11.07.2015 Views

Book - School of Science and Technology

Book - School of Science and Technology

Book - School of Science and Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Continuous versus intermittent operation 63Some excess capacity in the heating system is desirable in order to reduce the length <strong>of</strong>the preheating period <strong>and</strong>, with the improved st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong> insulation <strong>and</strong> lower rates <strong>of</strong>air infiltration common in modern buildings, larger plant margins are required than wasthe case hitherto. During the preheating period:. The conduction loss is reduced by the use <strong>of</strong> curtains or shutters <strong>and</strong> closed windows<strong>and</strong> doors minimise the loss due to air infiltration.. The effective output from the system is increased above the design capacity as a result <strong>of</strong> ahigher output from heat emitting equipment due to the lower temperature <strong>of</strong> the inside air.. The excess plant capacity allows operation at an elevated temperature.The combined effect <strong>of</strong> these items is illustrated in Figure 2.16, which represents a normalheating <strong>and</strong> cooling curve for a building heated intermittently. The effect <strong>of</strong> the changesnoted in the first two groups can be quite significant, as illustrated by an example related,once again, to the simple space shown in Figure 2.3.If shutters were used overnight at the windows <strong>and</strong> the air change reduced by half, thenthe heat loss might be reduced from 700 W/K to about 450 W/K. Taking an overnightinside temperature <strong>of</strong>, say, 10 C at the start <strong>of</strong> preheating, an average during that periodmight be 14 C; further, if the mean water temperature in the radiators were raised by aslittle as 5 C, then the dual effect would be to increase their output by about 20%. This is,<strong>of</strong> course, a considerable simplification <strong>of</strong> a complexproblem but it serves to show thatthe overall result might be that a preheat capacity <strong>of</strong> more than twice normal systemoutput could be available.Preheat <strong>and</strong> plant sizeIt will be obvious from what has been said that the thermal characteristics <strong>of</strong> bothbuilding <strong>and</strong> heating system, the time lag <strong>of</strong> the former <strong>and</strong> the response rate <strong>of</strong> the latter,have a pr<strong>of</strong>ound effect upon the preheat time required to restore conditions <strong>of</strong> comfort ina space after a period <strong>of</strong> shut-down. The 1986 Guide Section A9 presented data whichallowed preheat time to be established relative to values <strong>of</strong> the other variables: a roundedup summary is presented in Table 2.17. The 1999 Guide Section A5 provides a more-indepthexploration <strong>of</strong> this topic.Table 2.17 Variations in preheat timesPlant size ratio aHeavyweight structureLightweight structurePreheat (h)Quickresponse systemSlowresponse systemQuickresponse systemSlowresponse system1 3.0 ± 2.1 ±2 2.5 ± 1.6 2.33 2.1 2.6 1.5 1.74 1.9 2.3 1.4 1.55 1.7 1.9 1.2 1.46 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.2Notea Ratio <strong>of</strong> maximum plant output to design load at 20 C inside/outside. (Maximum plant output includes inherent capacity <strong>of</strong>system.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!