made by chance, not that Freud did not work desperately hard at it, but hedid not say the last word on it. He specifically never enunciated thefollow<strong>in</strong>g, which is that the world is toric. He believed, as every notion ofthe psyche implies, that there was someth<strong>in</strong>g that I earlier dismissed bysay<strong>in</strong>g a loop, and another loop around the first, this one be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> themiddle, he believed that there was a vigilance, a vigilance that he called thepsyche, a vigilance which reflected the cosmos po<strong>in</strong>t by po<strong>in</strong>t. In this hewas aware of what is considered as a common truth, which is that thepsyche is the reflection of a certa<strong>in</strong> world.That I am enunciat<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong> terms, I repeat, of someth<strong>in</strong>g tentative, becauseI do not see why I would be any more sure about what I am putt<strong>in</strong>g forward,even though there are many elements which give the feel<strong>in</strong>g of it, andspecifically from the outset what I put forward about the structure of thebody, of the body considered as what I called a rod.That the liv<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g, every liv<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g, is denom<strong>in</strong>ated as rod, issometh<strong>in</strong>g that a certa<strong>in</strong> number of studies, moreover crudely anatomical,have always seen themselves confirm. That the torus should be someth<strong>in</strong>gwhich is presented as hav<strong>in</strong>g two holes around which someth<strong>in</strong>g consists, issometh<strong>in</strong>g that is simply obvious. I repeat, it was not necessary to constructa lot of specifically microscopic apparatuses, it is someth<strong>in</strong>g that has alwaysbeen known, s<strong>in</strong>ce simply people began to dissect, began to do the mostmacroscopic anatomy.That one can cut the torus <strong>in</strong> such a way that it becomes a double turnMoebius strip is certa<strong>in</strong>ly to be noted. In a certa<strong>in</strong> way, the torus <strong>in</strong> question20
is itself a hole and <strong>in</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> way represents the body. But that this shouldbe confirmed by the fact that this Moebius strip which I already chose toexpress the fact that the conjunction of a front and a back is someth<strong>in</strong>gwhich symbolises rather well the union of the unconscious and theconscious, is someth<strong>in</strong>g which is worthwhile remember<strong>in</strong>g.Can we consider a sphere as a hole <strong>in</strong> space? This is obviously verysuspect. It is very suspect because this pre-supposes, it pre-supposessometh<strong>in</strong>g that is not self-evident, the plung<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to space. It is equally truefor the torus, and that is why it is by divid<strong>in</strong>g the torus <strong>in</strong>to two sheets, if Ican express myself <strong>in</strong> that way, <strong>in</strong>to two sheets capable of mak<strong>in</strong>g a doubleturn, that we rediscover the surface, namely, someth<strong>in</strong>g that to our eyes ismore assured, is more assured <strong>in</strong> any case to found what is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> ahole.It is clear that it is not today or yesterday that I made use of theseconcatenations. Already to symbolise the circuit, the cutt<strong>in</strong>g of desire anddemand, I made use of this, namely, of the torus. I had dist<strong>in</strong>guished twomodes of it, namely, what went around the torus, and on the other hand whatwent around the central hole. In this respect the identification of thedemand to what is presented like this, and of desire to what is presented likethat, was altogether significant.There is someth<strong>in</strong>g that I po<strong>in</strong>ted out the last time, namely, this, whichconsists <strong>in</strong> a torus, with<strong>in</strong> a torus. If you mark these two tori, the two of21
- Page 1: Seminar 1: Wednesday 16 November 19
- Page 5 and 6: after all noticed that to consist m
- Page 7 and 8: It would be enough for you to take
- Page 9 and 10: There had therefore been a turning
- Page 11: Supposing that we have a torus in a
- Page 15 and 16: topology encourages us to do so. Th
- Page 17 and 18: and me, and I who, in short, by din
- Page 19: we cut it in two, the front and the
- Page 23 and 24: Everyone knows that this is how thi
- Page 25 and 26: Seminar 3: Wednesday 21 December 19
- Page 27 and 28: proceed to this double cut, a doubl
- Page 29 and 30: The inside and the outside in this
- Page 31 and 32: egards the structure of the body, o
- Page 33 and 34: inspired by it and its inspiration,
- Page 35 and 36: music on you, is that it has this p
- Page 37 and 38: from the beloved to the lover. What
- Page 39 and 40: that the little o-object is not uni
- Page 41 and 42: Seminar 4: Wednesday 11 January 197
- Page 43 and 44: short I called the discourses; the
- Page 45 and 46: It is flattened out, and in a way t
- Page 47 and 48: astonishes me still more, is not th
- Page 49 and 50: Seminar 5: Wednesday 18 January 197
- Page 51 and 52: see it here, namely, something that
- Page 53 and 54: namely, that everything that concer
- Page 55 and 56: Let’s see. Let us try to see here
- Page 57 and 58: - X: You can’t hear me because pr
- Page 59 and 60: Seminar 6: Wednesday 8 February 197
- Page 61 and 62: its relationship to the body that w
- Page 63 and 64: that in the position B1, would be t
- Page 65 and 66: is in the position of maintaining t
- Page 67 and 68: Effectively the problem of primary
- Page 69 and 70: which I will return later, what is
- Page 71 and 72:
the object of desire is not unknown
- Page 73 and 74:
that he tells the truth. You see th
- Page 75 and 76:
look of the Real, there is not, for
- Page 77 and 78:
accentuated by him is the search fo
- Page 79 and 80:
What is happening, is it not, the d
- Page 81:
grounded and articulatable way, and
- Page 84 and 85:
eason is said to be purloined, whil
- Page 86 and 87:
Borromean knot with that of the Ima
- Page 88 and 89:
Alain Didier Weill, for his part, i
- Page 90 and 91:
Seminar 8: Wednesday 8 March 1977Wh
- Page 92 and 93:
shouldn’t tell you, at 7.15 at Ju
- Page 94 and 95:
means that the tongue fails, that,
- Page 96 and 97:
of his time as a formidable cleric
- Page 98 and 99:
It is very difficult not to waver o
- Page 100 and 101:
I remind you that the place of semb
- Page 102 and 103:
this term in the feminine, since th
- Page 104 and 105:
which coincides with my experience,
- Page 106 and 107:
and to put that for you in black an
- Page 108 and 109:
see, does not see too great an inco
- Page 110 and 111:
that exists, he says what he believ
- Page 112 and 113:
In short, one must all the same rai
- Page 114 and 115:
particular besides, neurotic, a sex
- Page 116 and 117:
functioning as something else. And
- Page 118 and 119:
mean to deny? What can one deny? Th
- Page 120 and 121:
slipping from word to word, and thi
- Page 122 and 123:
Seminar 12: 17 May 1977People in th
- Page 124 and 125:
y writing. And writing only produce
- Page 126 and 127:
not pinpointed it? He calls this a