here <strong>in</strong> this first draw<strong>in</strong>g [Fig. V-1], these three circles form a Borromean knot.They form a Borromean knot, not that the first three form a Borromean knots<strong>in</strong>ce, as is implicated <strong>in</strong> the fact that the freed fourth, as I might say, the fourthelement freed should leave each of the three free. The quatresse b<strong>in</strong>dsnevertheless, start<strong>in</strong>g from the one which is the highest (black), on condition ofpass<strong>in</strong>g above the one that is highest, it will f<strong>in</strong>d itself by pass<strong>in</strong>g over the onewhich <strong>in</strong> the flatten<strong>in</strong>g out is <strong>in</strong>termediary (green), by pass<strong>in</strong>g beneath, it will f<strong>in</strong>ditself b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the three. This <strong>in</strong>deed <strong>in</strong> effect is what we see happen<strong>in</strong>g [Fig. V-7],namely, that, on condition that you see that as equivalent to the follow<strong>in</strong>g, I th<strong>in</strong>kthat you see here that it is a matter of a representation of the Real <strong>in</strong>sofar as it ishere that we have the apprehension of the Imag<strong>in</strong>ary, of the Symptom and of theSymbolic, the Symbolic on this particular occasion be<strong>in</strong>g very precisely what wemust th<strong>in</strong>k about as be<strong>in</strong>g the signifier. What does that mean? The fact is thatthe signifier on this particular occasion is a symptom, a body, namely, theImag<strong>in</strong>ary be<strong>in</strong>g dist<strong>in</strong>ct from the signified. This way of mak<strong>in</strong>g the cha<strong>in</strong>questions us about the follow<strong>in</strong>g: the fact is that the Real, namely, what on thisparticular occasion is marked here, the fact is that the Real would be veryspecially suspended on the body.54
Let’s see. Let us try to see here what would result from that, namely, that this Xwhich is at this place, would open out and that the Imag<strong>in</strong>ary would cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong>tothe Real. This <strong>in</strong>deed <strong>in</strong> effect is what happens, because bodies are onlyproduced, <strong>in</strong> the most futile fashion, as appendices of life, <strong>in</strong> other words of thatabout which Freud was speculat<strong>in</strong>g when he speaks about a germen.We f<strong>in</strong>d there around the speak<strong>in</strong>g function, someth<strong>in</strong>g which, as one might say,isolates man, of whom at this time it must be marked that it is only <strong>in</strong> function ofthe fact that there is no sexual relationship, that what we can call on thisparticular occasion language, as I might say, may supply for it. It is a fact thatblah-de-blah furnishes, furnishes what is dist<strong>in</strong>guished by the fact that there is norelationship.Yes, it would be necessary <strong>in</strong> this case that the Real, without us be<strong>in</strong>g able toknow where it stops, that we should place the Real <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uity with theImag<strong>in</strong>ary. In other words, it beg<strong>in</strong>s there somewhere right <strong>in</strong> the middle of theSymbolic. That would expla<strong>in</strong> why the Imag<strong>in</strong>ary, traced out here <strong>in</strong> red,effectively falls back <strong>in</strong>to the Symbolic, but that it is on the other hand foreign toit, as is testified by the fact that it is only man who speaks. You see here that theReal is drawn <strong>in</strong> green.Yes, I would like someone to challenge me about what today, for you, I laboriouslytried to formulate <strong>in</strong> this very unsymbolic fashion; it is someth<strong>in</strong>g that is not easyto express. I th<strong>in</strong>k that as regards what is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> this four-fold plait [Fig. V-2],it seems to me to reproduce, to reproduce very exactly what is here [Fig. V-1],55
- Page 1:
Seminar 1: Wednesday 16 November 19
- Page 5 and 6: after all noticed that to consist m
- Page 7 and 8: It would be enough for you to take
- Page 9 and 10: There had therefore been a turning
- Page 11: Supposing that we have a torus in a
- Page 15 and 16: topology encourages us to do so. Th
- Page 17 and 18: and me, and I who, in short, by din
- Page 19 and 20: we cut it in two, the front and the
- Page 21 and 22: is itself a hole and in a certain w
- Page 23 and 24: Everyone knows that this is how thi
- Page 25 and 26: Seminar 3: Wednesday 21 December 19
- Page 27 and 28: proceed to this double cut, a doubl
- Page 29 and 30: The inside and the outside in this
- Page 31 and 32: egards the structure of the body, o
- Page 33 and 34: inspired by it and its inspiration,
- Page 35 and 36: music on you, is that it has this p
- Page 37 and 38: from the beloved to the lover. What
- Page 39 and 40: that the little o-object is not uni
- Page 41 and 42: Seminar 4: Wednesday 11 January 197
- Page 43 and 44: short I called the discourses; the
- Page 45 and 46: It is flattened out, and in a way t
- Page 47 and 48: astonishes me still more, is not th
- Page 49 and 50: Seminar 5: Wednesday 18 January 197
- Page 51 and 52: see it here, namely, something that
- Page 53: namely, that everything that concer
- Page 57 and 58: - X: You can’t hear me because pr
- Page 59 and 60: Seminar 6: Wednesday 8 February 197
- Page 61 and 62: its relationship to the body that w
- Page 63 and 64: that in the position B1, would be t
- Page 65 and 66: is in the position of maintaining t
- Page 67 and 68: Effectively the problem of primary
- Page 69 and 70: which I will return later, what is
- Page 71 and 72: the object of desire is not unknown
- Page 73 and 74: that he tells the truth. You see th
- Page 75 and 76: look of the Real, there is not, for
- Page 77 and 78: accentuated by him is the search fo
- Page 79 and 80: What is happening, is it not, the d
- Page 81: grounded and articulatable way, and
- Page 84 and 85: eason is said to be purloined, whil
- Page 86 and 87: Borromean knot with that of the Ima
- Page 88 and 89: Alain Didier Weill, for his part, i
- Page 90 and 91: Seminar 8: Wednesday 8 March 1977Wh
- Page 92 and 93: shouldn’t tell you, at 7.15 at Ju
- Page 94 and 95: means that the tongue fails, that,
- Page 96 and 97: of his time as a formidable cleric
- Page 98 and 99: It is very difficult not to waver o
- Page 100 and 101: I remind you that the place of semb
- Page 102 and 103: this term in the feminine, since th
- Page 104 and 105:
which coincides with my experience,
- Page 106 and 107:
and to put that for you in black an
- Page 108 and 109:
see, does not see too great an inco
- Page 110 and 111:
that exists, he says what he believ
- Page 112 and 113:
In short, one must all the same rai
- Page 114 and 115:
particular besides, neurotic, a sex
- Page 116 and 117:
functioning as something else. And
- Page 118 and 119:
mean to deny? What can one deny? Th
- Page 120 and 121:
slipping from word to word, and thi
- Page 122 and 123:
Seminar 12: 17 May 1977People in th
- Page 124 and 125:
y writing. And writing only produce
- Page 126 and 127:
not pinpointed it? He calls this a