Does that mean that here it is the same th<strong>in</strong>g, I mean that from the samepo<strong>in</strong>t of view one can put what is below above and <strong>in</strong>versely? This <strong>in</strong>deedis <strong>in</strong> effect what the double Moebius strip realises. I apologise foradventur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to someth<strong>in</strong>g which was not without some trouble for me, butit is certa<strong>in</strong> that that is the way it is. If you work at produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the sameway as I presented this double Moebius strip to you, namely, by fold<strong>in</strong>g twopages, two pages thus cut out <strong>in</strong> such a way that the one is go<strong>in</strong>g to beconjo<strong>in</strong>ed to the second page and that <strong>in</strong>versely the second page is go<strong>in</strong>g tobe conjo<strong>in</strong>ed to page 1, you will have exactly this result, this result aboutwhich you can note that one can make pass <strong>in</strong>differently the one as I mightsay <strong>in</strong> front of the other, page 1 <strong>in</strong> front of page 2, and <strong>in</strong>versely page 2 <strong>in</strong>front of page 1.What is the suspension which results from this highlight<strong>in</strong>g, thishighlight<strong>in</strong>g of the fact that <strong>in</strong> the double Moebius strip what is <strong>in</strong> frontfrom the same po<strong>in</strong>t of view can pass beh<strong>in</strong>d from the po<strong>in</strong>t of view whichrema<strong>in</strong>s the same. This leads us to someth<strong>in</strong>g which, I am encourag<strong>in</strong>g youto it, is of the order of know-how, a know-how which is demonstrative <strong>in</strong>this sense that it does not happen without the possibility of an une-bévue.For this possibility to be ext<strong>in</strong>guished, it has to cease to be written, namely,that we should f<strong>in</strong>d a way, and <strong>in</strong> this case a dom<strong>in</strong>ant way, a way ofdist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g the two cases.What is the way of dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g these two cases?This <strong>in</strong>terests us because the une-bévue is someth<strong>in</strong>g which substitutes forwhat is founded as knowledge that one knows, the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of knowledgethat one knows without know<strong>in</strong>g it (sans le savoir). The ‘le’ here is broughtto bear on someth<strong>in</strong>g, the ‘le’ is a pronoun on this particular occasion whichrefers to knowledge itself qua, not as knowledge, but what to do aboutknow<strong>in</strong>g. This <strong>in</strong>deed is why the unconscious lends itself to what I thoughtI should suspend under the title of the une-bévue.28
The <strong>in</strong>side and the outside <strong>in</strong> this particular case, namely, as regards thetorus, are they notions of structure or of form? Everyth<strong>in</strong>g depends on theconception that one has of space and I would say up to a certa<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t ofwhat we highlight as the truth of space. There is certa<strong>in</strong>ly a truth of spacewhich is that of the body. In this case, the body is someth<strong>in</strong>g which canonly be founded on the truth of space, which <strong>in</strong>deed is where the sort ofasymmetry that I highlight has its foundations. This asymmetry depends onthe fact that I designated as the same po<strong>in</strong>t of view. And this <strong>in</strong>deed is whywhat I wanted to <strong>in</strong>troduce this year is someth<strong>in</strong>g which is important for me.There is the same asymmetry not simply concern<strong>in</strong>g the body, butconcern<strong>in</strong>g what I designated <strong>in</strong> terms of the Symbolic. There is anasymmetry of the signifier and of the signified which rema<strong>in</strong>s enigmatic.The question that I would like to advance this year is exactly the follow<strong>in</strong>g:is the asymmetry of the signifier and of the signified of the same nature asthat of the conta<strong>in</strong>er and the conta<strong>in</strong>ed which is all the same someth<strong>in</strong>gwhich has its function for the body?29
- Page 1: Seminar 1: Wednesday 16 November 19
- Page 5 and 6: after all noticed that to consist m
- Page 7 and 8: It would be enough for you to take
- Page 9 and 10: There had therefore been a turning
- Page 11: Supposing that we have a torus in a
- Page 15 and 16: topology encourages us to do so. Th
- Page 17 and 18: and me, and I who, in short, by din
- Page 19 and 20: we cut it in two, the front and the
- Page 21 and 22: is itself a hole and in a certain w
- Page 23 and 24: Everyone knows that this is how thi
- Page 25 and 26: Seminar 3: Wednesday 21 December 19
- Page 27: proceed to this double cut, a doubl
- Page 31 and 32: egards the structure of the body, o
- Page 33 and 34: inspired by it and its inspiration,
- Page 35 and 36: music on you, is that it has this p
- Page 37 and 38: from the beloved to the lover. What
- Page 39 and 40: that the little o-object is not uni
- Page 41 and 42: Seminar 4: Wednesday 11 January 197
- Page 43 and 44: short I called the discourses; the
- Page 45 and 46: It is flattened out, and in a way t
- Page 47 and 48: astonishes me still more, is not th
- Page 49 and 50: Seminar 5: Wednesday 18 January 197
- Page 51 and 52: see it here, namely, something that
- Page 53 and 54: namely, that everything that concer
- Page 55 and 56: Let’s see. Let us try to see here
- Page 57 and 58: - X: You can’t hear me because pr
- Page 59 and 60: Seminar 6: Wednesday 8 February 197
- Page 61 and 62: its relationship to the body that w
- Page 63 and 64: that in the position B1, would be t
- Page 65 and 66: is in the position of maintaining t
- Page 67 and 68: Effectively the problem of primary
- Page 69 and 70: which I will return later, what is
- Page 71 and 72: the object of desire is not unknown
- Page 73 and 74: that he tells the truth. You see th
- Page 75 and 76: look of the Real, there is not, for
- Page 77 and 78: accentuated by him is the search fo
- Page 79 and 80:
What is happening, is it not, the d
- Page 81:
grounded and articulatable way, and
- Page 84 and 85:
eason is said to be purloined, whil
- Page 86 and 87:
Borromean knot with that of the Ima
- Page 88 and 89:
Alain Didier Weill, for his part, i
- Page 90 and 91:
Seminar 8: Wednesday 8 March 1977Wh
- Page 92 and 93:
shouldn’t tell you, at 7.15 at Ju
- Page 94 and 95:
means that the tongue fails, that,
- Page 96 and 97:
of his time as a formidable cleric
- Page 98 and 99:
It is very difficult not to waver o
- Page 100 and 101:
I remind you that the place of semb
- Page 102 and 103:
this term in the feminine, since th
- Page 104 and 105:
which coincides with my experience,
- Page 106 and 107:
and to put that for you in black an
- Page 108 and 109:
see, does not see too great an inco
- Page 110 and 111:
that exists, he says what he believ
- Page 112 and 113:
In short, one must all the same rai
- Page 114 and 115:
particular besides, neurotic, a sex
- Page 116 and 117:
functioning as something else. And
- Page 118 and 119:
mean to deny? What can one deny? Th
- Page 120 and 121:
slipping from word to word, and thi
- Page 122 and 123:
Seminar 12: 17 May 1977People in th
- Page 124 and 125:
y writing. And writing only produce
- Page 126 and 127:
not pinpointed it? He calls this a