Man th<strong>in</strong>ks. That does not mean that he is made only for that. But what ismanifest, is that this is the only valid th<strong>in</strong>g he does, because valid means –and noth<strong>in</strong>g else, it is not a scale of values, a scale of values, as I rem<strong>in</strong>dyou, turns round <strong>in</strong> circles – valid means noth<strong>in</strong>g other than the fact that it<strong>in</strong>volves the submission of use value to exchange value. What is patent, isthat the notion of value is <strong>in</strong>herent to this system of the torus and the notionof someth<strong>in</strong>g of an une-bévue <strong>in</strong> my title of this year only means that – onecould just as well say the contrary – man knows more than he believes heknows. But the substance of this knowledge, the materiality which isbeneath, is noth<strong>in</strong>g other than the signifier <strong>in</strong> so far as it has mean<strong>in</strong>geffects.Man parle-être 4 as I said which means noth<strong>in</strong>g other than that hespeaks signifier, with which the notion of be<strong>in</strong>g is confused.This is real. Real or true? Everyth<strong>in</strong>g is posed, at this tentative level, as ifthe two words were synonyms. The appall<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>g is that they are noteverywhere so. The true is what one believes to be such; faith and evenreligious faith, is the true that has noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with the real.Psychoanalysis, it must be clearly said turns round <strong>in</strong> the same circle. It isthe modern form of faith, of religious faith. Adrift, that is where the true iswhen the real is what is at stake. All that because manifestly – s<strong>in</strong>ce thetime, we would have known it, if it were not manifest – manifestly there isno know<strong>in</strong>g (connaissance). There is only some k<strong>in</strong>d of knowledge (savoir)<strong>in</strong> the sense that I said at the outset, namely, that we make mistakes...abévue, that is what is at stake, philosophy go<strong>in</strong>g round <strong>in</strong> circles. It is amatter of substitut<strong>in</strong>g a different sense for the term world system that wemust <strong>in</strong>deed preserve, even though as regards this world we can say noth<strong>in</strong>gabout man, except that he has fallen from it. We are go<strong>in</strong>g to see how, andthat has a great deal of relationship with the central hole of the torus.There is no progress, because there cannot be any. Man goes round <strong>in</strong>circles if what I say about his structure is true, because the structure, thestructure of man is toric. Not at all that I affirm that it is so. I am say<strong>in</strong>gthat one can try to see the state of affairs, this all the more s<strong>in</strong>ce general4 Condens<strong>in</strong>g ‘speaks’ and ‘be<strong>in</strong>g’.14
topology encourages us to do so. The world system up to now has alwaysbeen spheroidal. Perhaps we might change! The world has always beenpa<strong>in</strong>ted, up to the present, like that, as regards what men have enunciated,has been pa<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong>side a bubble. The liv<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g considers himself as aball, but with time he all the same realised that he was not a ball, a bubble.Why not recognise that he is organised, I mean what one sees of the liv<strong>in</strong>gbody, that he is organised at what I called the other day a rod.There you are, I am try<strong>in</strong>g to draw it like that. It is obvious that this is howthere ends up what we know about the body as consistent. This is calledecto, that endo and then around, there is meso. That is how it is made; herethere is the mouth and here the contrary, the posterior mouth. Only this rodis noth<strong>in</strong>g other than a torus. The fact that we are toric goes rather well <strong>in</strong>short with what I called the other day, rod (trique). It is an elision of the o:t()rique.So then this leads us to consider that the hysteric whom everyone knows isjust as well male as female, the hystorique 5 if I may allow myself thisslippage, we must consider <strong>in</strong> short that she is – I am fem<strong>in</strong>is<strong>in</strong>g it on thisoccasion, but as you are go<strong>in</strong>g to see I am go<strong>in</strong>g to put my weight on theother side, that will largely suffice to demonstrate to you that I do not th<strong>in</strong>kthat there are only fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e hysterics – the hystorique <strong>in</strong> short has only an5 Condens<strong>in</strong>g ‘hysterique’ and ‘torique’15
- Page 1: Seminar 1: Wednesday 16 November 19
- Page 5 and 6: after all noticed that to consist m
- Page 7 and 8: It would be enough for you to take
- Page 9 and 10: There had therefore been a turning
- Page 11: Supposing that we have a torus in a
- Page 17 and 18: and me, and I who, in short, by din
- Page 19 and 20: we cut it in two, the front and the
- Page 21 and 22: is itself a hole and in a certain w
- Page 23 and 24: Everyone knows that this is how thi
- Page 25 and 26: Seminar 3: Wednesday 21 December 19
- Page 27 and 28: proceed to this double cut, a doubl
- Page 29 and 30: The inside and the outside in this
- Page 31 and 32: egards the structure of the body, o
- Page 33 and 34: inspired by it and its inspiration,
- Page 35 and 36: music on you, is that it has this p
- Page 37 and 38: from the beloved to the lover. What
- Page 39 and 40: that the little o-object is not uni
- Page 41 and 42: Seminar 4: Wednesday 11 January 197
- Page 43 and 44: short I called the discourses; the
- Page 45 and 46: It is flattened out, and in a way t
- Page 47 and 48: astonishes me still more, is not th
- Page 49 and 50: Seminar 5: Wednesday 18 January 197
- Page 51 and 52: see it here, namely, something that
- Page 53 and 54: namely, that everything that concer
- Page 55 and 56: Let’s see. Let us try to see here
- Page 57 and 58: - X: You can’t hear me because pr
- Page 59 and 60: Seminar 6: Wednesday 8 February 197
- Page 61 and 62: its relationship to the body that w
- Page 63 and 64:
that in the position B1, would be t
- Page 65 and 66:
is in the position of maintaining t
- Page 67 and 68:
Effectively the problem of primary
- Page 69 and 70:
which I will return later, what is
- Page 71 and 72:
the object of desire is not unknown
- Page 73 and 74:
that he tells the truth. You see th
- Page 75 and 76:
look of the Real, there is not, for
- Page 77 and 78:
accentuated by him is the search fo
- Page 79 and 80:
What is happening, is it not, the d
- Page 81:
grounded and articulatable way, and
- Page 84 and 85:
eason is said to be purloined, whil
- Page 86 and 87:
Borromean knot with that of the Ima
- Page 88 and 89:
Alain Didier Weill, for his part, i
- Page 90 and 91:
Seminar 8: Wednesday 8 March 1977Wh
- Page 92 and 93:
shouldn’t tell you, at 7.15 at Ju
- Page 94 and 95:
means that the tongue fails, that,
- Page 96 and 97:
of his time as a formidable cleric
- Page 98 and 99:
It is very difficult not to waver o
- Page 100 and 101:
I remind you that the place of semb
- Page 102 and 103:
this term in the feminine, since th
- Page 104 and 105:
which coincides with my experience,
- Page 106 and 107:
and to put that for you in black an
- Page 108 and 109:
see, does not see too great an inco
- Page 110 and 111:
that exists, he says what he believ
- Page 112 and 113:
In short, one must all the same rai
- Page 114 and 115:
particular besides, neurotic, a sex
- Page 116 and 117:
functioning as something else. And
- Page 118 and 119:
mean to deny? What can one deny? Th
- Page 120 and 121:
slipping from word to word, and thi
- Page 122 and 123:
Seminar 12: 17 May 1977People in th
- Page 124 and 125:
y writing. And writing only produce
- Page 126 and 127:
not pinpointed it? He calls this a