the plane on the axis on the graph, on the axis of i of o; if you wish, it is a specularrelation. Another message arrives to Bozef that will be placed for its part on thetrajectory of subjectification, that I put <strong>in</strong> green, that will arrive directly thereforeon the plane through the symbolic plane. You see therefore that the importantth<strong>in</strong>g here is the fact that Bozef who was <strong>in</strong> a position of foolishness, of thefoolishness of B1, because of the <strong>in</strong>version of the message that comes back tohim, namely, this time the Other knows, is displaced. He can no longer rema<strong>in</strong> atB1, he f<strong>in</strong>ds himself at B2. And at B2, I would say that he is here <strong>in</strong> the position ofsemblance, he can still support himself <strong>in</strong> the position that I would describe asthat of duplicity s<strong>in</strong>ce at B2 he can still say to himself: ‘Yes, he knows, but he doesnot know that I know he knows’. So then I am now go<strong>in</strong>g to write, before go<strong>in</strong>gany further, the first episode on <strong>Lacan</strong>’s graph.There, the position of the Other, the message leaves from the Other; there is theego position of Bozef that I am writ<strong>in</strong>g as B1. The message starts from Bozef whogives it to the messenger who would be i of o the message that I called m1,namely, that this circuit says: he does not know. The messenger does hisbus<strong>in</strong>ess, transmits this message along this path which makes the k<strong>in</strong>g go from R1to R2. The effect start<strong>in</strong>g from there, start<strong>in</strong>g from the new position of the Otheris go<strong>in</strong>g to carry Bozef who was at B1, here an elementary subject effect what<strong>Lacan</strong> would call the signified of the Other, at the level of B2, namely, that one canalso draw this arrow.Bozef also receives a message,one might say, at the level <strong>in</strong> theaxis of o – o’ of the messenger.You see therefore that oursubject Bozef is at B2, I am nowgo<strong>in</strong>g to make, to <strong>in</strong>troduceanother graph of <strong>Lacan</strong>’s.I cont<strong>in</strong>ue therefore, I left, as yousee, Bozef at B2, be<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>edby the position of duplicity that Ihave described for you, s<strong>in</strong>ce he64
is <strong>in</strong> the position of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the idea of the ignorance of the Other. Nowth<strong>in</strong>gs, it is here that th<strong>in</strong>gs beg<strong>in</strong> to become really <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g for us and muchmore complicated. Start<strong>in</strong>g from this position B2 of Bozef, here’s what is go<strong>in</strong>g tohappen: Bozef cont<strong>in</strong>ues the operation of the transmission of his knowledge,namely, that to the messenger that I draw <strong>in</strong> the position of M2, he is go<strong>in</strong>g totransmit a second message that I call m2 and <strong>in</strong> this message he says to him: ‘Yes,he knows, but he does not know that I know’. The messenger at M2 does thesame work, retransmits this message to the k<strong>in</strong>g, the k<strong>in</strong>g passes therefore to anew knowledge, goes from R2 to R3; the knowledge of the k<strong>in</strong>g at that po<strong>in</strong>t is:‘He knows that I know that he knows that I know’; but that is someth<strong>in</strong>g thatBozef does not yet know, he will only know it when the messenger makes his lasttrip, comes back to Bozef and confides to him: ‘I told the k<strong>in</strong>g that you know thathe knows that you know that he knows’, namely, that, at this po<strong>in</strong>t Bozef whomwe have left at B2 is propelled <strong>in</strong>to a new position that I am call<strong>in</strong>g B3, start<strong>in</strong>gfrom which we are go<strong>in</strong>g to question the second graph of <strong>Lacan</strong>, <strong>in</strong> a veryparticular way and start<strong>in</strong>g from which we are go<strong>in</strong>g to beg<strong>in</strong> to be able to<strong>in</strong>troduce what is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the passe.I am therefore go<strong>in</strong>g to cont<strong>in</strong>ue, to