10.07.2015 Views

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

Seminar XXIV Final Sessions 1 - Lacan in Ireland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

which co<strong>in</strong>cides with my experience, namely, that I do not recognise allwomen. There is no such th<strong>in</strong>g, but is all the same necessary to say that thisis not self-evident; There is no such th<strong>in</strong>g, unless it is <strong>in</strong>cestuous – this isvery exactly what Freud put forward – there is none such except <strong>in</strong>cestuous,I mean that, - what Freud said -, the fact is that the Oedipus myth designatesthe follow<strong>in</strong>g, that the only person that one wants to sleep with, is one’smother, and as regards the father, one kills him. It is even all the moreprobable that one knows neither who is your father and your mother, it isexactly why the myth of Oedipus has a sense; he killed someone that he didnot know and he slept with someone that he had not the slightest idea washis mother, it is nevertheless like that that th<strong>in</strong>gs happened accord<strong>in</strong>g to themyth, and what that means, is that the only true th<strong>in</strong>g is castration. In anycase with castration, one is quite sure of escap<strong>in</strong>g it, as all this so-calledGreek mythology designates clearly for us, namely, that the father, it is notso much his murder which is at stake as his castration, that castration passesby way of murder and that, as regards the mother, the best th<strong>in</strong>g that one cando with her, is to cut it off to be quite sure of not committ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cest.What I would like, is to give you the refraction of these truths <strong>in</strong> sense. Onewould have to manage to give an idea of a structure, which is such that itwould <strong>in</strong>carnate sense <strong>in</strong> a correct way. Contrary to what is said, there is notruth about the Real, s<strong>in</strong>ce the Real is sketched out as exclud<strong>in</strong>g sense. Itwould be still too much to say, that there is someth<strong>in</strong>g of the Real, because,to say that, is already to suppose a sense. The word Real has itself a sense, Ieven at one time, played a little bit on it, I mean to <strong>in</strong>voke the th<strong>in</strong>gs, Ievoked as an echo the word reus which, as you know, <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> means guilty;one is more or less guilty of the Real. This <strong>in</strong>deed is why moreoverpsychoanalysis is a serious th<strong>in</strong>g, I mean that it is not absurd to say that itcan slide <strong>in</strong>to fraudulence.There is someth<strong>in</strong>g that must be noted <strong>in</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g, which is that, as I po<strong>in</strong>tedout the last time to Pierre Soury – the last time, I mean <strong>in</strong> his own place, atJussieu, the one of which I spoke to you the last time – I po<strong>in</strong>ted out to himthat the reversible torus from which he approaches the Borromean knot is104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!