unconscious cha<strong>in</strong> stops at k<strong>in</strong>ship relationships is yes or no founded,relationship of the child to his k<strong>in</strong>.If I pose the question: ‘What is a hole?’, you have to trust me, this has acerta<strong>in</strong> relationship to the question. A hole like that, of feel<strong>in</strong>g, that is whatthis means when I crack the surface. By this I mean that by <strong>in</strong>tuition, ourhole is a hole <strong>in</strong> the surface. But a surface has a front and a back, as is wellknown, and that signifies therefore that a hole, is the hole <strong>in</strong> the front, plusthe hole <strong>in</strong> the back. But s<strong>in</strong>ce there exists a Moebius strip, which has theproperty of conjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the front which is here with the back which is there,is the Moebius strip a hole?It is obvious that it really seems to be so. Here there is a hole, but is it a truehole?It is not at all clear, for a s<strong>in</strong>gle reason, as I already po<strong>in</strong>ted out, that aMoebius strip is noth<strong>in</strong>g other than a cut, and that it is easy to see that, ifthis is def<strong>in</strong>ed as a front, it is a cut between a front and a back. Because it isenough for you to consider this figure, it is quite easy to see that if here isthe front, a back is there, s<strong>in</strong>ce it is the back of this front and that, here, thecut is between a front and a back, thanks to which, <strong>in</strong> the Moebius strip, if18
we cut it <strong>in</strong> two, the front and the back as I might say become normal aga<strong>in</strong>namely, that when a Moebius strip cut <strong>in</strong> two, we are go<strong>in</strong>g to go over it, itis easy to imag<strong>in</strong>e what is found, namely, that from the moment that thereare two turns, there will be a front dist<strong>in</strong>ct from the back.This <strong>in</strong>deed is why a Moebius strip is essentially capable of redoubl<strong>in</strong>gitself; and what must be remarked, is the fact that it redoubles itself <strong>in</strong> thefollow<strong>in</strong>g way which allows the passage. It is a real pity that I did not takeprecautions. Here is the Moebius strip as it redoubles itself, as it redoublesitself and shows itself to be compatible with a torus. This <strong>in</strong>deed is why Iam attached to consider<strong>in</strong>g the torus as be<strong>in</strong>g capable of be<strong>in</strong>g cut out <strong>in</strong>terms of a Moebius strip. And it is enough, it is enough for this – here is thetorus – it is enough for there to be cut out <strong>in</strong> it not a Moebius strip, but adouble Moebius strip. It is very precisely what is go<strong>in</strong>g to give us an imageof what is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>k between the conscious and the unconscious.The conscious and the unconscious communicate and are both supported bya toric world this is the reason, this is the discovery, a discovery which was19
- Page 1: Seminar 1: Wednesday 16 November 19
- Page 5 and 6: after all noticed that to consist m
- Page 7 and 8: It would be enough for you to take
- Page 9 and 10: There had therefore been a turning
- Page 11: Supposing that we have a torus in a
- Page 15 and 16: topology encourages us to do so. Th
- Page 17: and me, and I who, in short, by din
- Page 21 and 22: is itself a hole and in a certain w
- Page 23 and 24: Everyone knows that this is how thi
- Page 25 and 26: Seminar 3: Wednesday 21 December 19
- Page 27 and 28: proceed to this double cut, a doubl
- Page 29 and 30: The inside and the outside in this
- Page 31 and 32: egards the structure of the body, o
- Page 33 and 34: inspired by it and its inspiration,
- Page 35 and 36: music on you, is that it has this p
- Page 37 and 38: from the beloved to the lover. What
- Page 39 and 40: that the little o-object is not uni
- Page 41 and 42: Seminar 4: Wednesday 11 January 197
- Page 43 and 44: short I called the discourses; the
- Page 45 and 46: It is flattened out, and in a way t
- Page 47 and 48: astonishes me still more, is not th
- Page 49 and 50: Seminar 5: Wednesday 18 January 197
- Page 51 and 52: see it here, namely, something that
- Page 53 and 54: namely, that everything that concer
- Page 55 and 56: Let’s see. Let us try to see here
- Page 57 and 58: - X: You can’t hear me because pr
- Page 59 and 60: Seminar 6: Wednesday 8 February 197
- Page 61 and 62: its relationship to the body that w
- Page 63 and 64: that in the position B1, would be t
- Page 65 and 66: is in the position of maintaining t
- Page 67 and 68: Effectively the problem of primary
- Page 69 and 70:
which I will return later, what is
- Page 71 and 72:
the object of desire is not unknown
- Page 73 and 74:
that he tells the truth. You see th
- Page 75 and 76:
look of the Real, there is not, for
- Page 77 and 78:
accentuated by him is the search fo
- Page 79 and 80:
What is happening, is it not, the d
- Page 81:
grounded and articulatable way, and
- Page 84 and 85:
eason is said to be purloined, whil
- Page 86 and 87:
Borromean knot with that of the Ima
- Page 88 and 89:
Alain Didier Weill, for his part, i
- Page 90 and 91:
Seminar 8: Wednesday 8 March 1977Wh
- Page 92 and 93:
shouldn’t tell you, at 7.15 at Ju
- Page 94 and 95:
means that the tongue fails, that,
- Page 96 and 97:
of his time as a formidable cleric
- Page 98 and 99:
It is very difficult not to waver o
- Page 100 and 101:
I remind you that the place of semb
- Page 102 and 103:
this term in the feminine, since th
- Page 104 and 105:
which coincides with my experience,
- Page 106 and 107:
and to put that for you in black an
- Page 108 and 109:
see, does not see too great an inco
- Page 110 and 111:
that exists, he says what he believ
- Page 112 and 113:
In short, one must all the same rai
- Page 114 and 115:
particular besides, neurotic, a sex
- Page 116 and 117:
functioning as something else. And
- Page 118 and 119:
mean to deny? What can one deny? Th
- Page 120 and 121:
slipping from word to word, and thi
- Page 122 and 123:
Seminar 12: 17 May 1977People in th
- Page 124 and 125:
y writing. And writing only produce
- Page 126 and 127:
not pinpointed it? He calls this a