end the schema before cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g.Here is M2, m1, m1.Bozef whom I left at B2 here (2), I replace here at B2 (1), namely, that hetransmits to M2, he transmits m2, he says to him: ‘He knows, but he does notknow that I know that he knows’. Just like earlier this message arrives at theOther also like the follow<strong>in</strong>g (2) and the return of this message to Bozef puts him<strong>in</strong> this very particular position of be<strong>in</strong>g confronted to an Other from whom he canno longer hide anyth<strong>in</strong>g. The k<strong>in</strong>g...Good, I hope that you can follow me, even though it’s a bit of a zigzag. Whathappens therefore when the k<strong>in</strong>g is at R3, namely, when he is <strong>in</strong> the position ofknow<strong>in</strong>g what I have <strong>in</strong>dicated to you and that this knowledge is known by thereturn of the messenger to Bozef, namely, that Bozef may th<strong>in</strong>k: ‘The k<strong>in</strong>g knowsthat I know that he knows that I know’. What is go<strong>in</strong>g to happen at that very65
- Page 1:
Seminar 1: Wednesday 16 November 19
- Page 5 and 6:
after all noticed that to consist m
- Page 7 and 8:
It would be enough for you to take
- Page 9 and 10:
There had therefore been a turning
- Page 11:
Supposing that we have a torus in a
- Page 15 and 16: topology encourages us to do so. Th
- Page 17 and 18: and me, and I who, in short, by din
- Page 19 and 20: we cut it in two, the front and the
- Page 21 and 22: is itself a hole and in a certain w
- Page 23 and 24: Everyone knows that this is how thi
- Page 25 and 26: Seminar 3: Wednesday 21 December 19
- Page 27 and 28: proceed to this double cut, a doubl
- Page 29 and 30: The inside and the outside in this
- Page 31 and 32: egards the structure of the body, o
- Page 33 and 34: inspired by it and its inspiration,
- Page 35 and 36: music on you, is that it has this p
- Page 37 and 38: from the beloved to the lover. What
- Page 39 and 40: that the little o-object is not uni
- Page 41 and 42: Seminar 4: Wednesday 11 January 197
- Page 43 and 44: short I called the discourses; the
- Page 45 and 46: It is flattened out, and in a way t
- Page 47 and 48: astonishes me still more, is not th
- Page 49 and 50: Seminar 5: Wednesday 18 January 197
- Page 51 and 52: see it here, namely, something that
- Page 53 and 54: namely, that everything that concer
- Page 55 and 56: Let’s see. Let us try to see here
- Page 57 and 58: - X: You can’t hear me because pr
- Page 59 and 60: Seminar 6: Wednesday 8 February 197
- Page 61 and 62: its relationship to the body that w
- Page 63: that in the position B1, would be t
- Page 67 and 68: Effectively the problem of primary
- Page 69 and 70: which I will return later, what is
- Page 71 and 72: the object of desire is not unknown
- Page 73 and 74: that he tells the truth. You see th
- Page 75 and 76: look of the Real, there is not, for
- Page 77 and 78: accentuated by him is the search fo
- Page 79 and 80: What is happening, is it not, the d
- Page 81: grounded and articulatable way, and
- Page 84 and 85: eason is said to be purloined, whil
- Page 86 and 87: Borromean knot with that of the Ima
- Page 88 and 89: Alain Didier Weill, for his part, i
- Page 90 and 91: Seminar 8: Wednesday 8 March 1977Wh
- Page 92 and 93: shouldn’t tell you, at 7.15 at Ju
- Page 94 and 95: means that the tongue fails, that,
- Page 96 and 97: of his time as a formidable cleric
- Page 98 and 99: It is very difficult not to waver o
- Page 100 and 101: I remind you that the place of semb
- Page 102 and 103: this term in the feminine, since th
- Page 104 and 105: which coincides with my experience,
- Page 106 and 107: and to put that for you in black an
- Page 108 and 109: see, does not see too great an inco
- Page 110 and 111: that exists, he says what he believ
- Page 112 and 113: In short, one must all the same rai
- Page 114 and 115:
particular besides, neurotic, a sex
- Page 116 and 117:
functioning as something else. And
- Page 118 and 119:
mean to deny? What can one deny? Th
- Page 120 and 121:
slipping from word to word, and thi
- Page 122 and 123:
Seminar 12: 17 May 1977People in th
- Page 124 and 125:
y writing. And writing only produce
- Page 126 and 127:
not pinpointed it? He calls this a