Technological survey on LIMS and ELN in Life Sciences - Biogenouest

More documents

Recommendations

Info

For LIMS, 6/17 (35%) have implemented an in-house solution, 1/17 (6%) acommercial solution and 1/17 (6%) an open source solution (the name of thesolutions were undisclosed by the respondents).As for the remaining contacts, 8/17 (47%) contacts have confirmed not having aLIMS in their facility.Nb. of respondents (N=17)121086420CommercialsolutionImplemented ELNOpen sourcesolutionIn housesolutionNone, butplanned inshort termNoneOtherFigure 28 – Implemented ELNThe ELN adoption is lower than the LIMS. Only 2/17 have implemented an in housesolution.10f) Factors triggering the adoption of a data management system 8Nb. of respondents (N=17)6420Figure 29 - Data management solution adoption drivers28
As indicated by the suppliers, the reasons to implement a data management systemwill differ according to the segment.For the SME segment (see Figure 29), the adoption of data management solutions isdriven by the need for internal organization (9/17) as well as securing data (9/17).‘Client need’ scored high (8/17) compared to academics. This shows that the marketand the client needs influence SME’s strategy much more than academics.g) Factors limiting the adoption of a data management system Nb. of respondents (N=17)1614121086420Figure 30 - Data management solution adoption limitationsFor SMEs the main limiting factors in adopting a data management system are:1- Cost/lack of dedicated budget (14/17)2- Lack of adapted solution (8/17) and the complexity to implement (8/17)29
Page 1 and 2: Technological <str
Page 3 and 4: ) Implemented quality standards
Page 5 and 6: Survey background 1 -‐ Backg
Page 7 and 8: Computer data management system
Page 9 and 10: The implementation of data manageme
Page 11 and 12: While the vast majority of companie
Page 13 and 14: Figure 7 - LIMS and ELN solutions13
Page 15 and 16: Usage of ELN and LIMS also depends
Page 17 and 18: - Head of platform- Head of resourc
Page 19 and 20: - Need for innovation- Design of ne
Page 21 and 22: ) Implemented quality standards
Page 23 and 24: Nb. of respondents (N=30)3025201510
Page 25 and 26: The perceived benefits of implement
Page 27: Nb. of respondents (N=17)Surveyed r
Page 31 and 32: 2 -‐ Quality system The <str
Page 33 and 34: customized solutions since they are
Page 35 and 36: Appendix 1: Online surve
Page 37 and 38: □□□□Pas de besoin actuellem
Page 39 and 40: □□□□□Avantage concurrenti
Page 49 and 50: Appendix 3: Surveyed contact li
Page 51 and 52: Appendix 4: Peer recommendations
Page 53: B$: Billion DollarsCRO: Contract Re

Technological survey on LIMS and ELN in Life Sciences - Biogenouest

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?