11.07.2015 Views

Book - School of Science and Technology

Book - School of Science and Technology

Book - School of Science and Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Criteria for boiler selection 263output which is advantageous in terms <strong>of</strong> efficiency <strong>and</strong> avoidance <strong>of</strong> corrosion. Thesecond boiler is then brought into use during cold weather <strong>and</strong> can act as a st<strong>and</strong>by for alarge part <strong>of</strong> the year against breakdown or outage for maintenance. In the past it wasroutine to select each <strong>of</strong> two boilers to have two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the total required capacity butmore modern practice, with which the authors do not wholly agree, suggests that eachshould meet no more than half <strong>of</strong> the total requirement. For larger installations still,three, four or more boilers may be used, giving greater flexibility still since several boilersthat each have a small margin may then give almost a complete one-boiler st<strong>and</strong>by.Selection <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> individual units for a multi-boiler plant, nonetheless, is a matterfor compromise <strong>and</strong> cannot be determined wholly by a statistical approach. On the oneh<strong>and</strong>, limitation <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> spare parts to be stocked suggests the use <strong>of</strong> equallysized units, e.g. three boilers at 167 kW to meet a gross total <strong>of</strong> 500 kW. Conversely, tohold maximum combustion efficiency while meeting a load which varies with the externaltemperature, a case might be made for selecting units <strong>of</strong> unequal size, e.g. for the samegross total <strong>of</strong> 500 kW, one boiler at 100 <strong>and</strong> two at 200 kW which would provide five stepsin output instead <strong>of</strong> three.The first <strong>of</strong> these two loading arrangements would require no more than a simplesequence controller, manually reset at intervals to change the order <strong>of</strong> firing (1±2±3, 2±3±1, 3±1±2) in order to avoid undue use <strong>of</strong> any one boiler. The second example, however,would need a very much more complex sensing system with automatic though limitedpotential (<strong>and</strong> this beyond the ability <strong>of</strong> an operative to monitor) for change <strong>of</strong> sequence.The end result might be that the costs associated with an elaborate sequence arrangementwould outweigh any saving resulting from better annual combustion efficiency!Packaged modulesThe modular approach to the provision <strong>of</strong> boiler power differs from the conventional inthat it represents the provision <strong>of</strong> an array <strong>of</strong> small boiler-burner units, each <strong>of</strong> which mayhave a rating in the range <strong>of</strong> 40±100 kW dependent upon the maker. The units areassembled with their water ways connected in parallel, as Figure 10.1, so that, forinstance, an array <strong>of</strong> six 60 kW units would substitute for a single large boiler rated at360 kW. The principal gain arising from such an arrangement is in flexibility to meetvariable loads at high efficiency. For the example quoted, if only one <strong>of</strong> the units were tobe fired then the turn-down ratio would be 6:1 at approximately the same efficiency as if allunits were in use.Boiler sequence controllerFlowBoilermodulesSensorFigure 10.1 Typical pipework arrangements for modular boilersReversed return

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!