10.07.2015 Views

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

mean to deny? What can one deny? This plunges us <strong>in</strong>to the Verne<strong>in</strong>ung ofwhich Freud has put forward the essentials. What he enunciates, is that negationpresupposes a Bejahung. It is start<strong>in</strong>g from someth<strong>in</strong>g that is enunciated aspositive, that one writes negation. In other words, the sign is to be sought – andthis <strong>in</strong>deed is what, <strong>in</strong> this agency of the letter, that I posed – is to be sought ascongruence of the sign to the Real.What is a sign that one cannot write? For one really writes this sign. I highlightedlike that, at one time, the pert<strong>in</strong>ence of what the French lalangue touches on asadverb. Can one say that the Real lies (ment)? In analysis, one can surely say thatthe True lies. Analysis is a long journey (chem<strong>in</strong>ement) – one f<strong>in</strong>ds it everywhere– that the chem<strong>in</strong>e-ne-mente (the journey does not lie) it is someth<strong>in</strong>g which canonly on occasion signal to us that, as <strong>in</strong> the wire of the telephone, that we f<strong>in</strong>d ourfoot<strong>in</strong>g.And then, that such th<strong>in</strong>gs can be put forward poses the question of what issense. Is sense supposed to be only ly<strong>in</strong>g, s<strong>in</strong>ce one can say that the notion of theReal excludes – which should be written <strong>in</strong> the subjunctive – that it excludes(qu’elle exclue) sense? Does that <strong>in</strong>dicate that it also excludes the lie? This<strong>in</strong>deed is what we have to deal with, when we wager <strong>in</strong> short on the fact that theReal excludes – <strong>in</strong> the subjunctive, but the subjunctive is the <strong>in</strong>dication of themodal – what is modulated <strong>in</strong> this modal that would exclude (excluerait) the lie?In truth, - we sense it clearly -, there is noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> all of that but paradoxes.Are paradoxes representable? Doxa, is op<strong>in</strong>ion, the first th<strong>in</strong>g on which I<strong>in</strong>troduced a lecture, at the time of what one can call or that one could call mybeg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs, it is <strong>in</strong> the Meno <strong>in</strong> which it is enunciated that doxa, is true op<strong>in</strong>ion.There is not the slightest true op<strong>in</strong>ion, s<strong>in</strong>ce there are paradoxes. This is thequestion that I am rais<strong>in</strong>g, whether paradoxes are or are not representable, Imean depictable (dess<strong>in</strong>ables). The pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of true say<strong>in</strong>g, is negation, and mypractice, s<strong>in</strong>ce there is a practice, a practice about which I question myself, is that,that I slide, I have to slide, because that is the way it is constructed, between thetransference, that is called, I do not know why, negative, but it is a fact that it iscalled that. It is called negative because people clearly sense that there is118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!