10.07.2015 Views

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

At S(O) a contradictory phenomenon takes place, which is that of a communion –the word is <strong>Lacan</strong>’s <strong>in</strong> The formations of the unconscious, you will f<strong>in</strong>d it – is thatof a communion co<strong>in</strong>cid<strong>in</strong>g with a separation between the subject and the Other.The paradox is to comprehend why it is at the moment of the dissolution of thetransference, that a certa<strong>in</strong>ty may be borne <strong>in</strong> the subject, and perhaps uniquelyat that very moment. For that I am obliged to make a rapid return back to what isthe po<strong>in</strong>t that we were at at B3-R3, the po<strong>in</strong>t of désêtre.At that po<strong>in</strong>t I would say – I am obliged because to comprehend what is thenature of the emergence of the subject <strong>in</strong> a pure state – at B3-R3, rapidly, thesubject was <strong>in</strong> a position where the primary repression had disappeared, fixed bythe look of the Real. What is go<strong>in</strong>g to allow the subject to unfix himself –remember moreover, that on the subject of fixation, Freud articulates it toprimary repression – what is go<strong>in</strong>g to allow the subject to unfix himself, what isgo<strong>in</strong>g to allow the Other which is <strong>in</strong> the Real to re<strong>in</strong>tegrate his symbolic site? It isthere moreover that the art of the analyst must make itself heard. An example:an analyser <strong>in</strong> this position, where for him the knowledge of the Other wandersaround like that <strong>in</strong> the Real, puts pressure on his analyst to see the way <strong>in</strong> whichthe analyst is go<strong>in</strong>g to manifest himself, from where he speaks, one daytelephones him to press for a rendezvous to see the reaction, the analystresponds: ‘If it were necessary, we would see one another’. The message, thesignified, has noth<strong>in</strong>g very orig<strong>in</strong>al about it, nevertheless this message has theeffect of a radical <strong>in</strong>terpretation for the analyser, the effect be<strong>in</strong>g of manag<strong>in</strong>g toreconvey to the Other <strong>in</strong> his symbolic locus, quite simply because of the syntacticarticulation, which ensured that his analyst by f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the formula ‘If it werenecessary’, by the <strong>in</strong>troduction of the ‘it’, subject<strong>in</strong>g himself as analyser to thedom<strong>in</strong>ance, to the predom<strong>in</strong>ance of the signifier.In the po<strong>in</strong>t B3-R3 where the subject has no recourse, he has no recourse ‘tocomprehend this notion of be<strong>in</strong>g without recourse’, evokes the night terrors ofthe child. Why effectively <strong>in</strong> the dark is the child <strong>in</strong> this position? I would sayprecisely that <strong>in</strong> the dark what happens for the child is that he does not have acorner to go to where he is not under the look of the Other; because <strong>in</strong> the darkthere is no little corner. And it is precisely <strong>in</strong> answer to the fact that under the74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!