10.07.2015 Views

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

slipp<strong>in</strong>g from word to word, and this <strong>in</strong>deed is what is at stake when we use thewrong key to open a door which precisely this key does not open. Freud hastensto tell us that we thought that it opened this door but that we were mistaken.Bévue is <strong>in</strong>deed the only sense that rema<strong>in</strong>s for this consciousness. Consciousnesshas no other support than to permit a bévue. It is very disturb<strong>in</strong>g because thisconsciousness strongly resembles the Unconscious, s<strong>in</strong>ce it is what we say isresponsible, responsible for all the bévue’s that make us dream. Dream <strong>in</strong> thename of what? Of what I called the o-object, namely, that by which by thesubject, who, essentially, is divided, barred, namely, still more barred than theOther.This is what I am rack<strong>in</strong>g my bra<strong>in</strong>s about. I am rack<strong>in</strong>g my bra<strong>in</strong>s and I th<strong>in</strong>k thatwhen all is said and done psychoanalysis, is, is what seems true (fait vrai), but howmust one understand this seems true? It is an effort at sense, but it is a sensblance(sens blant). There is the whole distance that I designated between S 2 towhat it produces. It is of course the analyser who produces the analyst, there isno doubt about that. And that is why I question myself about what is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>this status of the analyst to whom I leave this place of seem<strong>in</strong>g true, ofsemblance, and of whom I consider, that it is moreover, there where you haveseen it formerly, there is noth<strong>in</strong>g easier than to slip <strong>in</strong>to the bévue, I mean <strong>in</strong>to aneffect of the Unconscious, s<strong>in</strong>ce it was <strong>in</strong>deed an effect of my unconscious, whichmeans that you were good enough to consider a slip, and not as what I wanted toqualify myself, namely, the next time as a crude error. [Bars and arrow]o > $S 2 S 1What effect does this subject, divided subject have if the S 1 , the signifier <strong>in</strong>dexed1, S <strong>in</strong>dex 1, is found <strong>in</strong> our tetrahedron, s<strong>in</strong>ce what I stressed, is that, <strong>in</strong> thistetrahedron, one of its l<strong>in</strong>ks is always broken, namely, that the S <strong>in</strong>dex 1 does notrepresent the subject for S <strong>in</strong>dex 2, namely, of the Other. The S <strong>in</strong>dex 1 and the S<strong>in</strong>dex 2, is very precisely what I designated by the divided O of which I made asignifier S(Ø).120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!