10.07.2015 Views

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It is flattened out, and <strong>in</strong> a way that you know, because I repeated, resifted it, youknow the value of the function, namely, that the effect this has is that if one ofthe 3 dissolves, the 2 others are freed. This is what I described, at one time, bythe term knot for someth<strong>in</strong>g that is not a knot, but effectively a cha<strong>in</strong>. This cha<strong>in</strong>all the same, it is strik<strong>in</strong>g that it can be flattened out.And I would say that – it is a reflection, like that, which was <strong>in</strong>spired <strong>in</strong> me by thefact that as regards the Real, people want to identify it to matter (la matière) – Iwould rather propose to write it like this ‘l’âme à tiers’ 7 (third party soul?). Itwould be, like that, a more serious way of referr<strong>in</strong>g oneself to this someth<strong>in</strong>g thatwe have to deal with, and it is not for noth<strong>in</strong>g that it is homogenous to the twoothers; that someone named Charles - Sanders as he was called, as you know, Ialready wrote this name often, many, many times, - that this Peirce was reallystruck by the fact that language does not properly speak<strong>in</strong>g express relation, that<strong>in</strong>deed is someth<strong>in</strong>g which is strik<strong>in</strong>g; that language does not permit a notationlike x hav<strong>in</strong>g a certa<strong>in</strong> type of relation with y, and no other; this <strong>in</strong>deed is whatauthorises me, s<strong>in</strong>ce Peirce himself articulates that for this there would need tobe a ternary logic, and not the one we use, a b<strong>in</strong>ary logic, this <strong>in</strong>deed is whatauthorises me to speak about l’âme à tiers’ as someth<strong>in</strong>g which necessitates acerta<strong>in</strong> type of logical relationships.Yes. Well then, all the same, I am go<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> effect to come to this Philosophie eneffet, a collection published by Aubier-Flammarion, to say what scared me a little7 Pun on la matière.45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!