Technological survey on LIMS and ELN in Life Sciences - Biogenouest

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Online <strong>survey</strong>s 1 – Academic laboratories and technological core facilities (N=30) a) Positions and responsibilities of <strong>survey</strong>ed contacts (NB: the respondents could give more than one answer)Nb. of respondents (N=30)14121086420Contact positionsNb. of respondents (N=30)14121086420Contact responsibilitiesFigure 12 – Surveyed contact positions (others: quality manager, professor) andresponsibilities (Others: Technical manager, head of bio-informatics, animal facilityengineer).As shown on Figure 12, the main respondents were project managers (13/30) andengineers (12/30) with responsibilities as head of technological core facilities (13/30)and quality manager (8/30).20
) Implemented quality standards Nb. of respondents (N=30)2520151050YesNo181614121086420Figure 13 - Quality systemcurrently in useFigure 14 - Implemented quality standards70% (21/30) of the <strong>survey</strong>ed contacts currently have a quality system in place (seeFigure 13): 20/27 core facilities and 1/3 academic laboratories. In terms of qualitystandards, ISO9001 is the most common with 56% (17/30) of implementation withintechnological core facilities (16/27) and academic laboratories (1/3) (see Figure 14).c) Computer data stored Nb. of respondents (N=30)302520151050Figure 15 – Computer data stored (Other: Scientific and experimental data)Academics store different type of data and more specifically protocols andstandardized procedures (27/30) followed by equipment management information(26/30) (see Figure 15).21
Page 1 and 2: Technological <str
Page 3 and 4: ) Implemented quality standards
Page 5 and 6: Survey background 1 -‐ Backg
Page 7 and 8: Computer data management system
Page 9 and 10: The implementation of data manageme
Page 11 and 12: While the vast majority of companie
Page 13 and 14: Figure 7 - LIMS and ELN solutions13
Page 15 and 16: Usage of ELN and LIMS also depends
Page 17 and 18: - Head of platform- Head of resourc
Page 19: - Need for innovation- Design of ne
Page 23 and 24: Nb. of respondents (N=30)3025201510
Page 25 and 26: The perceived benefits of implement
Page 27 and 28: Nb. of respondents (N=17)Surveyed r
Page 29 and 30: As indicated by the suppliers, the
Page 31 and 32: 2 -‐ Quality system The <str
Page 33 and 34: customized solutions since they are
Page 35 and 36: Appendix 1: Online surve
Page 37 and 38: □□□□Pas de besoin actuellem
Page 39 and 40: □□□□□Avantage concurrenti
Page 49 and 50: Appendix 3: Surveyed contact li
Page 51 and 52: Appendix 4: Peer recommendations
Page 53: B$: Billion DollarsCRO: Contract Re

Technological survey on LIMS and ELN in Life Sciences - Biogenouest

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?