unconscious to make her consist, it is the radically other. She even is notexcept qua other. Well then, that’s the case for me. I also, I only have anunconscious. That is even why I th<strong>in</strong>k about it all the time. It has got to thepo<strong>in</strong>t that – I can bear witness to you of it – it has got to the po<strong>in</strong>t that Ith<strong>in</strong>k the universe toric and that it means noth<strong>in</strong>g else, the fact is that I onlyconsist <strong>in</strong> an unconscious of which, of course, I th<strong>in</strong>k night and day, whichmeans that the une-bévue becomes <strong>in</strong>exact. I make so few blunders that it isthe same th<strong>in</strong>g – naturally I make some from time to time, that is of littleimportance; I may happen to say <strong>in</strong> a restaurant ‘Mademoiselle is reduced toeat<strong>in</strong>g only shrimps à la nage’ [Mademoiselle en est réduit 6 a ne mangerque des écrevisses à la nage’], as long as that is where we are at, mak<strong>in</strong>g anerror of this k<strong>in</strong>d, does not matter. When all is said and done, I am a perfecthysteric, namely, symptomless except from time to time this error of genderof the k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> question.There is all the same, I would say, someth<strong>in</strong>g that dist<strong>in</strong>guishes the hystericfrom me on this particular occasion. But I am go<strong>in</strong>g to try to present it toyou. You can see how clumsy I am. There you are. That is two – I amcolour<strong>in</strong>g this one here to give the direction – that means a torus that l<strong>in</strong>ksup with another one. Everyone knows, because I already <strong>in</strong>dicated it the lasttime, that if you make a cut here and if you fold the torus you will obta<strong>in</strong> thefollow<strong>in</strong>g: someth<strong>in</strong>g which is presented like that, namely, whichreproduces what I called earlier the rod, except for the fact that what I drewearlier like that is there <strong>in</strong>side the rod. The difference between the hysteric6 Instead of the fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e ‘réduite’16
and me, and I who, <strong>in</strong> short, by d<strong>in</strong>t of hav<strong>in</strong>g an unconscious unity with myunconscious, the difference is this, it is that, <strong>in</strong> short, a hysteric is susta<strong>in</strong>ed<strong>in</strong> her form as rod, is susta<strong>in</strong>ed by a framework. This framework is <strong>in</strong> shortdist<strong>in</strong>ct from her consciousness. This framework is her love for her father.All that we know about the cases enunciated by Freud concern<strong>in</strong>g thehysteric, whether it is Anna O., Emmy von N., or any other of them, theother von R., for example, the sett<strong>in</strong>g, is someth<strong>in</strong>g that I designated earlieras a cha<strong>in</strong>, a cha<strong>in</strong> of generations.It is quite clear that from the moment that one is engaged along this path,there is no reason why it should stop, namely, that here there can besometh<strong>in</strong>g else that constitutes a cha<strong>in</strong> and that it is a question of see<strong>in</strong>g –this cannot go very far – of see<strong>in</strong>g how this on occasion will constitute a rodwith respect to love, the love of the father <strong>in</strong> question.That does not mean that it is settled and that one can here schematise theturn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>side out of this torus around torus 2, let us call it that, that one canschematise it by a rod. There is perhaps someth<strong>in</strong>g which creates anobstacle, and very specifically that’s what it’s all about; the fact that the17
- Page 1: Seminar 1: Wednesday 16 November 19
- Page 5 and 6: after all noticed that to consist m
- Page 7 and 8: It would be enough for you to take
- Page 9 and 10: There had therefore been a turning
- Page 11: Supposing that we have a torus in a
- Page 15: topology encourages us to do so. Th
- Page 19 and 20: we cut it in two, the front and the
- Page 21 and 22: is itself a hole and in a certain w
- Page 23 and 24: Everyone knows that this is how thi
- Page 25 and 26: Seminar 3: Wednesday 21 December 19
- Page 27 and 28: proceed to this double cut, a doubl
- Page 29 and 30: The inside and the outside in this
- Page 31 and 32: egards the structure of the body, o
- Page 33 and 34: inspired by it and its inspiration,
- Page 35 and 36: music on you, is that it has this p
- Page 37 and 38: from the beloved to the lover. What
- Page 39 and 40: that the little o-object is not uni
- Page 41 and 42: Seminar 4: Wednesday 11 January 197
- Page 43 and 44: short I called the discourses; the
- Page 45 and 46: It is flattened out, and in a way t
- Page 47 and 48: astonishes me still more, is not th
- Page 49 and 50: Seminar 5: Wednesday 18 January 197
- Page 51 and 52: see it here, namely, something that
- Page 53 and 54: namely, that everything that concer
- Page 55 and 56: Let’s see. Let us try to see here
- Page 57 and 58: - X: You can’t hear me because pr
- Page 59 and 60: Seminar 6: Wednesday 8 February 197
- Page 61 and 62: its relationship to the body that w
- Page 63 and 64: that in the position B1, would be t
- Page 65 and 66: is in the position of maintaining t
- Page 67 and 68:
Effectively the problem of primary
- Page 69 and 70:
which I will return later, what is
- Page 71 and 72:
the object of desire is not unknown
- Page 73 and 74:
that he tells the truth. You see th
- Page 75 and 76:
look of the Real, there is not, for
- Page 77 and 78:
accentuated by him is the search fo
- Page 79 and 80:
What is happening, is it not, the d
- Page 81:
grounded and articulatable way, and
- Page 84 and 85:
eason is said to be purloined, whil
- Page 86 and 87:
Borromean knot with that of the Ima
- Page 88 and 89:
Alain Didier Weill, for his part, i
- Page 90 and 91:
Seminar 8: Wednesday 8 March 1977Wh
- Page 92 and 93:
shouldn’t tell you, at 7.15 at Ju
- Page 94 and 95:
means that the tongue fails, that,
- Page 96 and 97:
of his time as a formidable cleric
- Page 98 and 99:
It is very difficult not to waver o
- Page 100 and 101:
I remind you that the place of semb
- Page 102 and 103:
this term in the feminine, since th
- Page 104 and 105:
which coincides with my experience,
- Page 106 and 107:
and to put that for you in black an
- Page 108 and 109:
see, does not see too great an inco
- Page 110 and 111:
that exists, he says what he believ
- Page 112 and 113:
In short, one must all the same rai
- Page 114 and 115:
particular besides, neurotic, a sex
- Page 116 and 117:
functioning as something else. And
- Page 118 and 119:
mean to deny? What can one deny? Th
- Page 120 and 121:
slipping from word to word, and thi
- Page 122 and 123:
Seminar 12: 17 May 1977People in th
- Page 124 and 125:
y writing. And writing only produce
- Page 126 and 127:
not pinpointed it? He calls this a