6139008-History-of-Money

Patrick Henry refused to attend the Constitutional Convention, and genuinely democratic patriots such as George Mason,Luther Martin, John Francis Mercer, and Elbridge Gerry participated in the convention but refused to sign the newconstitution because it lacked a Bill of Rights, provided inadequate representation for the people, and did not provide for aviable separation of powers.George Mason said that the president and Senate would easily form "a combination that cannot be prevented by therepresentatives. The executive and legislative powers thus connected, will destroy all balances."Thomas Jefferson was in France at the time of the Constitutional Congress, and he only later realized that the Federalistleaders had created a new form of tyranny by seizing all governmental powers. The reality became clear to Jefferson,Madison, the Democratic-Republican party, and the American people in general that the republic was being taken over bya new dictatorship: the Federalist Party and its tool, President John Adams.Charles Townsend, Chancellor of the Exchequer (England) whose policies of money and taxation ledto the American Revolution had hired Adam Smith to tutor his stepson, Henry the young 3rd Dukeof Buccleuch, because of his work "The Theory of Moral Sentiment”. Adam Smith penned "TheWealth of Nations" at a time when the mercantilist policies of England had proven antiquated andwere no longer profitable. The Sovereign of England by this time was the Bank of England since1694 for whom the Chancellor of the Exchequer was employed. Sovereignty having passed duringthe reign of Charles II who bankrupted himself to bestow favors on an unscrupulous BarbaraVilliers, first to the Bullioneers and William Patterson’s East-India Company and subsequently to theBank of England when it acquired that company. Charles also sired illegitimately James Duke ofMonmouth and Buccleuch whose grandson was the above mentioned 3rd Duke. Smith wandered thecontinent, especially France, spending much time with the "physiocrats" and young Henry. Henry,13 years later, paid his friend and tutor to write "Wealth of Nations" thus intellectually justifying anew era and a new philosophy to justify the change in methodology.The Bank of England owners in 1694 recognized they could run the World's finances if they established privatecorporations in all the countries of the World. The combined debt of all the World's countries would create an incomestream of unbelievable amounts. They learned this from their experience with the East-India company. The worst fears ofPatrick Henry, George Mason, and many other anti-Federalists had been realized: the Constitution provided no viablemeans of making certain that the powers of government could not be appropriated by a single faction. In terms ofproviding for a government controlled by the consent of the governed, the Constitution proved to be a failure from its verybeginning. In 1796, the Federalist party had gained an increased majority in both houses of Congress and had tightenedits grip on the American mind through warmongering, fomenting super-patriotism, and silencing its enemies by enforcingthe unconstitutional Sedition Act of 1796 (we have the Patriot Act today). But within one short year, the totalitarianFederalist regime was swept out of office and a new era of democracy began.J. C. Miller, Crisis in Freedom: the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1796: "The Sedition Act was an implied acknowledgementby the Federalists that force and coercion rather than reason and argument were to be the ultimate arbiters of politicalcontroversy in the United States. Differences of opinion were to be erased and the American mind was to be forced intoan intellectual strait jacket. . .Under the Sedition Act, by expanding the definition of seditious libel, an end might be put toall organized political opposition...By this means, the Federalists could ensure the perpetuation of their party's control ofthe national government."The Federalists in 1796 had used the threat of attack by hostile forces as the excuse to enact the Sedition Act laws whichlike today’s Patriot Act (déjà vu):• branded their political opponents as traitors• made it a crime for American citizens to "print, utter, or publish . . . any false,scandalous, and malicious writing" about the Government• imprisoned their most outspoken verbal critics• allowed aliens to be imprisoned or deported at the whim of the president• had the intent of keeping the Federalists in power indefinitely, perpetuating itscontrol of the governmentThe Federalists had almost declared war on France through their own bellicosity, notthrough any real threat to American security, just like Bush declared war on Iraq. TheFederalists had only handed over power to the constitutionally-elected President, ThomasJefferson, after the Federalist-controlled House of Representatives had prolonged theprocess through 36 ballots, leading Jefferson to wonder, understandably, if the Federalistswere going to retain control of the government illegally.The Supreme Court had construed the Constitution as allowing the Federal government toseize unlimited powers, restrained by no force other than its own will. The Federalists hadlost control of the Presidency and both houses of Congress in the 1800 election. The lameduckFederalist Congress, before adjourning in March 1801, passed a new judiciary actwhich created a number of new circuit court judgeships and increased the number of districtcourt judges. Adams packed the new lifetime judicial posts with Federalist sympathizers andThe Hidden History Of Money & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 522