Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

all be superimposed on the one who produces on the stage and I return to Bozef.And on that I end.Bozef therefore, at S(Ø) is in the position of being a Passer, but he is not in theposition of bearing witness from where he is passing. What can account for hisposition, I ask you, from where he speaks, if not this concatenation of graphs thatI have drawn for you – I unfortunately was not able to finish them – that I drewfor you on the board. If this hypothesis is true, namely, if the Passer, this writing,these graphs function as Passers in that they testified from the locus ofenunciating strictly articulated to enunciation which is the Passer, since it is notBozef? I would simply answer and I would say that fundamentally the Passer isthe writer of the one who has put in place, who has written this writing, thesegraphs. I would even say that the example, if Lacan says he never ceases passingthe pass it is perhaps for this reason; he does not cease and we can imagine thathe will never cease; he does not cease because seminar after seminar he creates,he resurrects the Passer, which is his writing, namely, that he creates theconditions of his division. He creates like Bozef at a given moment on his journeywith his back to the wall, puts himself in the place of the transmitter in order tomake himself at the same time an emitter and a transmitter in the violet arrowwhen he renounces the intermediary, Lacan, seminar after seminar, creating andrecreating his Passer, can effectively not cease to pass the pass, all the more sothat the Other to whom he addresses himself is certainly not a jury from which heexpects some sort of Amen. Yes. I imagine the negative reactions that will bethrown back at me, of saying that a writing could play the function of a Passer fora jury; I incidentally learned from Jean Clavreul, that this is a proposition that hehad made, some years ago, to think of this notion of a writing as a Passer; theobjection that will be made immediately to me is to say; to make a Passer out of awriting, effectively, is a matter then of making a report, a report why not anacademic masters? Naturally, the response that I would give immediately to thiscontradictor, would be to say that if the one who writes, if the Other to whom headdresses himself is identifiable to a jury, effectively what he will produce willeventually effectively be perhaps an excellent report but effectively academic. Ifin this writing he bears witness, as I think I have tried to do, of the locus of theway in which an enunciation and an enunciating are articulated topologically in a80