11.07.2015 Views

Book - School of Science and Technology

Book - School of Science and Technology

Book - School of Science and Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Continuous versus intermittent operation 61Saving in fuel compared withcontinuous heating (%)755025Hours <strong>of</strong> occupancy(7 days x 8 hours)Heavy structuresLight to mediumstructuresBuildings with nothermal capacity(very light structure)Buildings with infinitethermal capacity050 60 70 80 90 100 110Total hours <strong>of</strong> heating / weekFigure 2.15 Comparative fuel savings for different weekly heating periods, indicating the effect <strong>of</strong> thermalcapacityThe first building would cool quickly overnight <strong>and</strong>, without heating, the internaltemperature next morning would approximate to that outside. Furthermore, during aclear cloudless night, there might be a risk <strong>of</strong> condensation as the temperature <strong>of</strong> parts <strong>of</strong>the structure fell below the air temperature. Continuous heating would obviously beuneconomic in this case but, equally, a fully intermittent re gime would only be adequatein the depth <strong>of</strong> winter if a lengthy pre-occupancy boost period were provided. Theoptimum solution might be a compromise with reduced temperature night-time heating,<strong>and</strong> a minimal pre-occupancy boost.Conversely, the air temperature within the heavy building would fall only marginallyduring a winter night without a heat supply but there would be a considerable time delaythe following morning before the daytime temperature was fully recovered. Intermittentheating should, however, provide a reasonably satisfactory performance, particularly ifthere were an insulating lining added to the walls. Continuous heating, at a marginallylower but constant level over 24 hours, would also meet requirements. Economically,there might be little to choose between the alternative methods in this case.Between these two extremes lie all the buildings likely to be met in practice, be they <strong>of</strong>light, medium or heavy construction. Unfortunately, the choice between continuous orintermittent operation does not depend wholly upon the thermal response rate <strong>of</strong> thebuilding <strong>and</strong> other factors must be taken into account. These include the proportion <strong>of</strong>the 24 hours (<strong>and</strong> perhaps the week also) during which the building is occupied, whichmay vary as a result <strong>of</strong> shift-work or flexible working hours in <strong>of</strong>fices: further, the type<strong>and</strong> density <strong>of</strong> occupancy <strong>and</strong>, <strong>of</strong> course, the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the heating system willhave an influence. Some <strong>of</strong> these effects have been the subject <strong>of</strong> a report by BSRIA** Billington, N. S., Colthorpe, K. J. <strong>and</strong> Shorter, D. N., Intermittent Heating HVRA (now BSRIA) Report26, 1964.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!