10.07.2015 Views

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bremer Order #39: Foreign InvestmentBremer Order #39, enacted on September 19, 2003, has five key elements: (1) Privatization <strong>of</strong> state-owned enterprises;(2) 100% foreign ownership <strong>of</strong> businesses in all sectors except oil and mineral extraction, banks and insurance companies(the latter two are addressed in a separate order); (3) "national treatment" <strong>of</strong> foreign firms; (4) unrestricted, tax-freeremittance <strong>of</strong> all funds associated with the investment, including, but not limited to, pr<strong>of</strong>its; and (5) 40 year ownershiplicenses which have the option <strong>of</strong> being renewed.1. PrivatizationThe Order allows for privatization <strong>of</strong> all state-owned entities. It is difficult to overstate how fundamental a change this isto the Iraqi economy. As the preamble to the Order explains, it will move Iraq from a "centrally planned economy to amarket economy" in one fell swoop by U.S. fiat. This will involve some 200 state-owned enterprises. Thus, everythingfrom water services, electric utilities, schools, hospitals, television and newspapers, to prisons could be privatized underthe Order. The water sector is already being "reconstructed" by the Bechtel Corporation <strong>of</strong> San Francisco ‚ one <strong>of</strong> the topten water privatization companies in the World. Bechtel is the second largest recipient <strong>of</strong> reconstruction dollars in Iraqafter Halliburton ‚ totaling nearly $3 billion. Bechtel's contract includes the repair <strong>of</strong> Iraq's water, sewage and electricitysystems, as well as many <strong>of</strong> its hospitals and schools.Cliff Mumm, head <strong>of</strong> Bechtel's Iraq operation, told the San Francisco Chronicle that Iraq "has two rivers, it's fertile, it'ssitting on an ocean <strong>of</strong> oil. Iraq ought to be a major player in the World. And we want to be working for them long term."Bechtel's track record does not bode well for the Iraqi people-in fact, the citizens <strong>of</strong> Bolivia have written a letter to thepeople <strong>of</strong> Iraq warning them <strong>of</strong> what to expect from Bechtel. A subsidiary <strong>of</strong> Bechtel privatized the water systems <strong>of</strong>Cochabamba, Bolivia and immediately sent prices sky-rocketing. Families earning a minimum wage <strong>of</strong> $60 per monthfaced water bills <strong>of</strong> $20 per month. The citizens rose in protest and at least one seventeen year-old boy lost his life toBolivian troops sent into the streets to defend Bechtel's right to privatize with deadly force. Ultimately, the governmentrelented and cancelled the contract. Bechtel has responded with a $25 million lawsuit against Bolivia for lost pr<strong>of</strong>its. Notsurprisingly, when Thomas Foley, former director <strong>of</strong> Private Sector Development for the CPA, announced a list <strong>of</strong> the firststate enterprises to be sold <strong>of</strong>f last fall which included cement and fertilizer plants, phosphate and sulfur mines,pharmaceutical factories, and the country's airline, there was immediate unrest. With anywhere from 50% - 70% <strong>of</strong> theworkforce already unemployed, additional lay<strong>of</strong>fs ‚ which always follow on the heels <strong>of</strong> privatization ‚ were unacceptable.Furthermore, those remaining workers who still have jobs only receive "emergency pay" mandated by the CPA ‚ about half<strong>of</strong> what they made before the war, while prices have skyrocketed and the social safety net has been virtually eliminated.The CPA promised that the U.S. corporations doing the reconstruction would solve the unemployment problem, promising300,000 jobs in an August 13, 2003 letter. Only a handful <strong>of</strong> these jobs have materialized. One reason is that many firmsare bringing in non-Iraqis to do the bulk <strong>of</strong> the work.Thus, privatization was met with stiff organized resistance. In response, Bremer was forced to put the immediateprivatization plans on hold for the short-term. However, the long-term plans are clear. BearingPoint, the U.S. Agency forInternational Development (USAID) and others both in or contracted by the U.S. government will implement the majority<strong>of</strong> the economic policies with the new Iraqi government. Therefore, implementation can wait until the friction over howthat government is created is resolved. Furthermore, the process <strong>of</strong> preparing for privatization has not slowed, while theemphasis on privatization is already rearing its head in Iraq. For example:• On April 25, 2004, Iraq's minister <strong>of</strong> public works told The Independent that Iraq was considering privatizing its waterindustry to "fund essential works." While the U.S. government is obligated to ensure that water is provided to thepeople <strong>of</strong> Iraq, it is telling that the Minister did not discuss going to the CPA to demand restoration <strong>of</strong> water servicesnor to Bechtel to demand that it fulfill the requirements <strong>of</strong> its contract. Rather, she speaks immediately <strong>of</strong>privatization.• Meetings among global corporations to discuss privatization and investment in Iraq have been taking place unabatedat least since the invasion. For example, in February, the U.S. Commerce Department held a "Doing Business in Iraq"conference attended by some five hundred U.S. companies including Boeing, Caterpillar, DaimlerChrysler, Micros<strong>of</strong>t,IBM, Motorala, Bechtel and Flour. This conference took place immediately following vocal criticism by the IraqiGoverning Council's top representative in Washington that the U.S. was passing over Iraqi firms in awardingreconstruction contracts. The latest <strong>of</strong> these meetings took place just over a week ago in London. Called "IraqProcurement 2004 ‚ Meet the Buyer" ‚ it was sponsored by ExxonMobil, Oxy, Volvo, Shell, Raytheon andChevronTexaco ‚ among others. You can visit web sites like www.export.gov/Iraq orhttp://www.iraqprocurement.com/ to learn more and similar meetings taking place monthly around the World.• The CPA's continued interest in luring the private sector to Iraq is evidenced by the fact that it recently named a newdirector <strong>of</strong> Private Sector Development. He is Ari Fleischer's brother, Michael.• Most importantly, it is abundantly clear from BearingPoint's contract that full implementation is intended to take placeafter the new Iraqi government is in place ‚ not in the few months remaining before the "hand-over." The contract isfor three years with the option <strong>of</strong> renewal. They are not going anywhere. Of course, the contract specifically statesthat while there is a commitment to place "Iraq's leaders and stakeholders in the driver's seat" their input on policieswill only be used "as long as these are consistent with the overall objectives <strong>of</strong> the project and with USAID policies,regulations and guidelines."The Hidden <strong>History</strong> Of <strong>Money</strong> & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 486

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!