10.07.2015 Views

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>in</strong>spired by it and its <strong>in</strong>spiration, the music bears witness to it. Good, this isthe start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t of what is to be noted.The other po<strong>in</strong>t is to consider that qua Other, I do not know what this lackwhich dwells <strong>in</strong> me is, but that the subject itself tells me noth<strong>in</strong>g about thislack s<strong>in</strong>ce this lack does not mean anyth<strong>in</strong>g directly. The subject itself ofthis lack knows noth<strong>in</strong>g and says noth<strong>in</strong>g about it because he is said by thislack, but qua Other I would say that I am <strong>in</strong> a topological perspective wherethere appears to me the po<strong>in</strong>t where the subject is divided s<strong>in</strong>ce he is said bythis lack, namely, that this lack which dwells <strong>in</strong> me, I discover that it is itsvery own, it itself knows noth<strong>in</strong>g about what it is say<strong>in</strong>g, but I know that itknows without know<strong>in</strong>g it. I am go<strong>in</strong>g therefore...You see that what I havesaid to you there could be written a little bit like what <strong>Lacan</strong> articulatesabout the process of separation. I am therefore go<strong>in</strong>g to articulate thedifferent moments of the drive with the different articulations of separation.Good.On the bottom left, I put the process of separation with an arrow which goesfrom the Ø (O with this lack put together between the capital O and thesubject, the little o-object, and this arrow is meant to signify that, I knownoth<strong>in</strong>g about this lack qua Other, but someth<strong>in</strong>g of it comes back to mefrom the subject who for its part says someth<strong>in</strong>g about it. That is why Iarticulate it with a drive, because it is just as if I wanted to manage toarticulate this lack, this noth<strong>in</strong>g, hang someth<strong>in</strong>g on it, know someth<strong>in</strong>gabout it, let us say I trust the subject: I allow myself to be pushed by it – itis moreover the drive. I allow myself to be pushed by it and I expect that itwill give me this little o-object. But accord<strong>in</strong>g as I advance, as I wait forthis subject, as I might say, what I discover is that <strong>in</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g the subject,the little o, all the two of us are do<strong>in</strong>g is go<strong>in</strong>g around it. It is effectively<strong>in</strong>side the loop and I assure myself that effectively this little o isunatta<strong>in</strong>able.I could say here that this is a first circuit and that, I have assured myself quaOther that he has effectively this character of lost objects, the idea that I33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!