6139008-History-of-Money

present a very "terrifying picture." After World War II, the CFR Insiders used their enormous influence in the U.S. mediato rally support for the Marshall Plan, which was sold to Congress and the American people as an absolutely necessaryeconomic recovery plan to rebuild war-ravaged Europe and save its nations from "going Communist." In reality, theMarshall Plan was "a windfall for socialism," says economist Hans Sennholz. Through it tens of billions of dollars from U.S.taxpayers were funneled to socialist and internationalist parties, politicians, policies, programs, periodicals, andorganizations that would lead relentlessly toward the destruction of national sovereignty and the merger of the individualcountries of Europe into a centrally controlled, socialist mega-state. The European Insiders likewise lied to the Europeanpeople, insisting from the beginning, when the first six nations signed the Treaty of Rome creating the Common Market,that this was simply an arrangement to facilitate trade, travel, and commerce.Dr. Hans F. Sennholz, Chairman of the Department of Economics at Grove City (PA) College stated: "The Federal ReserveSystem facilitates the government's own inflationary financing in "periods of emergency." It makes easy the inflationaryfinancing of budget deficits and the inflationary refunding of government loans. It stabilizes the government bond marketthrough inflationary methods and manipulates this market to the advantage of the government. It does all this bywrecking the purchasing power of the dollar; by subtly stealing from the people of this country what it thus provides forthe government, through a process exactly on par with the coin-clipping of ancient kings - but much more diabolicalbecause it's so much less visible."Voices of WarningA significant and growing chorus of voices throughout Europe, especially in England, is venting anger over this massivedeception and warning the people of the enormous betrayal that is daily moving closer to final consummation. "Twentyyears ago, when the process began, there was no question of losing sovereignty," Sir Peregrine Worsthorne wrote inLondon’s Sunday Telegraph in 1991. "That was a lie, or at any rate, a dishonest obfuscation." Further, said Worsthorne,"For the past twenty years or so anybody wanting to have a career in the public service, in the higher reaches of the city,or the media has had to be pro-European. In the privacy of the closet or among close friends, even many federalistswould admit as much. But such is the momentum behind the European movement that none of these individual doubts,expressed separately, will be remotely sufficient to stop the juggernaut."Indeed, lone voices — even influential ones — had been far from sufficient to break through the media strangleholdexercised by the ruling elite of the Milner Group-RIIA-CFR thought cartel. In 1959, for example, few British citizens heard(and fewer still understood the importance of) the warning of Reginald Maulding, Chancellor of the Exchequer, concerningthe real nature of the Common Market. Said Maulding: "We must recognize that for us to sign the Treaty of Rome wouldbe to accept the ultimate goal — political federation in Europe including ourselves." Lord Bruce of Donington, a Member ofParliament from the Labour Party who has been a stalwart opponent of Euro-convergence schemes for four decades, waslikewise given the media blackout treatment. In a 1962 speech he cited Maulding’s warning that the Common Market wasreally aimed at eventual political unification. "This, of course, is not how the issue has been presented by the governmentto the people of this country," Lord Bruce cautioned. "The matter has been put forward in terms of the economicadvantages which would accrue to Britain if we joined ‘the Six’ in a Customs Union … allowing our industries to thrive inwhat appears to be a lush ‘home’ market of 214 million people."No "right-wing isolationist," Lord Bruce served in the European Parliament as Rapporteur for the Budget Committee andpresident of the Transport and Regional Committee as a representative of the European Socialist Group. In a 1996interview with International Currency Review, Lord Bruce noted that much of the impetus for European convergencecomes from the ruling elite of "the United States, which disguises its intent for public consumption but has consistentlyassisted the merging of Britain and the other European nations into a regional bloc." "The Americans," he said, "havesubsidized and promoted this aberration almost since its inception, and they are very active today."Under the banner of democracy, the governing powers are being turned over to a ruling Eurocrat elite. "The modernpolitician is placed in the hands of the bureaucratic conspirator — of which, of course, many officials of the EuropeanCommission are egregious examples," noted Bruce. "If you read Alan Clarke’s entertaining Diaries, you will recall thatwhat happens at Council meetings is that the visiting Ministers are presented at the start of each meeting with theCommunique that they are intended to sign. They are of course allowed to amend it, but the point is that the document isthere, the conclusions have already been reached and pre-packaged — by a bunch of unelected officials." The subversiveprocess is quite simple and efficient, he pointed out: "The prearranged Communique sets the tone of any discussions andinfluences and often governs the outcome. This method of administrative rule … reveals the true bureaucratic andmanipulative character of the EU system. Given these arrangements, the European Union is manifestly at the mercy ofagendas set by officials, amongst whose number there are known to be conspirators, either centrally in Brussels or withinthe national structures."Fortunately, Lord Bruce noted, due to the growing pressure of the various factions opposed to Euro-convergence, "it istoday acceptable to discuss the option of Britain leaving the European Union altogether, which was not the case even twomonths ago. I can well remember the time when I was speaking on this subject ten years ago in the House of Lords. If Ihad said in the House then what I routinely say today, I would have been howled down, or I would have endured itsparliamentary equivalent!"Core of CorruptionOne of the signal voices who has helped dramatically to expose the impending calamity of the euro and the EMU isBernard Connolly, a former senior EU official who was in charge of the European Monetary System and the National andThe Hidden History Of Money & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 632