10.07.2015 Views

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of his time as a formidable cleric and this is quite true. He had religiousconvictions. People completely forget this adventure, this adventure of theaforesaid Pasteur, people forget it. People forget it and the fact of be<strong>in</strong>greduced to th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g that there is life, more or less pulsat<strong>in</strong>g life onmeteorites does not resolve the question. The fact that we do not f<strong>in</strong>d theslightest trace of life on the moon, or on Mars, does not help matters. Forwhy, <strong>in</strong> the name of what, if not <strong>in</strong> the name of a be<strong>in</strong>g that must all thesame be situated somewhere, of a be<strong>in</strong>g who might have done that explicitlylike a man, as if man who, for his part, manipulates and fiddles with th<strong>in</strong>gs,as if man all of a sudden had seen that there was an ape, an ape-God – Imean that God is supposed to ape him – as if everyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> short startedfrom that, which <strong>in</strong> fact loops the loop. Everyone knows that the ape-God,is more or less the idea that we can construct for ourselves of the idea and ofthe way <strong>in</strong> which man is born and that this is not someth<strong>in</strong>g which iscompletely satisfy<strong>in</strong>g. For why does man have what I call parl’être,namely, this way of talk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> such a fashion that nom<strong>in</strong>a non suntconsequentia rerum, <strong>in</strong> other words that there is somewhere someth<strong>in</strong>gwhich is not work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the structure as I conceive it, namely, the so calledBorromean knot.This is <strong>in</strong>deed the case, and it is worthwhile evok<strong>in</strong>g by this nameBorromean a historic date, namely, the way <strong>in</strong> which there was elucubratedthe very idea <strong>in</strong> short of structure. It is altogether strik<strong>in</strong>g to see that thismeant at the time that, if one family withdrew from a group of 3, the 2others by that very fact found themselves free, free to no longer agree withone another. Of course, this sordid aspect of this history of the Borromeansis worthwhile record<strong>in</strong>g.Not alone are names not the consequence of th<strong>in</strong>gs, but we can explicitlyaffirm the contrary. I have a grandson, I have a grandson called Luc – it is afunny idea, but it was his parents who baptised him – he is called Luc andhe says quite appropriate th<strong>in</strong>gs. He says, <strong>in</strong> short, that he strives to saywords that he does not understand, and he deduces that this is what makeshis head swell, because he has like me, - it is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce he is my96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!