11.07.2015 Views

Book - School of Science and Technology

Book - School of Science and Technology

Book - School of Science and Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

242 Piping design for indirect heating systemsG 22.14 10.7H 22.76 13.8J 23.79 18.9The effect <strong>of</strong> the mains losses upon the heat emitters is that the full system temperaturedrop <strong>of</strong> 12 K will not be available at the individual flow <strong>and</strong> return connections to thoseheaters. Taking the two extreme examples:Heater O, temperature drops*in flow main ˆ (12 0:35)/20:71 ˆ 0:25 Kacross heater ˆ (12 20)/20:71 ˆ 11:5Kin return main ˆ (12 0:35)/20:71 ˆ 0:25 KHeater J, temperature drops*in flow main ˆ (12 1:89)/23:79 ˆ 0:95 Kacross heater ˆ (12 20)/23:79 ˆ 10:1Kin return main ˆ (12 1:89)/23:79 ˆ 0:95 KThe object <strong>of</strong> this calculation is to produce energy loadings (<strong>and</strong> hence water quantities)which will lead to the mean temperature at each heat emitter being the same throughoutthe system. Naturally, this small simple example does not show up the relative importance<strong>of</strong> mains loss as would be the case in an extensive system, but no doubt it will serve toshow the principle.It will be seen that, for a large installation involving a great many branches <strong>of</strong> differentlengths <strong>and</strong> sub-circuits <strong>of</strong> varying size, the apportionment <strong>of</strong> mains losses, if pursued toan ultimate refinement, can be a very laborious process. Various methods have beendevised to simplify this task, such as have appeared in previous editions <strong>of</strong> this book. Byway <strong>of</strong> rough compromise, if the total mains loss <strong>of</strong> one circuit from the boiler becalculated <strong>and</strong> divided by the number <strong>of</strong> branches on that circuit, even if not <strong>of</strong> uniformload, some attempt at apportionment can generally be made by sight to achieve apercentage basis which is probably not far from reality.However arrived at, the mains loss for each section is added to the emitter load <strong>of</strong> thebranch, <strong>and</strong> these are added progressively back to the boiler, or to the headers if there areseveral main circuits.. The loads which each section <strong>of</strong> main must carry are now available <strong>and</strong> the size can bejudged from a starting basis <strong>of</strong> say 100 Pa/m unit pressure drop. The length <strong>of</strong> eachsection, flow plus return, plus single resistances can be set down <strong>and</strong> a table prepared,thus, for heater J in the example.. Next come the other branches <strong>and</strong> sub-circuits. At each <strong>of</strong>f-take from the index circuitthere will be some surplus pressure available: this must be dissipated in the branchconnections, otherwise short circuiting will occur.Each branch taken in turn then becomes a fresh exercise to be retabulated as above,sizes being adjusted to absorb surplus pressure. There is <strong>of</strong> course a limit to the practicability<strong>of</strong> such adjustments since the range <strong>of</strong> commercial pipe sizes is not infinite <strong>and</strong>,because pressure loss varies with the square <strong>of</strong> the velocity, `steps' between pipe sizes arequite large. For example, take an energy flow rate <strong>of</strong> 3 kW/K <strong>and</strong> note from Figure 9.1* These are not strictly correct since the flow pipe is hotter than the return, <strong>and</strong> will thus have a slightlyhigher heat loss.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!