10.07.2015 Views

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

went down. The kings forcibly passed “legal tender laws” which required everyone to accept the coins at face value. Thelaws were enforced through brute force, imprisonment and death. Then, further laws were passed to forcibly keep thecoin’s face value at an amount convenient to persons in power. Then, another phenomenon occurred with the goldsmiths.People used the vaults <strong>of</strong> the goldsmiths to keep their own gold safe for a small fee. Once the gold was deposited into thevault, the depositor was given a paper receipt from the goldsmith. Simply presenting the receipt to the goldsmith wasenough to make a withdrawal <strong>of</strong> gold from the vault, just as you make a paper withdrawal from the bank. Eventually, thepaper receipts were also traded for goods and services since there was gold at the vault to back up the value <strong>of</strong> thereceipt. The receipt was backed by gold and this made people comfortable with accepting the receipt. The value <strong>of</strong> thereceipt depended on the reputation <strong>of</strong> the goldsmith.Laurence H. Meyer, Governor <strong>of</strong> the Federal Reserve Bank, said the following at the Distinguished Lecture Program,Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania on December 5, 2001: The next important evolution was the introduction<strong>of</strong> "representative" paper money. Warehouses accepted deposits <strong>of</strong> silver and gold and issued paper receipts. These paperreceipts in turn began to circulate as money, used as a means <strong>of</strong> payment and held as a store <strong>of</strong> value. The paper wasfully backed by the precious metals in the warehouse. Once again, efficiency was enhanced by the convenience <strong>of</strong> carryingpaper money as opposed to the bulkier silver or gold coins.Alan Greenspan, Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Federal Reserve Bank, made remarks at the opening <strong>of</strong> an American NumismaticSociety Exhibition, Federal Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> New York, New York, on January 16, 2002: Many millennia later, in one <strong>of</strong> theremarkable advances in financial history, the bank note emerged as a medium <strong>of</strong> exchange. It had no intrinsic value. Itwas rather a promise to pay, on demand, a certain quantity <strong>of</strong> gold or other valued commodity. The bank note's valuerested on trust in the willingness and ability <strong>of</strong> the bank note issuer to meet that promise. Reputation for trustworthiness,accordingly, became an economic value to banks--the early issuers <strong>of</strong> private paper currency. The Federal Reserve nowpromises to tax you and uses you as the collateral against which it issues the Federal Reserve Notes andcyber money!!!Paper receipts were traded as a more convenient means to buy and sell than using gold. The paper receipts were backedby the gold in the goldsmiths’ vault. The goldsmiths also observed that most <strong>of</strong> the gold, over three-fourths <strong>of</strong> it,remained in the vault at any given time. Many goldsmiths decided to issue loans by writing paper receipts notbacked by gold. The goldsmiths collected usury on these loans. A share <strong>of</strong> the fees from the interest would be splitamong the depositors <strong>of</strong> the gold. However, the goldsmith did not allow people to borrow the gold. They simply wrote outmore paper receipts that were not backed by gold. The goldsmiths <strong>of</strong> the past are the Bankers <strong>of</strong> today. Goldsmiths wroteout paper currency not backed by gold. These receipts were used as paper loans to borrowers. An example <strong>of</strong> goldsmithsissuing more paper receipts than there is gold:Before, 100 coins = 100 paper receipts provided to depositorsAfter, 100 coins = 100 paper receipts provided to depositors +100 paper receipts used as paper loans to borrowers.Result: Paper loans diluted the value <strong>of</strong> the receipts issued by the Goldsmith.You can interpret this as a hidden tax, inflation or a RIP-OFF theft that puts our money into the banking dynasties’pockets. There were many more receipts and loans than there was gold. The goldsmiths couldn’t possibly fulfill all theobligations because not all receipts were backed by an equivalent amount <strong>of</strong> gold, unless they were themselves able toborrow from other goldsmiths in case <strong>of</strong> a run-on-the-bank. The government <strong>of</strong>ficials, like the kings in the past, forcedcitizens to accept the paper notes at their face value by passing legal tender laws knowing full well that the receipts werenot backed by gold. In other words, government <strong>of</strong>ficials colluded with the banking dynasties. Remember that the papernotes were not backed by gold. The paper notes were worthless and people were forced, according to the legal tenderlaws, to accept them as currency. These paper notes had no intrinsic value whatsoever. This is called “fractional reservebanking” and it is a simple representation <strong>of</strong> how banks operate today. The banks and the goldsmiths had a great deal incommon. They both duplicated currency out <strong>of</strong> ordinary paper. The paper currency floating around is not properlysupported by an equal amount <strong>of</strong> gold or silver. The paper currency cannot be redeemed for the gold because there isn'tenough gold to satisfy the depositor’s claims. Embezzlement has occurred because the Bankers have fooled the peopleholding the currency into believing that it’s worth the gold it is supposed to represent. Everyone saw and felt the paperdollars in their pockets. The public didn’t see that the Bankers, or the goldsmiths, diluted the value <strong>of</strong> their paper currencyby simple producing more <strong>of</strong> it. Theft was occurring right under their noses and no one, other than the Bankers andsome <strong>of</strong> the politicians, were the wiser.Governor Laurence H. Meyer, <strong>of</strong> the Federal Reserve Bank, explained the beginning <strong>of</strong> fractional reserve bankingat the Distinguished Lecture Program, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania on December 5, 2001: Owners <strong>of</strong>the warehouses soon learned that the holders <strong>of</strong> the paper receipts would not simultaneously redeem the gold depositedwith them. The warehouses could therefore lend the gold--in turn, <strong>of</strong>ten converted into paper notes--holding a reserve <strong>of</strong>gold that allowed them to meet the normal demands for redemption”.This was the beginning <strong>of</strong> fractional reserve banking. Every time the goldsmith wrote another paper receipt that was notbacked by gold, all other receipts decreased in value. The goldsmith <strong>of</strong> the past is the banker <strong>of</strong> today. Anytime a papercurrency that is backed by gold is diluted with paper money that is not backed by gold, the original currency loses itsvalue. The Federal Reserve “dollar” is a paper currency note. It is a token made <strong>of</strong> paper or a base metal. It is not moneybecause it cannot be redeemed for gold or silver. When the amount <strong>of</strong> gold in reserve stays the same, printing morepaper currency reduces the value <strong>of</strong> currency in everyone’s pockets. Each unit <strong>of</strong> currency is worth less once the newThe Hidden <strong>History</strong> Of <strong>Money</strong> & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 388

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!