Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

More documents

Recommendations

Info

But as compared to this first torus, as compared to the same, what you haveis something that I draw like that, with respect to the same, the torus-rod – ifwe remember this thing, the torus-rod comes here, namely, that in order tosupport things, the hole which is to be made in the torus, the one that Idesignated here, can be made in any locus whatsoever of the torus, up to andincluding cutting the torus here, because then it is quite manifest that thiscut torus can be turned inside out in the same way and that it will be byjoining two cuts that we will obtain this aspect. In other words by cuttingthe torus here, you get what I called the presentation as a rod in the sameway, namely, that something that will manifest itself in the torus by two cutswill allow a folding over exactly in the way as by joining the two cuts – andnot by forming the single cut, the one that I made here – it is in joining twocuts that we obtain this rod which I am calling by this term, even though it isa torus.Here you have what today, and I agree it is not easy to digest, but what Iwould like the next time, namely, on the 2 nd Tuesday of December what Iwould like to hear the next time from one of you, is the way in which thesetwo modes of folding of the torus being joined to a third which for its part isthe following:10
Supposing that we have a torus in another torus, the same operation isconceivable for the 2 tori, namely, that from a cut made in this one and froma different distinct cut, since it is not the same torus, made in that one. It isin this case quite clear – I will leave you to conceive it – at the folding backof these two tori will give us the same rod, except for the fact that in the rodthere will be an analogous content, except for the fact that for the two cases,this time, the inside will be outside and the same for this one; I mean for thetorus which is inside.How, I will ask you the question, how identify – because it is distinct – howidentify hysterical identification, the so-called loving identification to thefather and the identification that I would call neutral, the one which isneither one nor the other, which is the identification to a particular trait, to atrait that I called – that is how I translated the einziger Zug – that I calledany trait whatsoever?How divide up these three inversions of homogenous tori therefore in theirpractice, and what is more which maintain the symmetry, as I might say,between one torus and another, how divide them up, how designate in ahomologous fashion paternal identification, hysterical identification,identification to a trait which is simply the same? There is the question onwhich I would like, that you would be good enough to engage with the nexttime.11
Page 1: Seminar 1: Wednesday 16 November 19
Page 5 and 6: after all noticed that to consist m
Page 7 and 8: It would be enough for you to take
Page 9: There had therefore been a turning
Page 15 and 16: topology encourages us to do so. Th
Page 17 and 18: and me, and I who, in short, by din
Page 19 and 20: we cut it in two, the front and the
Page 21 and 22: is itself a hole and in a certain w
Page 23 and 24: Everyone knows that this is how thi
Page 25 and 26: Seminar 3: Wednesday 21 December 19
Page 27 and 28: proceed to this double cut, a doubl
Page 29 and 30: The inside and the outside in this
Page 31 and 32: egards the structure of the body, o
Page 33 and 34: inspired by it and its inspiration,
Page 35 and 36: music on you, is that it has this p
Page 37 and 38: from the beloved to the lover. What
Page 39 and 40: that the little o-object is not uni
Page 41 and 42: Seminar 4: Wednesday 11 January 197
Page 43 and 44: short I called the discourses; the
Page 45 and 46: It is flattened out, and in a way t
Page 47 and 48: astonishes me still more, is not th
Page 49 and 50: Seminar 5: Wednesday 18 January 197
Page 51 and 52: see it here, namely, something that
Page 53 and 54: namely, that everything that concer
Page 55 and 56: Let’s see. Let us try to see here
Page 57 and 58: - X: You can’t hear me because pr
Page 59 and 60: Seminar 6: Wednesday 8 February 197
Page 61 and 62:
its relationship to the body that w
Page 63 and 64:
that in the position B1, would be t
Page 65 and 66:
is in the position of maintaining t
Page 67 and 68:
Effectively the problem of primary
Page 69 and 70:
which I will return later, what is
Page 71 and 72:
the object of desire is not unknown
Page 73 and 74:
that he tells the truth. You see th
Page 75 and 76:
look of the Real, there is not, for
Page 77 and 78:
accentuated by him is the search fo
Page 79 and 80:
What is happening, is it not, the d
Page 81:
grounded and articulatable way, and
Page 84 and 85:
eason is said to be purloined, whil
Page 86 and 87:
Borromean knot with that of the Ima
Page 88 and 89:
Alain Didier Weill, for his part, i
Page 90 and 91:
Seminar 8: Wednesday 8 March 1977Wh
Page 92 and 93:
shouldn’t tell you, at 7.15 at Ju
Page 94 and 95:
means that the tongue fails, that,
Page 96 and 97:
of his time as a formidable cleric
Page 98 and 99:
It is very difficult not to waver o
Page 100 and 101:
I remind you that the place of semb
Page 102 and 103:
this term in the feminine, since th
Page 104 and 105:
which coincides with my experience,
Page 106 and 107:
and to put that for you in black an
Page 108 and 109:
see, does not see too great an inco
Page 110 and 111:
that exists, he says what he believ
Page 112 and 113:
In short, one must all the same rai
Page 114 and 115:
particular besides, neurotic, a sex
Page 116 and 117:
functioning as something else. And
Page 118 and 119:
mean to deny? What can one deny? Th
Page 120 and 121:
slipping from word to word, and thi
Page 122 and 123:
Seminar 12: 17 May 1977People in th
Page 124 and 125:
y writing. And writing only produce
Page 126 and 127:
not pinpointed it? He calls this a
show all

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?