is away from the center of the curve. The core or cores of afingerprint are defined <strong>for</strong> all pattern classifications other than plain arches, as shown inTable 39. Cores may be marked on tented arches if an innermost recurving ridge ispresent above the delta, so that each side of the recurving ridge extends to either side ofthe delta. Plain or central pocket loop whorls will only have one core if the innermostrecurving ridge is circular, or two cores if elliptical. A circular whorl only has one coreand does not have a defined direction. Accidentals may have any number of cores.If one or more cores are present and the feature set is from a fingerprint, Field 9.307:EFS pattern classification / PAT should be defined. Note that this does not mean thatMay, 2013 DRAFT VERSION UPDATE 2013 Page 155