10.07.2015 Views

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

that the little o-object is not uniquely, as one so often hears it said,essentially characterised by the fact that it is the miss<strong>in</strong>g object, it iscerta<strong>in</strong>ly the miss<strong>in</strong>g object, but its function of be<strong>in</strong>g the miss<strong>in</strong>g object isspecified very particularly, let us say, <strong>in</strong> the phenomenon of anxiety butbesides this function, one could say that its fundamental function is muchmore rather to fill <strong>in</strong> this radical gap which renders so imperious thenecessity of demand. If there is really someth<strong>in</strong>g lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this speak<strong>in</strong>gbe<strong>in</strong>g, it is not the little o-object, it is this gap <strong>in</strong> the Other which isarticulated with the S of Ø. That is why at the end of this <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>ctual circuit,to account for the experience of the listener, I am putt<strong>in</strong>g forward the ideathe nature of the enjoyment to which one can accede at the end of thejourney is not at all on the side of a ‘surplus enjoy<strong>in</strong>g’, but precisely on theside of this experience of this enjoyment, that perhaps one might call‘ecstatic’, enjoyment of existence itself – moreover as regards the term‘ecstatic enjoyment’ I was struck at f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Levi-Strauss writ<strong>in</strong>g on the onehand, <strong>in</strong> a number of Musique en jeu where Levi-Strauss puts very precisely<strong>in</strong> perspective the nature, not of the enjoyment, <strong>in</strong> fact the experience ofmusic and that which appears to him to be that of mystical experience.Freud himself, <strong>in</strong> a letter to Roma<strong>in</strong> Rolland, f<strong>in</strong>ds himself answer<strong>in</strong>g,spontaneously articulat<strong>in</strong>g that he refused himself musical enjoyment andthat this musical enjoyment appeared to him as strange as what Roma<strong>in</strong>Rolland was say<strong>in</strong>g to him about enjoyments of a mystical order; anyway itis he himself who articulated the two, who had the idea of <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g music<strong>in</strong>to it.<strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong> moment then, where the subject will make the leap, I don’t knowwhether one can say ‘beyond’ or ‘beh<strong>in</strong>d’ the little o-object, but willmanage to break through and arrive at this locus, one might say of thecommemoration of the unconscious be<strong>in</strong>g as such, namely, the jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g up ofthe most radical lacks which are those which constitute the gap of thesubject of the unconscious and that of the unconscious, namely, to put theexperience of this..., one might say that <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al moment, if you wish,one might say that the real as impossible is a white heat, is raised to<strong>in</strong>candescence; at that very moment, I mean, I would <strong>in</strong>dicate, for my part,39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!