6139008-History-of-Money

Pailatoos (Pilates). Buddhists have condemned it and the Quran does so as well (and probably other religious and nonreligiousbooks). While the old usurers at least lent their own money, the modern ones, the Bankers, are able to create itout of nothing. Aristotle and Plato in ancient Greece denounced it. Here is what the author of “Rural Rides” and MP in thereformed Parliament of 1832, William Cobbett, wrote: “I set to work to read the Act of Parliament by which the Bank ofEngland was created, and all the Acts about loans, and funds, and dividends, and payings, and sinking funds and I soonbegan to perceive that the fate of the Kingdom must finally turn upon what should be done with that accursed thing calledthe National Debt. The sum at first borrowed was a mere trifle. The inventors knew well what they were about. Theirdesign was to mortgage by degrees the whole of the country... to those who would lend money to the State... the deepscheme has from its ominous birth been breeding usurers of every description, feeding and fattening on the vitals of thecountry, till it has produced what the World never saw before - starvation in the midst of abundance!”The House of Rothschild - a term used to refer to the various branches of an international banking family where membersof the family all descended from a common ancestor, the German financier Mayer Amschel Rothschild. For almost 200years the house of Rothschild exerted a great influence on European economic history. Members of the family have spreadto the major financial capitals of Europe. Mayer Amschek was appointed financial agent of the British Government duringthe French revolutionary wars [1789]. With his five sons, he founded additional branches of the Rothschild banking housein four European cities. The Bank of England, central bank of Great Britain, is a financial institution with special privilegesand responsibilities. Located in London, it is often called the "Old Lady of Threadneedle Street." It was projected byEnglish financier William Paterson and was incorporated on July 27, 1694, as a private joint-stock association, with acapital of 1.2 million. In return for the loan of its entire capital to the government (of Great Britain)it received the right toissue notes and a monopoly on corporate banking in England. After the Battle of Waterlooo, the Rothschilds managed totake ownership of the Bank of England from its former private owners.EuropeLenin, in “Imperialism -The Last Stage”, wrote: “In running the current account of a certain number of capitalists, thebank may seem to be undertaking only a technical process; but when these operations assume extensive proportions, theresult is that a handful of monopolists control all the operations... of capitalist society. They can, by means of theirbanking connections, by knowing financial operations, first ascertain exactly the position of isolated capitalists, thencontrol them, act on them by restricting their credits, or, on the contrary, by extending them, at length they can entirelydetermine their fate...” Lenin, a cruel dictator, was also a shrewd observer.“Bundesbank - The Bank That Rules Europe”, by David Marsh (1992). The purpose of this book is to show theextensive power held by this central bank. On page 169 under the heading i: “THE CENTRAL BANK CAN TOPPLE THEGOVERNMENT...” This deals with conflicts between Fritz Schaffer, West Germany’s first Finance Minister with WilhelmVocke, the bank leader. Vocke complains (1950): “The main theme running through your newly drawn-up regulations is acertain mistrust towards the central bank. As you say yourself your primary concern is that: ‘The Central Bank can topplethe government.’” This power was to increase and the Bundesbank was able to remove three chancellors, Ludwig Erhard(1966), Kurt Georg Keisinger (1969) and Helmut Schmidt (1981).BritainGladstone (Morley’s “Life of Gladstone”) said: “From the time I took office as Chancellor of the Exchequer I began to learnthat the State held, in the face of the Bank and the City, an essentially false position as to finance... The hinge of thewhole position was this: the Government itself was not to be a substantive power in matters of finance, but was to leavethe Money Power supreme and unquestioned. In the conditions of that situation I was reluctant to acquiesce, and I beganto fight against it by financial self-assertion from the first... I was tenaciously opposed by the Governor and Deputy-Governor of the Bank, who had seats in Parliament, and I had the city for an antagonist on almost every occasion.”The Financial Times, Sept. 26, 1921 “Whoever may be the indiscreet minister who revives the money-trust bogey at amoment when the Government [Lloyd George’s] has most need to be polite to the banks, should be put through anelementary course of instruction in fact, as well as in manners. Does he, do his colleagues, realise that half a dozen menat the top of the big five banks could upset the whole fabric of Government finance by refraining from renewing treasurybills?”AmericaThomas Jefferson in Congress, 1809 ‘I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties thanstanding armies. Already they have raised up a money aristocracy that has set the Government at defiance. The issuingpower [of money] should be taken from the banks and restored to the Government and to the people to whom itbelongs.” Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln made similar comments.Letter written from London by the Rothschilds to their New York agents introducing their banking methodinto America: “The few who can understand the system will be either so interested in its profits, or so dependent on itsfavours, that there will be no opposition from that class, while, on the other hand, that great body of people, mentallyincapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that Capital derives from the system, will bear its burden withoutcomplaint and, perhaps, without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.”From the United States Bankers’ Magazine of 1892: “We must proceed with caution, and guard well every move made, forthe lower orders of people are already showing signs of restless commotions. Prudence will, therefore, dictate a policy ofapparently yielding to the popular will until all of our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designsThe Hidden History Of Money & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 613